Clinical Research Directory

Feasibility and Efficiency Study for the Implementation of a New Screening Method for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Laboratory Practice

Prospective, multicenter study for the non-inferiority assessment of RAMD compared to GSS in determining the prognostic risk category according to ELN2022 for newly diagnosed AML patients on blood samples.

Pivotal Open-label Phase 3 Clinical Study of QTX-2101 in Adult Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

This Phase 3 study in adult participants with newly diagnosed low-risk APL will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and PK of an oral capsule formulation of ATO, in combination with ATRA.

French Registry of First-line Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

The registry aims to compare the two first-line available treatment approaches in non-high-risk APL patients aged ≤ 70 years - ATRA plus chemotherapy and ATRA plus ATO - in terms of practitioner's choice between the two options, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, long-term outcome, and short- and long-term toxic effects.

Study for Patients With Newly Diagnosed, High-risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by consistent clinical, morphologic, and genetic features. According to the FAB classification APL is designated as"M3 leukemia" and assigned to the WHO defined type of AML with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities, "acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12), (PML/RARα) and variants". Despite the dramatic progress achieved in frontline therapy of APL with ATRA plus anthracycline-based regimens, relapses still occur in approximately 20% of patients. Moreover, these regimens are associated with significant toxicities due to severe myelosuppression frequently associated with life-threatening infections and potentially serious late effects including development of secondary MDS/AML. In a recent randomized clinical trial in low/intermediate-risk APL (WBC ≤ 10 GPt/l APL0406 trial) a combination of arsenic trioxide (ATO) and ATRA has been shown to result into better survival with significantly lower toxicity rates compared to the standard ATRA + idarubicin (AIDA) therapy. Inspired by the results of this trial the investigators intend to perform a randomized study in high-risk APL (WBC at diagnosis \> 10 GPt/l) comparing standard AIDA-based treatment with ATO/ATRA combination including low-doses idarubicin during induction. The investigators propose a modified ATO/ATRA protocol with the addition of two doses of IDA (50% compared to standard AIDA induction) for induction because of the anticipated need of adding anthracyclines to control hyperleukocytosis and to achieve long-term disease control in this high-risk APL population. This is followed by 4 cycles of ATO/ATRA consolidation therapy. As in the APL0406 study for low/intermediate-risk patients the investigators expect less severe hematologic toxicity and treatment-related mortality resulting in an improved outcome for patients in the experimental arm. Furthermore, from the start of consolidation, these patients (in contrast to the standard arm) can be treated on an outpatient basis, which is also considered to be associated with an improved quality of life. The study will be conducted as a European intergroup study.

A Trial to Investigate Whether Oral Arsenic Trioxide Is Similar to Intravenous Arsenic Trioxide in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy (LATITUDE/SDKARS-301)

LATITUDE: A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, 3-Cohort, 2-Period, 2- Sequence, Crossover Trial to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Oral Arsenic Trioxide Versus Intravenous Arsenic Trioxide for Consolidation Therapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed, Non-High Risk, Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Rationale: SDK Therapeutics is developing an oral formulation of arsenic trioxide (ATO) for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Patients with APL are usually treated with arsenic trioxide (ATO) through an IV along with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) taken by mouth. Receiving ATO through an IV requires patients with APL to go to the hospital a lot and get long treatments (sometimes every day over a year of treatment). This can be hard and uncomfortable. If ATO can be taken by mouth, it would be much easier for patients and their families. Objective: The main objective is to show that the body absorbs the same amount of ATO whether it's taken by mouth or through an IV. Other objectives include checking if ATO taken by mouth works just as well, causes fewer heart problems, is safe, and improves quality of life compared with ATO given through an IV. Main trial endpoints: The main endpoint being measured is how much ATO is in the blood after 5 doses. Another important endpoint is how many patients have no signs of cancer in their blood after 3 rounds of treatment. Secondary trial endpoints: Other things being measured include: whether patients stay cancer-free over 2 years; changes in heart rhythm; side effects and lab test results; how patients feel during treatment; how much of ATO is in the blood; and how often patients feel bothered by side effects. Trial design: This is an open-label study, meaning everyone knows which treatment they are getting. Patients will get 4 rounds of treatment, each lasting 8 weeks. After that, patients will have check-ups every 3 months to assess safety and disease status for a total of 2 years. Trial population: The study includes adults and teens (12 years and older) who have APL, are not high-risk, and have already finished the first part of their treatment (induction) with IV ATO and ATRA. Interventions: There are 3 groups in the study: Cohort A: Takes 0.15 mg/kg Oral ATO for 3 rounds, then switches to 0.15 mg/kg IV ATO for part of the 4th round. Cohort B: Takes 0.15 mg/kg IV ATO for 3 rounds, then switches to 0.15 mg/kg Oral ATO for part of the 4th round. Cohort C: Takes 0.15 mg/kg Oral ATO for all 4 rounds. All cohorts also take 45 mg/m2/day ATRA during certain weeks of each round. Doctors will assess efficacy by checking bone marrow samples before and during treatment to see if the cancer is gone. Special lab tests will be used to look for cancer cells. Safety will be assessed by checking for side effects using blood tests, heart tests, physical exams, and other health checks. Quality of life will be assessed by the patients who will fill out surveys about how they feel during treatment and how much the side effects bother them. The study will also look at how often patients need to go to the doctor or hospital; how treatment affects daily life and work; and how satisfied patients are with their treatment.

Frontline Oral Arsenic Trioxide for APL

The investigators have formulated an oral preparation of arsenic trioxide (oral-ATO), and shown that it is efficacious for APL in R1, inducing CR2 in more than 90% of patients \[8,9\]. Furthermore, in an effort to prevent relapse, the investigators have moved oral-ATO forward to the maintenance of CR1. This strategy results in favorable overall-survival (OS) and leukemia-free-survival (LFS) \[10\], implying that prolonged treatment with oral-ATO may prevent relapses. Current protocols have incorporated i.v.-ATO in the treatment of newly-diagnosed APL \[11-15\]. For regimens comprising oral-ATO, ATRA and chemotherapy, 5-year OS in excess of 90% is achieved \[11-15\]. The investigators have also published long-term data showing the use of oral-ATO is highly effective and safe in the relapsed and frontline settings \[16,17\]. In this study, the investigators evaluate the use of oral-ATO and ATRA based induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients with APL with no of minimal chemotherapy in a prospective multicentre phase 2 study.

Venetoclax for Prevention of Differentiation Syndrom in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Patients

This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of venetoclax for prevention of DS in APL patients undergoing ATRA/ATO induction regimen.

Optimum Induction Therapy of Low-risk APL

Despite the high cure probability for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a minority of patients will relapse and the risk factors for relapse are unclear. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of induction of oral all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and realgar-indigo naturalis formula (RIF) combined with oral etoposide or daunorubicin as cytoreductive therapies in low-risk APL. The present study was to explored a cytoreduction of an oral etoposide for low-risk APL with dual induction of ATRA and RIF as a high efficacy, low recurrence, and more convenient all-oral regimen.

Treatment Study for Children and Adolescents With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

The trial is open to all patients with a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) who are PCR-positive for the PML-RARα transcript and less than 18 years of age.

Diagnostic Study of Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

This research trial studies molecular genetic features in blood and tissue samples from patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute promyelocytic leukemia. Studying samples of blood and tissue from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute promyelocytic leukemia in the laboratory may help doctors identify and learn more about biomarkers related to cancer.