Clinical Research Directory

Study of Aerosolized Antibiotics and Pembrolizumab in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be hard to treat and is often fatal. People with NSCLC commonly have changes in the bacteria that populate their lungs. These bacterial changes may aid tumor growth. Researchers want to find out if treating the bacteria, too, can help cancer treatment work better. Objective: To test 2 inhaled antibiotics (aztreonam and vancomycin), combined with a standard cancer treatment, in people with NSCLC. Eligibility: People aged 18 years and older with NSCLC that has returned or progressed after treatment and cannot be treated with surgery. Design: Participants will be screened. They will have a physical exam with blood tests. They may blow into a machine to test how well their lungs work. They will have imaging scans. They may need to have a small piece of tissue cut from their tumor (biopsy). Participants will be treated in six 21-day cycles. They will visit the clinic to receive a drug for cancer treatment on the first day of each cycle. This drug will be administered through a tube attached to a needle inserted into a vein in the arm. The 2 antibiotic drugs will be in the form of a fine mist that can be inhaled. Participants use a device to take these drugs at home. They will inhale aztreonam up to 3 times a day and vancomycin 1 or 2 times a day. They will take these drugs during only 3 of the treatment cycles. Biopsies and other tests will be repeated halfway through and after the study treatment. Follow-up visits will continue for 1 year after study treatment.

AZD9291 in Combination With Ascending Doses of Novel Therapeutics

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and preliminary anti-tumour activity of AZD9291 when given together with AZD6094 or selumetinib in patients with EGFR mutation positive advanced lung cancer

Tepotinib vs Standard Treatment in Patients With Advanced MET Exon 14 Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated

The hypothesize is that tepotinib is more effective than the investigator's choice of treatment in patients with MET-mutated NSCLC who have progressed after at least one first-line treatment. The main benefit concerns patient access to tepotinib. There is currently no access to a new-generation MET TKI in France for METex14 patients, due to lack of comparative data. There are no phase III RCTs underway anywhere in the world. This study is the only opportunity, perhaps the last, to generate comparative data which, if positive, will enable the drug to be reimbursed. With this in mind, the methodology of this study was discussed with the HAS on several occasions beforehand, to ensure that it met their expectations. With a response rate of around 50% and a median progression-free survival of 11 months in previously-treated subjects based on clinical trials data, tepotinib is a key drug for METex14 NSCLC patients, who are generally elderly and frail, and for whom therapeutic options are limited. The investigators expect to observe a benefit for patients treated with tepotinib compared to the control arm in terms of PFS, quality of life, objective response rate and duration of response. The overall survival benefit may be compromised by allowing patients in the control arm to cross over to tepotinib once they have progressed. However, the investigators have decided to maintain this crossover and consequently use PFS as the primary endpoint, as there is no clinical equipoise regarding the efficacy of tepotinib in METex14 NSCLC patients. The EMA has already approved tepotinib based on efficacy and safety data from clinical trials, and patients and investigators already consider this treatment as an important therapeutic option. Indeed, both ESMO and ASCO guidelines recommend the use of MET TKIs in these patients. In France, although neither tepotinib nor capmatinib are available, crizotinib, a multi-target TKI also active on MET, can be used off-label. If cross-over to tepotinib was not allowed in this trial, most patients would still benefit from cross-over to a MET TKI by receiving off-label crizotinib, which would in any case lead to a misinterpretation of the OS data. Therefore, the investigators believe it is preferable to control for cross-over and expose progressive patients in the control arm to tepotinib and use PFS as the primary endpoint. Toxicity of MET TKIs is considered as manageable. In the VISION trial, of 313 patients treated with tepotinib (median age: 72 years), 109 (34.8%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, leading to discontinuation in 46 patients (14.7%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies. Edema, the most common adverse event of clinical interest (AECI), was reported in 67.1% (grade ≥ 3, 11.2%). Median time to first edema onset was 7.9 weeks (range: 0.1-58.3). Edema was manageable with supportive measures, dose reduction (18.8%), and/or treatment interruption (23.1%), and rarely prompted discontinuation (4.3%). Other AECIs were also manageable and predominantly mild/moderate: hypoalbuminemia, 23.6% (grade ≥ 3, 3.5%); creatinine increase, 22.0% (grade ≥ 3, 1.0%); nausea, 23.3% (grade ≥ 3, 0.6%), diarrhea, 22.4% (grade ≥ 3, 0.3%), decreased appetite (grade ≥ 3, 0.3%), and ALT increase, 14.1% (grade ≥ 3, 2.2%). GI AEs typically occurred early and resolved in the first weeks10,13. Given the efficacy of tepotinib, the manageable safety profile, and the oral administration of tepotinib, the investigators anticipate that treatment with tepotinib will be associated with improved quality of life. Treatments offered in the control group correspond to standard treatments for advanced NSCLC in second line or beyond. In terms of prior lines of treatment, the eligibility criteria of the trial are aligned with the EMA label of tepotinib: "indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring alterations leading to MET gene exon 14 (METex14) skipping, who require systemic therapy following prior treatment with immunotherapy and/or platinum-based chemotherapy". The investigators have not included platinum-based chemotherapy as a treatment option in the control arm, considering that patients who are eligible to platinum-based chemotherapy should have received this regimen in first-line, as per ESMO guidelines14. Given the low efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene addiction, it is unlikely that some patients would receive immunotherapy alone as first-line treatment. Thus, the absence of platinum-based chemotherapy as a treatment choice in the control arm seems reasonable and will reduce the heterogeneity of this arm.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DS-1062a in participants with metastatic, unresectable NSCLC having progressed on one, but not more than three previous standard therapies. Moreover, the immune effects, the predictors of resistance and response to treatment, the effect of the chemotherapy on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication will be assessed and will help identify the subgroups that will mostly benefit from the treatment. The pharmacokinetics of the product and the anti-drug antibody (ADA) will be also evaluated. A total of 100 participants are planned to be included in the study. Participants will receive, every three weeks, a dose of DS-1062a equivalent to 6 mg/kg of body weight until progression or until unacceptable toxicity. Tumor evaluation will be performed every six weeks by the mean of a computed tomography for the thorax, abdomen and pelvis (TAP CT-scan) or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain and/or bone CT scans will be also performed throughout the study for participants with brain and/or bone metastasis. The safety of the product will be assessed, through complete clinical exams, biological tests, electrocardiograms (ECGs), cardiac echographies (ECHOs) and through the collection of ongoing toxicities or adverse events.

A Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy of FF-10832 in Combo With Pembrolizumab in Urothelial & Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

To confirm a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of FF-10832 (Gemcitabine Liposome Injection) given intravenously Day 1 of a 21-day cycle, in combination with 200 mg pembrolizumab given intravenously Day 1 of the same 21-day cycle, for treatment of advanced urothelial and non-small cell lung cancer

Retrospective Observational Study on Prediction of Response to PD-1 Immunotherapy in Patients with NSCLC

Therapeutic antibodies that block the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway have revolutionized immuno-oncology by inducing robust and durable responses in patients with various cancer including advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, these responses only occur in a subset of patients, even in case of PD-L1 overexpression. Elucidating the determinants of response and resistance but also of severe immune-mediated adverse events is key to improving outcomes and developing new treatment strategies. Biomarkers that predict immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy and toxicity are urgently needed and could emerge from characterization of tumor microenvironment. The purpose of PREDICTION project is to elucidate response and toxicity predictive immunophenotypic signatures using a new in situ multiplexed strategy with imaging mass cytometry Hyperion. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab will be selected on their response and toxicity profiles. Then, tumor samples will be analysed with Hyperion technology, allowing delineation of cell subpopulations and cell-cell interactions, highlighting tumor heterogeneity and to determine correlations between response and toxicity features. The number of co-analysable markers enables global vision on the same tissue section. A better understanding of the tumor microenvironment complex system will lead to discover new predictive biomarkers potentially transferable to current practice.

Phase 3 Study of MRTX849 (Adagrasib) vs Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With KRAS G12C Mutation

This Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy of the investigational agent MRTX849 (adagrasib) versus docetaxel in patients who have been previously treated for metastatic NSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation.

Imaging Advanced NSCLC Patients Undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 Directed Therapy Using [18F]-FARAG

This pilot study uses \[18F\]F AraG PET imaging to evaluate the immunological response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CkIT) in patients with advanced NSCLC tumors. The study's main objectives are to quantify the change in \[18F\]F AraG PET signal before and while on CkIT therapy and to correlate this change in \[18F\]F AraG PET signal with radiographic response. To explore these objectives, eligible subjects will undergo pre- and on - CkIT treatment \[18F\]F AraG PET/CT scans, and will be followed up for 12 months for assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes. This study is a single-site, open label, non randomized, single arm pilot trial. Patients and care providers will not be blinded to any part of the study.

Lifei Xiaoji Wan in Treatment of Advanced NSCLC

This study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Lifei Xiaoji Wan for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), establish the treatment scheme, and obtain high-quality clinical evidence.