Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
14 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 14 Alveolar Ridge Preservation clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07394738
Using Different Biomaterials to Preserve Bone After Tooth Extraction
This clinical study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different biomaterials in alveolar socket preservation following tooth extraction. Participants will be allocated into three groups: (1) dentin graft, (2) dentin graft combined with hyaluronic acid, (3) allograft and (4) natural healing without any grafting material (control group). At 4 months post-extraction, dental implants will be placed, and bone biopsies will be obtained during the procedure. These biopsy samples will be subjected to histological analysis to assess new bone formation and graft integration. The study will contribute to the understanding of biomaterial performance in socket preservation prior to implant placement.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 65 Years
Updated: 2026-03-27
1 state
NCT07427784
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Dental implants are considered a predictable rehabilitative option following tooth extraction or in cases of missing teeth. In some situations, the inevitable alveolar ridge resorption that occurs after extraction may make the placement of standard-diameter (\>3.5 mm) or standard-length implants difficult or even impossible without advanced bone augmentation procedures. To counteract post-extraction volumetric bone contraction, alveolar ridge preservation can be performed, consisting of placing a bone graft within the socket walls immediately after tooth extraction. Although this procedure cannot completely prevent dimensional changes, it has been shown to significantly reduce both horizontal and vertical ridge resorption, as reported in the scientific literature. However, there is a lack of clinical and radiographic studies evaluating the outcomes of implant rehabilitation following alveolar ridge preservation with standard-dimension implants in a hospital-based setting.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-03-20
NCT07373600
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Delayed Dental Implant Placement After Socket Preservation Using Injectable Bone Graft
This clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of delayed dental implant placement following socket preservation using an injectable alloplastic bone graft material. The study will include patients who require tooth extraction and are candidates for implant placement. After tooth extraction, the socket will be preserved using the bone graft material, and dental implants will be placed after a healing period. Clinical and radiographic assessments will be performed to evaluate bone quality, bone height, and implant stability. The goal of this study is to determine the effectiveness of injectable alloplastic bone grafts in maintaining the alveolar ridge and improving the success of delayed implant placement.
Gender: All
Ages: 40 Years - 60 Years
Updated: 2026-01-28
NCT07091448
Biotivity A-C Membrane Socket Preservation Study
This is a prospective, randomized controlled pilot clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a human placental-derived amnion chorion membrane (Biotivity™ A/C Plus Membrane) versus a conventional collagen membrane in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) following atraumatic extraction of single posterior teeth. A total of 12 subjects will be enrolled at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry. The study aims to assess both soft tissue wound healing and hard/soft tissue dimensional changes over a 5-month period prior to dental implant placement. Throughout the approximately 6-month study duration, participants will undergo oral exams, x-rays, surgical procedures, and follow-up visits. All participants will undergo routine tooth extraction, bone graft material and barrier placement, and dental implant placement. Participation in the study is voluntary, and the alternative is to continue routine dental care. Risks include minor discomfort from procedures such as tooth extraction and implant placement. The major benefit of participation in the study is the preservation of jaw dimensions following extraction, which will simplify the placement of a dental implant.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-01-28
1 state
NCT07242313
Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation
This clinical investigation aims to assess how two different allogeneic dentin graft materials - one de-mineralized and the other mineralized - influence bone preservation following extraction of a single upper posterior tooth. A total of 45 patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups: a socket-only spontaneous healing group (control), a de-mineralized dentin graft group, and a mineralized dentin graft group. Over a six-month period after extraction, measurements will be taken using CBCT to monitor changes in ridge width, height, and bone density. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain, postoperative swelling, satisfaction levels, width of keratinized tissue, and histomorphometric data from biopsy samples at implant placement. Findings from this trial may support evidence-based decisions in alveolar ridge preservation and help clinicians choose the most predictable grafting strategy before implant placement.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years
Updated: 2025-11-24
NCT07239193
Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
When a tooth is removed, the bone around it (called the alveolar ridge) naturally shrinks. This study compares two bone grafting materials to find out which one better preserves bone after molar extraction: Demineralized Dentin Matrix (DDM): A material made from the patient's own extracted tooth, treated to remove minerals while keeping bone-forming proteins. Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix (MPM): A mixture of a standard bone substitute and platelet-rich plasma from the patient's blood.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 55 Years
Updated: 2025-11-20
NCT06275789
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
The purpose of the study is to compare a new grafting material for alveolar ridge preservation to a commonly used and well studied material. Alveolar ridge dimensions as well as histology will be compared.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-09-12
1 state
NCT07001345
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing
Rationale: To determine the effect of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) versus spontaneous healing (SH) in large buccal bone defects in the posterior mandible. Objective: To evaluate whether ARP using a xenograft (XG) (Cerabone plus) or an allograft (AG) (Maxgraft granules) covered by a membrane (Jason membrane) reduces the need for additional bone augmentation either prior to or during implant placement in the posterior mandible compared to spontaneous healing Study design: Prospective randomized clinical study with 10-year follow-up. Study population: Inclusion criteria: patients are 18 years or older and in need for extraction of a (pre)molar in the posterior mandible with at least one adjacent tooth and a buccal bone defect of \>50%. Exclusion criteria: the presence of active periodontal disease, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, a history of or current use of chemotherapy or radiation in the head and neck area, history of or current use of medication related to osteonecrosis of the jaw, smoking (\> 5 cigarettes a day, disability (physical and/or mental), making the patient unable to maintain basic oral health or follow the study protocol, pregnancy (in case of pregnancy, the treatment is postponed until after the delivery). Intervention (if applicable): Atraumatic extraction of a (pre)molar in the posterior mandible will be performed. Patients will then be included based on the dimensions of the buccal bone defect (buccal bone defect of \>50%). 66 patients will be randomly divided in either the XG group, the AG group or the SH group (control). In the ARP groups (XG and AG), following tooth extraction, ARP will be performed using either a XG (Cerabone plus) or an AG (Maxgraft granules), both covered by a membrane (Jason membrane). In the control group, the alveolus will be left for spontaneous healing, following tooth extraction. After 4-6 months, a cone bean computed tomography (CBCT) scan will be performed to determine the possibility of implant placement with or without additional augmentation. Implant placement will be performed in all groups with or without guided bone regeneration (GBR). Main study parameters/endpoints: Frequency of additional augmentation at implant placement.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-06-03
1 state
NCT06970184
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Cortico-cancellous Porcine Bone
Observational, prospective study conducted on patients requiring tooth extractions followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-05-20
1 state
NCT06879171
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft From Extracted Tooth Combined With Simvastatin 1:1 Versus Autogenous Tooth Graft
This study will be held to overcome the previous limitations related to bone loss after teeth extraction by taking advantages from both Autogenous tooth graft and Simvastatin which will offer a promising synergistic approach for reducing alveolar ridge resorption, enhance bone regeneration and ensuring implant site development for future implant placement. This combination will address the gap in knowledge and offering a novel approach in alveolar ridge preservation. The Autogenous tooth graft will provide a scaffold and growth factor source for bone regeneration while Simvastatin will promotes osteogensis and angiogensis at graft site. So The goal of the present trial aims to evaluate the first-time application of Autogenous tooth graft from extracted tooth combined with Simvastatin with a ratio 1:1(test group) versus Autogenous tooth graft alone (control group) at an extraction socket of non molar single rooted teeth for alveolar ridge preservation and implant site development prior to implant placement. The participants will be divided into two groups: Intervention Group will receive Autogenous tooth graft combine with Simvastatin with a ratio 1:1 Control Group will receive Autogenous tooth graft. with follow up period 4 months.
Gender: All
Ages: 20 Years - 45 Years
Updated: 2025-05-20
NCT06827665
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Allogenic Dentin Grafts for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
For the first time, allografts from human-extracted teeth will be prepared and evaluated in a prospective clinical trial to assess their efficacy for alveolar ridge preservation. The reconstruction and preservation of the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction are essential for future prosthetic rehabilitation. Autogenous bone grafts, while effective, are limited by donor site morbidity and insufficient graft quantity. Allogenic dentin grafts from healthy human donors present a scalable solution. This study aims to evaluate the biocompatibility and effectiveness of two types of allogenic dentin grafts-demineralized dentin allografts (DDA) and whole tooth allografts (WTA)-for alveolar ridge preservation, contributing to innovative, sustainable dental practices.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years
Updated: 2025-02-14
NCT06784232
Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation Vs Modified Periosteal Inhibition
The modified periosteal inhibition technique has been proposed as an alternative to limit crestal resorption following tooth extraction in sockets with a residual vestibular thickness of \<1 mm. This technique aims to prevent osteolytic activity on the external surface of a post-extraction socket by applying a 0.5 mm-thick soft cortical plate of porcine origin, secured with fibrin glue. By avoiding the placement of bone graft material inside the socket, the technique seeks to effectively counteract bone remodeling, achieving minimal reduction in the size of the alveolar crest. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the modified periosteal inhibition technique in preserving the dimensions of the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction, by comparing it with the Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation technique.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 80 Years
Updated: 2025-01-22
1 state
NCT06141239
2D/3D Imaging to Analyze the Regeneration Rate of Autologous Bone
Place a collagen plug (collagen plug) in the lower 2/3 to 1/2 of your tooth extraction site while giving you Vit. The extracted teeth are made into autogenous tooth root thin slices and covered in your tooth extraction cavity, and the skin flap raised by your flap surgery is used to cover the autologous tooth root cover to help the autologous tooth roots stabilize and heal the wound, which is different from traditional surgery. The difference in treatment lies in the local use of autogenous tooth root thin slices and Vit.D3. Collagen plug and Vit.D3 are already qualified medical materials and drugs on the market. However, there is no precedent for making thin autologous tooth root slices. will be a trial of a new medical technology that has not yet been used
Gender: All
Ages: 20 Years - 70 Years
Updated: 2024-12-02
NCT06435754
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Vestibular Socket Preservation Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique for Management of Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes following vestibular socket preservation versus ice cream cone technique for management of defective fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 40 Years
Updated: 2024-07-16