Clinical Research Directory

Remifentanil vs Fentanyl in Children 7-12 After Urologic Surgery: Emergence Delirium and Recovery Quality

Emergence delirium (agitation) is a common complication in children recovering from general anesthesia, especially after sevoflurane. Affected children wake in a dissociative state - restless, crying, inconsolable, unaware of their surroundings - with a reported incidence of 25-80%. It raises the risk of self-injury, accidental catheter removal, vomiting, and maladaptive behavior persisting for weeks, and prolongs hospital stay. Short-acting opioids such as fentanyl and remifentanil are widely used in pediatric anesthesia for sedation and analgesia and to blunt the hemodynamic response to surgical stimulation and airway instrumentation. Both have been proposed to reduce emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia, but findings for remifentanil are inconsistent: some studies report a reduction, others an increase. Clinicians therefore lack clear guidance on opioid selection for maintenance. This trial compares intraoperative remifentanil with intraoperative fentanyl maintenance on the occurrence of emergence delirium in children undergoing urologic surgery under general anesthesia. Secondary aims are postoperative recovery, duration of surgery, and intraoperative hemodynamics. Design: single-center randomized controlled trial. 176 children aged 7-12 years, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective pediatric urologic surgery, randomized 1:1 (88 per group). All participants receive the same background technique: intravenous midazolam 0.05 mg/kg five minutes before entering the operating room; standard monitoring (ECG, pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure, capnography); induction with propofol 3-5 mg/kg; laryngeal mask airway (LMA); sevoflurane titrated to 1 MAC; and preemptive intravenous paracetamol and ketamine 0.3 mg/kg after induction. The fentanyl group receives fentanyl 1 mcg/kg after loss of consciousness, then 1 mcg/kg every 30 minutes until the end of surgery. The remifentanil group receives remifentanil 0.5 mcg/kg, then an infusion of 1 mcg/kg/min. In both groups the LMA is inserted 90 seconds after the bolus. At the end of surgery sevoflurane is discontinued and the LMA removed once the child breathes regularly and moves purposefully without stimulation. Emergence delirium is assessed in the post-anesthesia care unit with the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale (0-20). Additional measurements include time from sevoflurane discontinuation to LMA removal, time to eye opening on verbal stimulus, and readiness for discharge.

Does Style of Pre-sedation Instructions Improve Patient Outcomes in Ambulatory Anesthesia for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery?

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the impact of a brief guided visualization exercise on anesthesia-related outcomes in oral and maxillofacial surgery in patients scheduled for ambulatory anesthesia in the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic. Researchers will compare these patients, who will receive the guided visualization exercise in addition to standardized pre-operative instructions, to patients who will only receive the standardized pre-operative instructions. The following outcomes will be measured for both groups: * A seven-point Anesthesia Experience Survey * Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability (FLACC) scores at three points in time during the anesthetic - during local anesthesia, during surgery, and fifteen minutes after surgery has concluded * Amount of medications used during the sedation * Length of sedation

Site of Tracheal Extubation and Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-assisted Surgery

This study aims to evaluate the impact of different extubation strategy on the occupancy time of operating room (OR) and the incidence of adverse events and quality of recovery after robotic-assisted surgery. The investigators hypothesize that extubation in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) may reduce OR occupancy time without increasing adverse events or worsening quality of recovery early after robotic-assisted surgery. This strategy may enhance perioperative efficiency while maintaining clinical safety.

Guiding Opioid Administration by Nociception Level Index (NOL) in Patients With Regional Anesthesia

General anesthesia consists of a combination of hypnotic drugs to achieve unconsciousness and opioid analgesics to ensure antinociception. An alternative approach to the intraoperative administration of high-potency opioids to achieve antinociception during surgery is combining general anesthesia with regional anesthesia. Modern general anesthesia aims to avoid an overdose of opioid analgesics and reduce side effects of opioid administration. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and can be improved by adjusting the opioid analgesics to the optimal individual dose needed. In current clinical practice, opioid dosage is usually determined by clinical judgment. However, different monitoring devices estimating the effect of nociception during unconsciousness have become commercially available. One of the most recent commercially available nociception indices is the Nociception Level Index (NOL). Until today, there is conflicting evidence on whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring, which is the intended use of the nociception index, affects postoperative pain level in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the amount of postoperatively administered opioids, and the quality of postoperative recovery in patients with a combination of general and regional anesthesia. This study aims to investigate the clinical performance of intraoperative NOL monitoring and determine whether guiding sufentanil administration by NOL monitoring - compared to routine care - reduces either postoperative pain level in the PACU, postoperative opioid consumption in the PACU or postoperative opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation in patients having trauma and orthopedic surgery with combined general and regional anesthesia.

Comparing Effect of Opioid-sparing Versus Conventional Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Emergency Laparotomy

Aim of the Work The investigators aim to compare lidocaine-based anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia protocol in terms of early quality of recovery and analgesic efficacy. Objectives To compare quality of recovery using the Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score between lidocaine-based anesthesia in relation to conventional anesthesia in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Hypothesis the investigators hypothesize that lidocaine-based regimen would be effective in reducing opioid use and provide superior quality of recovery compared to conventional opioid-routine anesthesia in emergency laparotomy.