Clinical Research Directory

Analysis of the Therapeutic and Clinical Profile of Cannabinoid Treatments: A Real-World Study

What is the purpose of this study? The use of medicinal cannabis has grown significantly in Brazil. However, because many patients use these products through "compassionate use" (when traditional treatments haven't worked), there is still a lack of large-scale data on how these treatments perform in daily life. This study, called CANAREAL, aims to track patients across Brazil to understand if cannabis-based products are truly effective and safe for treating various conditions, such as chronic pain, anxiety, and depression. How will the study work? This is an observational study, which means the researchers will not provide the medication or change the treatment prescribed by the patient's doctor. Instead, we will simply "follow" the patient's journey for 6 months. What will participants be asked to do? Participants will complete online questionnaires at different stages of their treatment. These tools will measure: Quality of Life: How the treatment affects daily well-being. Clinical Evolution: Changes in pain levels, anxiety, and depression symptoms. Safety: Whether the patient experiences any side effects (adverse events). Why is this study important? Unlike controlled laboratory tests, this "Real-World Study" captures the reality of diverse patients with different backgrounds and health needs. The information gathered will help doctors, patients, and health authorities in Brazil better understand the benefits and risks of cannabinoid therapy, leading to safer and more informed medical decisions in the future.

Improvement of Quality of Life by Cannabinoids in Oncologic Patients

The goal is to explore whether the application of cannabis extract Avextra 10/10 solution is suitable to contribute to an improvement in the symptom burden and well-being of oncological palliative care patients. The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate the improvement in global symptom burden in the intervention arm compared to the placebo control group over a period of 12±2 days, as measured by a percentage change in the value of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System total symptom distress score (ESAS TSDS) at baseline and after 12±2 days.