Clinical Research Directory

Low Dose of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone in Adult Cardiogenic Shock.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of low dose corticosteroid therapy (hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone) in the treatment of adult cardiogenic shock.

Altshock-2 REGISTRY

The study will provide data on profile, management, outcome, and evolution over time of cardiogenic shock patients admitted to the Intensive Coronary Care Units

Randomized Evaluation of Istaroxime for Stabilization in Acute Heart Failure-Cardiogenic Shock

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the drug istaroxime works to treat mild to moderate cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure in adults. It will also learn about the safety of istaroxime. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does istaroxime relieve participants' shortness of breath compared to a placebo? * Does istaroxime provide clinical benefit in terms of lowering the risk of dying, having invasive procedures, having worsening heart failure, and/or increasing quality of life compared to a placebo? * Does istaroxime increase blood pressure compared to a placebo? Researchers will compare istaroxime to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if istaroxime works to treat mild to moderate cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure. Participants will: * Receive a 48-hour intravenous infusion of istaroxime or placebo * Complete questionnaires rating their breathing and describing their quality of life * Return for a visit 30 and 90 days after the initial drug infusion was started

Catheter-Oriented Unloading and Recovery With a Left Ventricular Assist Gear: Efficacy in Post Cardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock

This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial conducted in China to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel left ventricular assist device, SynFlow Duro system, manufactured by ForQaly Medical in the treatment of post cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Improving Sedation Practice in Critically Ill Adult Patients Using a Co-designed Sedation Protocol

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. The investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: * To describe current sedation use in ECMO patients in the UK and compare to non-ECMO critically ill patients. * To develop a sedation protocol for ECMO patients with input from patients, their family, and staff. Design/methods: Study 1: The investigators will study how sedation is used in adult ECMO patients and compare with non-ECMO but critically ill patients in the UK. The investigators will collect information on drug doses and pain and sedation scores. The investigators will also ask ECMO centres if they use a sedation protocol to adjust sedation doses. This information will be helpful for the design of the protocol in study 2. Study 2: The investigators will design a sedation protocol with input from patients, family, and staff. The investigators will organise meetings to share experiences and agree on what to include in the protocol that is considered acceptable and safe. The investigators will then assess if the protocol is safe and acceptable with staff outside the co-design group. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family members which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. Patients and family members will continue to help with development of the sedation and trial protocol. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

Augmented Pacing for Shock in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if backup pacing at an increased rate improves hemodynamics in adults with relative bradycardia, a permanent pacemaker, and cardiogenic shock. The main question it aims to answer is: Does increasing the backup pacing rate to 100 beats per minute lead to improved cardiac index compared to a backup pacing rate of 75 beats per minute Participants who are already hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit with a permanent pacemaker and pulmonary artery catheter in place will be enrolled in this study. Participants will be exposed to each pacemaker rate in a randomized order with hemodynamics assessed after 10 minutes at each rate.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Inotrope Dependent Cardiogenic Shock

Mitral regurgitation may be seen in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Observational studies suggest improvements in clinical outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation in the setting of cardiogenic shock; however, there remains a lack of randomized clinical data to support the use of TEER in cardiogenic shock. This study will be a multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled trial with two study arms: medical therapy and TEER. Patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU), Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit (CSICU) or Intensive Care Units (ICU) at participating centers will be recruited. The study aims to answer the question: "Does TEER in patients with SCAI stage C or D cardiogenic with concomitant moderate or greater mitral regurgitation improve outcomes as compared to medical therapy?" The study hypothesis is that TEER will lead to an overall improvement in the composite outcome as compared to the medical therapy arm.

Platelet Function and Impella Support

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with the Impella microaxial pump in the setting of cardiogenic shock/cardiac arrest (CS/CA) is accompanied by substantial risk of life-threatening complications, including hemolysis, thrombotic and bleeding events. Previous studies in patients on durable MCS suggest that device-induced platelet dysfunction plays a major contributory role in the development of such events and that selected markers of platelet function have the potential to stratify patients according to an elevated risk of adverse events. To date, the potential clinical utility of markers of altered platelet function in patients supported with an Impella pump is unexplored. The proposed study will analyze changes in platelet function in the setting of Impella support (primary aim) and possibly identify a platelet function "profile" indicative of patients at high-risk to develop adverse events (secondary aim). The study is a prospective observational study. Changes in the expression levels of markers of both platelet activation and aggregation in patients supported with an Impella pump will be measured. Data will be longitudinally measured: pre-implant (before Impella implantation) and then after 24, 48 and 72h of Impella support. Markers that will be analyzed include surface platelet receptors and platelet microRNAs. Experimental data will be correlated with clinical outcomes, including the occurrence of adverse events. This study will provide mechanistic insights into the effect of Impella support on the protein and miRNA expression of platelets. The intention is to get a better understanding of distinct pathways of platelet function related to Impella support and their relationship to adverse events. Our data might open the perspective for the future clinical use of markers of platelet function to enhance the early recognition of patients at high risk of developing an adverse event and the definition of novel, personalized therapeutic strategies targeted to platelet biology to prevent their occurrence.

Physiology of Unloading VA ECMO Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) with and without left ventricular (LV) unloading in patients being treated for cardiogenic shock (CS). The main aims of the study are: 1. To determine the physiologic effects on cardiopulmonary congestion of adding LV unloading to VA ECMO 2. To determine the effects on myocardial function of adding LV unloading to ECMO 3. To test the effects on myocardial recovery of adding LV unloading to VA ECMO Participants who are being treated with VA ECMO will be randomized to receive or not receive LV unloading in the form of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). Over the course of the study, the investigators will obtain measurements via lab work, echocardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter that will allow comparison of the two groups.

INitiation and Titration of Guideline Directed Medical TheRApy in HearT Failure Cardiogenic Shock With ImpElla 5.5 for Cardiac Recovery

The study will evaluate the impact of a combined device-drug strategy with Impella 5.5 with best practices and optimized GDMT on heart recovery outcomes in patients with decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

Transcatheter AortiC Valve Implantation in aorTic stenosIs CardiogenIc Shock

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if acute transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is superior to standard treatment (stabilization in an intensive care unit and TAVI subsequently) to treat cardiogenic shock in patients with critical severe aortic stenosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does acute TAVI increase survival compared with standard treatment? Participants will: * Undergo either TAVI within 12 hours after admission or stabilization and TAVI 72 hours or more after admission * Visit an outpatient clinic and be evaluated for quality of life and heart function

Can Escalation Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock

The CERAMICS study is designed to more clearly delineate the current care of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMICS) patients who are treated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in the United States with significant experience in MCS, all of whom have the capability of MCS escalation on-site. Study enrollment is targeted at 120 patients at 20 hospital sites, evaluating clinical outcomes, and focusing on outcomes MCS escalation decision making and ICU level management.

Multimodal Phenotyping In Patients Referred With Acute Cardiac faiLurE

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether information collected during routine hospital care, together with blood and urine samples, can help doctors better identify different types of cardiogenic shock and better predict outcomes in adults hospitalized with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The main question is whether clinical findings, imaging results, and biomarkers, including sex-specific factors, are associated with the risk of death within 30 days. Participants will not receive an experimental treatment. Researchers will collect data from routine care, collect additional blood and urine samples for biobanking, and follow participants after hospital discharge

Characterisation of phenotYpes in aCute Heart faiLure patiEnts

An observational cohort study to evaluate the benefit of functional parameters, radiomics and blood biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients with acute heart failure.

Personalisation of Mean Arterial Pressure in Adult Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by inadequate cardiac output, leading to organ hypoperfusion and high mortality. Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) is crucial, but standard targets may be insufficient due to venous congestion. Central venous pressure (CVP) can help assess effective perfusion pressure. This study investigates whether a personalized MAP target adjusted by CVP improves organ function and survival compared to standard MAP management.

Clinical Outcome and Cost-effectiveness of Reduced Noradrenaline by Using a Lower Blood Pressure Target in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock From Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rationale: Pump failure due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can lead to cardiogenic shock (CS): a state of low blood flow to end-organs with subsequent multi-organ failure that is associated with high mortality rated. The first line pharmacologic treatment strategy in CS is noradrenaline. This vasopressor drug is used to maintain adequate blood pressures. The assumption is that a mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg will improve flow and thereby tissue perfusion of myocardium and other tissues (e.g. renal). However, there is no evidence that an increase in MAP, if achieved by noradrenaline, leads to greater end-organ blood flow and better outcomes. Objective: With this study the investigators aim to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of reduced noradrenaline in patients with CS by using a lower MAP target of ≥ 55 mmHg, compared to ≥ 65 mmHg. The investigators hypothesize that reduced use of noradrenaline will improve overall survival and decrease renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Study design: Open label, randomized controlled multicenter trial Study population: Adults patients with CS due to AMI Intervention: Treatment strategy of reduced noradrenaline, by using a lower MAP target ( ≥ 55 mmHg). Main study endpoint: composite of all-cause mortality and severe renal failure leading to renal replacement therapy within 30-days after randomization.

Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

A prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized controlled, superiority trial to compare clinical outcomes between routine distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion versus provisional distal perfusion catheter (DPC) insertion in the occurrence of sign or symptom of acute limb ischemia in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) through femoral artery approach.

Multi-center Collaborative to Enhance Quality and Outcomes in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

This large real-world international prospective registry will provide a unique opportunity to comprehensively understand the contemporary management, clinical course and short as well as long-term outcomes of all Cardiogenic Shock (CS) patients cared for at four high volume dedicated shock care centers. As the first true North American multicenter CS collaborative with a uniform dedicated and comprehensive case report form, the high patient volumes and wide spectrum of clinical acuity seen at these institutions will provide valuable insight into the factors associated with adverse outcomes; and will serve as a blueprint for future clinical trial designs that may better inform clinical practice.

Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm

This study aims to better understand how mechanical ventilation settings affect patients admitted to the coronary care unit after cardiac arrest or with cardiogenic shock. These patients often require mechanical ventilation, but current guidelines provide limited evidence on the best approach. Improper ventilation settings can lead to acid-base imbalances, such as respiratory acidosis or alkalosis, which may worsen patient outcomes. The retrospective analysis will include 100 adult patients (50 post-cardiac arrest and 50 with cardiogenic shock) who were mechanically ventilated upon admission. The study has two main objectives: Determine how often acid-base disorders occur in these patients and describe their characteristics. Compare the initial ventilator settings chosen by clinicians with those suggested by VentilO, a decision-support algorithm. The investigators will evaluate the potential effect of the VentilO recommendations on the first arterial (or capillary) blood gases compared to the real settings. This information will help refine the algorithm and guide future research on improving ventilation strategies for critically ill cardiac patients. Participation does not involve any intervention, as the study uses existing medical records.

Hemodynamic Monitoring to Prevent Adverse Events foLlowing cardiOgenic Shock Trial

Pilot Prospective Randomized Unblinded Pragmatic Trial of Pulmonary Artery Hemodynamic Monitoring Following Hospitalization for Cardiogenic Shock

Inova Cardiogenic Shock Registry (INOVA SHOCK)

To collect retrospective clinical outcomes related to acute decompensated heart failure cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock and compare current versus historical survival rates. To collect Inova Heart and Vascular Institute (IHVI) site specific outcomes before and after initiation of the Cardiogenic Shock team on January 1, 2017. To collect outcomes related to implementation of mechanical circulatory support versus no circulatory intervention and type of intervention (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) versus intracorporeal axial-flow (Impella). • Assess survival at three time points.

CORTISHOCK-P: Trial of Corticosteroids in Inflammation-Enriched Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock

This pilot study investigates whether giving a short course of intravenous corticosteroids (methylprednisolone) alongside standard medical care can help patients recovering from heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock happens when chronic heart dysfunction causes poor blood circulation and congestion throughout the body. Often, this condition triggers severe inflammation, making it harder for the heart and other organs to recover, even when temporary mechanical heart pumps are used to support blood flow. The study aims to see if reducing this inflammation with corticosteroids is safe and can help patients get better faster. Researchers will enroll 30 adult patients hospitalized with early-stage (SCAI Stage B or C) cardiogenic shock related to heart failure. To participate, patients must also show high levels of inflammation in their blood, specifically a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level of 20 mg/L or higher Participants will be randomly assigned by chance to one of two groups. One group will receive the standard of care alone. The other group will receive the standard of care plus a 7-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone. The main goal of the study is to measure the change in inflammation levels (hsCRP) over 7 days. Researchers will also monitor how well the patients' organs recover, track their need for blood pressure medications or mechanical heart pumps, and monitor for any side effects to ensure the treatment is safe

Effect of Early Empagliflozin Initiation in Cardiogenic Shock.

Cardiogenic shock represents a severe condition of heart pump dysfunction. Despite advances in medical management, the mortality rate for this condition remains high. Conventional treatments for cardiovascular diseases have several side effects that make their use impossible in patients with cardiogenic shock. A new class of drugs has been developed in recent years and is an integral part of the management of patients with chronic heart failure. These are sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors), namely empagliflozin and dapagliflozin. This therapeutic class has proven effective in reducing mortality as well as hospital readmissions for heart failure patients. Given their effectiveness in acute heart failure, which is physiologically closest to the cardiogenic shock population, and their good tolerance, SGLT2 inhibitors are increasingly being prescribed to patients with cardiogenic shock to improve long-term outcomes. In order to improve medical knowledge and the management of patients in cardiogenic shock, the main objective of this research is to compare, in these patients, the effect of the early introduction of treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors), in addition to usual care, versus usual care alone, on all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure at 12 weeks.

Magenta Elevate™ Clinical Feasibility Study in Cardiogenic Shock

The Elevate™ CS Clinical Feasibility Study is designed to evaluate the initial safety, effectiveness, and device performance of the Magenta Elevate™ System in patients with cardiogenic shock due to isolated or predominant left ventricular failure.