Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
6 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 6 Connective Tissue Graft clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT06335628
Volumetric Dimensional Changes After Surgical Pontic Site Development Procedures With Connective Tissue Graft or Collagen Matrix
The aim of this research project is to compare two surgical procedures to improve soft tissue volume. Both procedures have already been validated, but despite their great clinical relevance, little data exists in the literature. With this study, the investigators aim to evaluate volumetric changes of connective tissue graft versus biomaterial (membrane). In addition, further clinical measurements will be taken and patient satisfaction will be assessed.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-18
NCT07415486
Immediate Implants in Front Teeth With Bone Loss: Regeneration and Temporary Crown in a Randomized Clinical Study
This clinical trial investigates the biological and clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement in aesthetic areas presenting with buccal bone dehiscence. Traditionally, these defects are treated with a bone graft and covered using a collagen membrane; however, there is ongoing debate about whether the membrane is necessary for optimal regeneration. This study proposes the use of a connective tissue graft instead of a collagen membrane, aiming to improve soft tissue volume and aesthetics without compromising bone healing. The objective of the study is to evaluate whether the use of an autogenous connective tissue graft in combination with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen (DBBM-C) achieves results that are not inferior to the conventional protocol that uses DBBM-C and a collagen membrane. The main outcome variable is the vertical buccal bone gain measured after twelve months of healing. The study design is a randomized controlled clinical trial including twenty-four patients divided equally into two groups. Each participant will attend eight follow-up visits over twelve months. After atraumatic tooth extraction, immediate implants (BLC, Straumann) will be placed using a prosthetically guided protocol. Buccal dehiscence will be measured intraoperatively, and a partial-thickness tunnel flap will be prepared to allow soft tissue adaptation and graft placement. In the control group, the defect will be filled with DBBM-C and covered with a collagen membrane stabilized with horizontal mattress sutures. In the test group, the defect will receive DBBM-C covered by a connective tissue graft harvested from the palate and fixed in a similar manner. When primary stability is equal to or greater than 35 N/cm, an immediate screw-retained provisional crown will be delivered; if stability is lower, a customized healing abutment or Maryland-type provisional will be used instead. After three months, digital impressions will be taken to fabricate the definitive zirconia restoration. All restorative steps will be performed by experienced clinicians using a standardized digital workflow. Patients will follow routine postoperative care instructions, including soft diet and restricted brushing in the surgical area for one week. The main benefits of this study include advancing the understanding of regeneration strategies for buccal bone dehiscence and improving clinical decision-making in immediate implant protocols. Participants are also expected to benefit from implant-supported rehabilitation, functional restoration, and aesthetic improvement. The potential risks are minimal and limited to typical surgical complications such as discomfort, swelling, or minor infection, which will be managed following established clinical protocols. If a patient declines participation, conventional implant treatment will be offered, or alternative prosthetic options such as fixed or removable restorations will be provided. Any intra- or postoperative complications during the study will be treated promptly and documented according to institutional standards. The biomaterials used include BLC Straumann implants, Bio-Oss Collagen (DBBM-C), Bio-Gide collagen membranes, and appropriate suture materials. Procedures will employ standard periodontal and tunneling instruments, as well as a digital intraoral scanner for accurate prosthetic fabrication. Statistical analysis will involve descriptive and inferential methods. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will assess normality, and mixed ANOVA models will evaluate differences between groups and across time points. Covariate adjustment will be performed using ANCOVA when necessary, and intra- and inter-examiner reliability will be tested with the intraclass correlation coefficient. The level of statistical significance will be set at 0.05. The expected outcome is that the use of an autogenous connective tissue graft will demonstrate bone regeneration results equivalent to those obtained with a collagen membrane, while potentially improving soft tissue thickness and aesthetic integration. This finding would support the clinical use of soft tissue grafts as an alternative to collagen membranes in immediate implant placement within aesthetic regions showing buccal dehiscence. All study procedures follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical standards for human clinical research. Participants will receive detailed information about the study protocol and will sign informed consent before inclusion. In summary, this study aims to determine whether a connective tissue graft can safely replace a collagen membrane in the management of buccal dehiscence during immediate implant placement, offering comparable regenerative outcomes with possible superior soft tissue aesthetics.
Gender: All
Ages: 25 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-17
NCT07303374
Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla
The present study aims to compare the dimensional stability of the supra-implant complex following flapless immediate implant placement using two socket management approaches: the connective tissue graft and the socket shield technique. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be employed to assess and quantify changes in soft and hard tissue thickness and height surrounding the implant site.
Gender: All
Ages: 21 Years - 50 Years
Updated: 2025-12-24
NCT07203326
Microderm for Root Coverage Procedures
This randomized pilot study will compare Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and a microsurfaced Acellular Dermal Matrix (mADM) for wound healing, root coverage, gum tissue coverage of the surgical site, blood flow to the site, and patient comfort.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2025-11-26
1 state
NCT06926452
Clinical and Volumetric Changes Following Single Pontic Site Development Using Multilayered Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Grafting in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
In clinical practice most patients' first concern is esthetics, soft tissue grafting is becoming routine in clinical practice to make up for the deficiency in supra-crestal tissue dimension that typically follows tooth loss. The edentulous site experiences major qualitative and quantitative changes because of a number of sequential events that occur after tooth extraction. Ridge dimensional alterations of the underlying bone and the soft tissue architecture overlaying it are the consequence of the socket healing process. To maintain the remaining teeth, aesthetic jaw support and optimal food chewing, lost teeth must be replaced. The teeth adjacent to and opposing a missing tooth will eventually tip, shift, and migrate, disrupting normal function. One integral part of the new strategy for treating periodontal diseases is thought to be surgical periodontal operations. Soft tissue grafting has become more frequently utilized to improve the aesthetics of teeth and dental implant sites by treating mucogingival abnormalities, restoring an appropriate width of keratinized tissue, and enhancing tissue thickness. SCTG has its own limitations, such as lack of graft availability, need for a second surgical site, proximity to palatine neurovascular complex and unaesthetic tissue contour at the recipient site. Due to these limitations, investigations on more regenerative nature techniques have been explored such as PRF, Using PRF instead of SCTG has the added value of decreasing discomfort and postoperative pain after the surgical procedure due to having additional donor site, To the best of our knowledge testing multi-layer PRF against SCTG in pontic site augmentation was never done before.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 80 Years
Updated: 2025-04-13
NCT06588998
Xengenic Cortical Membranes Versus Connective Tissue Graft With Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences represent a common complication in implant dentistry, often leading to esthetic and functional challenges. Current treatment options, including Xengenic cortical membranes and connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap, aim to promote soft tissue regeneration and improve clinical outcomes. However, there is a need for comparative studies to determine the optimal treatment modality for peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences.
Gender: All
Ages: 20 Years - 50 Years
Updated: 2024-09-19
1 state