Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
4 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 4 Dental Prosthesis Failure clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT06713577
Clinical Study of a 3D Shaded Zirconia for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations
This investigation will be a prospective, longitudinal clinical trial to study the clinical performance of a new monolithic, 3D shaded zirconia material for computer assisted design and computer assisted machining for chairside restorations. The restorations will be evaluated for a period of up to five years. The study is called Clinical Study of a 3D Shaded Zirconia for chairside computer assisted design and computer assisted machining (CAD/CAM) chairside restorations intended to be part of the validation plan and post market follow-up of the following products: CEREC Cercon 4D, Calibra Universal +, and Prime and Bond Active.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2026-03-09
1 state
NCT05752539
Clinical Evaluation of Implants Restored With Advanced Lithium Disilicate Screw-retained Crowns
This is a prospective observational clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of the Cerec Tessera prosthetic assembly on implants restored with chairside CAD/CAM-generated crowns. This investigation is intended as a Post Market Clinical Follow-up study for the product Cerec Tessera and its prosthetic assembly for implants, which will serve as a life-cycle approach to safety, backed up by clinical data and post-market monitoring.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2025-08-12
1 state
NCT01729858
Survival of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Prostheses
The purpose of this research study is to identify reasons that cause an all-ceramic bridge to fracture which include the thickness of the bridge material, the type of bridge material and the bite force of the person. This all-ceramic bridge will be compared to a metal-ceramic bridge. The investigators are conducting this study so we can make bridges which can withstand forces in the mouth which tend to break them. The overall objective of this research is to analyze how properties of ceramic materials and different forces in the mouth interact with each other to affect the longevity of these bridges. These include fracture toughness, elastic modulus of ceramic layers and supporting substrate, core thickness, connector height, wear, loading orientation, and maximum clenching force.
Gender: All
Ages: 21 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2025-06-15
1 state
NCT05296291
RCT: Titanium vs FCZ vs Zirconia Framework
In recent years, zirconia-based implant-supported bridge designs have begun to be used more and more as an alternative to metal ceramic bridges. Another new material that has been introduced in the clinic is the high translucent monolithic zirconia, which has only been investigated a few follow-up studies with short follow up duration. The aim being to evaluate the clinical outcome of implant-anchored posterior bridges, made from 1. high-translucent monolithic zirconia, 2. zirconia ceramic with porcelain and 3. metal ceramics. The hypothesis is that high-translucent monolithic zirconia has lower rate of complications since surface porcelain veneering is not required. A total of 60 research subjects will be included in the study. Patients in need of a permanent implant-supported bridge, located posterior of the canine in the upper or lower jaw will be asked for participation. Each subject will be treated according to standard treatment protocols with implants from Nobel Biocare, the Branemark implant system and then be randomly assigned to obtain one of the following three type of bridges. 20 research subjects will be included in each of the three study arms. The prosthetic treatment will be carried out according to standard clinic protocol. All research subjects will be evaluated after 1, 3, 5 years. X-rays and photos will be taken at the installation of the bridges and after 1 and 5 years of follow-up or more frequent, depending on individual indication of the patient and the associated standard clinical care protocol. Personal data, implant survival, marginal bone loss and biological and technical complications related to the implants will be recorded. Survival of the bridge, technical and biological complication related to the bridge will also be recorded
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 100 Years
Updated: 2022-03-25