Clinical Research Directory

Emsella Chair vs Sham for Male Sexual Dysfunction

We will be performing this study in 2 phases: Phase 1 will be an open label pilot study of 10 male participants. All participants in the pilot study will receive active treatment. If data from the pilot study is suggestive of symptom improvement, we will continue on to phase 2, which is a sham controlled, randomized blinded study. Participants in phase 2 will be randomized to receive either active treatment or sham. Potentially a total of 117 participants for both phases will be enrolled. The purpose of this study is to compare the Emsella Chair to sham and to determine whether electromagnetic technology is effective in the treatment of sexual dysfunction, specifically erectile dysfunction (EjD) in men.

Water Vapor Thermal Therapy Versus Ejaculation-Sparing Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

This prospective comparative study will evaluate Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (WVTT/Rezum) versus Ejaculation-Sparing Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate (ES-B-TUEP) in sexually active men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eligible patients will have moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms, preserved antegrade ejaculation at baseline, and will be candidates for procedural treatment after failure, intolerance, or unwillingness to continue medical therapy. This is not a randomized study. Treatment selection will be based on shared decision-making between the patient and the treating surgeon after standardized counseling about both procedures. The study will compare ejaculatory function, urinary symptom improvement, urinary flow, post-void residual urine, erectile function, perioperative outcomes, complications, catheterization duration, hospital stay, medication restart, and retreatment or reintervention during follow-up. The primary outcome will be the change in the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction Short Form Function domain score from baseline to 12 months.

Clinical Outcomes and Ejaculatory Function in BPO Patients Treated With Silodosin

This observational study aims to evaluate the relationship between silodosin-induced anejaculation and clinical outcomes in male patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Silodosin is a commonly used alpha-blocker for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, it may cause ejaculatory dysfunction, particularly anejaculation. In this study, patients receiving silodosin for the first time will be grouped based on whether they experience anejaculation or not. Treatment response will be assessed using urinary flow rate, post-void residual urine, and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Sexual function will be evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) before and after treatment. The study aims to explore whether the presence of anejaculation is associated with improved symptom relief or differences in sexual health.

Ejaculatory and Orgasmic Dysfunction Registry

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of various therapies used to treat ejaculatory and/or orgasmic dysfunctions in men. The objective is to create a large, national registry designed to capture key outcomes for men being treated for ejaculatory and/or orgasmic dysfunction. Participants will submit questionnaires about their diagnosis and treatment efficacy and multiple time intervals.