Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
2 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 2 Fluid Reponsiveness clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07797751
This Study Compares Two Noninvasive Dynamic Tools: Lung Ultrasound and Transthoracic Echocardiography Using LVOT VTI. It Aims to Measure the Sensitivity and Specificity of LUS in Guiding Fluid Resuscitation and Early Detection of Fluid Responsiveness and to Prevent Volume Overload
Reliability of the LVOT-VTI versus lung ultrasonography for early detection of fluid intolerance during fluid resuscitation of septic patients.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Hours - Any
Updated: 2026-09-01
NCT06900972
Effect of Colloids Versus Crystalloids on Heart Mechanics: a Double-blind Cross Over Randomized Trial
The debate over whether to use colloid or crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitationis still ongoing. Colloid solutions consist of large molecules that generally cannot pass through healthy capillary membranes, whereas crystalloid solutions contain ions that easily move from the intravascular space to the interstitial compartment. Therefore, it is traditionally argued that colloids are more effective at expanding intravascular volume, with a suggested ratio of 1:3 compared to crystalloids. However, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that resuscitation with one type of fluid is more effective or safer than t he other. Despite these theoretically advantageousphysiological properties, colloids have not demonstrated a clear hemodynamic benefit over crystalloids. We hypothesized that these unexpected discrepancies may be attributed to different mechanical heart responses.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 60 Years
Updated: 2025-03-28
1 state