Clinical Research Directory

Preserflo MicroShunt Versus Trabeculectomy

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn whether two minimally invasive bleb-forming glaucoma implants can effectively treat adult patients with open-angle glaucoma who require surgical lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP). Specifically, the study evaluates whether the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt is at least as effective as the trabeculectomy in reducing IOP after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt provide IOP reduction at 12 months that is non-inferior to trabeculectomy? How do these two surgeries compare over 12 months with respect to medication reduction, need for additional glaucoma procedures, complications, and preservation of visual function and ocular structures? Participants will: Be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the trabeculectomy or the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt during a single glaucoma surgery. Attend scheduled follow-up visits over 12 months for eye-pressure measurements, vision testing, visual-field testing, OCT imaging, endothelial-cell counts, and safety assessments. Receive standard postoperative care and report any complications or additional treatments during the study period.

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Mild to Moderate Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery With EDOF Versus Monofocal IOLs

Cataract is the leading cause of reversible vision loss, while glaucoma remains the primary cause of irreversible blindness, often impairing contrast sensitivity (CS), glare tolerance, and dark adaptation. These visual challenges are particularly relevant when selecting intraocular lenses (IOLs) for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the safest and most commonly used option for glaucoma patients due to their optical simplicity and low incidence of photic phenomena, though they do not provide spectacle independence for near or intermediate vision. Multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs), while offering greater spectacle independence, are relatively contraindicated in glaucoma due to increased visual disturbances like glare and halos. Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLs offer an intermediate solution, using advanced optics to provide a continuous range of vision and fewer photic disturbances than MFIOLs. EDOF lenses have demonstrated good uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma, with promising CS outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, findings on CS performance remain inconsistent across studies. Given these considerations, this study seeks to determine whether EDOF IOLs can be a viable alternative to monofocal lenses in glaucoma patients, potentially expanding their options for spectacle independence without compromising visual quality. The trial, conducted at OMIQ (Barcelona), will directly compare an EDOF IOL and a monofocal IOL made from the same material to assess their effects on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and photic phenomena in this specific patient population.

Comparing XEN®-63 Gel Stent and PRESERFLO® MicroShunt

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn whether two minimally invasive bleb-forming glaucoma implants can effectively treat adult patients with open-angle glaucoma who require surgical lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP). Specifically, the study evaluates whether the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt is at least as effective as the XEN®-63 Gel Stent in reducing IOP after surgery.  The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt provide IOP reduction at 12 months that is non-inferior to the XEN®-63 Gel Stent? * How do the two devices compare over 24 months with respect to medication reduction, need for additional glaucoma procedures, complications, and preservation of visual function and ocular structures? Participants will: * Be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the XEN®-63 Gel Stent or the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt during a single glaucoma surgery. * Attend scheduled follow-up visits over 24 months for eye-pressure measurements, vision testing, visual-field testing, OCT imaging, endothelial-cell counts, and safety assessments. * Receive standard postoperative care and report any complications or additional treatments during the study period.

Direct vs. Conventional SLT in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A RCT

This study compares two laser treatments for open-angle glaucoma: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) and Direct Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (DSLT). SLT is a widely used procedure that requires a manual technique with a goniolens, while DSLT is a new, automated, non-contact method using the Eagle system. The study will evaluate whether DSLT is as effective as SLT in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either treatment and will be monitored over 12 months to assess changes in IOP, medication use, and safety outcomes. The goal is to determine if the simpler DSLT procedure can provide similar results to SLT, potentially improving patient comfort and access to glaucoma care.