Clinical Research Directory

Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Premandibula.

Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques are : tunnel technique (T), coronally advanced flap (CAF) or a combination of both (TCAF). Tunnel and coronally advanced flap are frequently used in clinical practice, whereas the combined technique is a rather recent developed surgical approach. This randomized controlled trial compares CAF and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums in the lower front teeth. The main question it aims to answer is: \- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term? This may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier. Researchers will compare the coronally advanced flap (CAF = the gum is detached and repositioned higher) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap/tunnel is to increase thickness and provide support. Participants will: * Undergo surgery (CAF or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions * Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery * Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)

Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Maxilla.

Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques are: tunnel technique (T), coronally advanced flap (CAF) or a combination of both (TCAF). Tunnel and coronally advanced flap are frequently used in clinical practice, whereas the combined technique is a relatively recently developed surgical approach. This randomized controlled trial compares CAF and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums at multiple adjacent teeth in the upper jaw. The main question it aims to answer is: \- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term? This may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier. Researchers will compare the coronally advanced flap (CAF = the gum is detached and repositioned higher) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap/tunnel is to increase thickness and provide support. Participants will: * Undergo surgery (CAF or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions * Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery * Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)

Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible

Multiple techniques can be used for recession coverage. The most common techniques for single recessions are : tunnel technique (T) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both combined with a palatal graft to provide sufficient gingival thickness. Recently two modifications have been described in literature, namely the tunneled coronally advanced flap and the modified tunnel. MTUN will function as the control group while people treated with the TCAF technique will function as the test group. This randomized controlled trial compares MTUN and TCAF to determine which technique provides better root coverage for receding gums at single recession in the premandible. The main question it aims to answer is: \- What is the average root coverage achieved with each technique in the short and long term? This may be clinically relevant because covering gum recession can reduce tooth sensitivity, improve aesthetics and make oral hygiene easier. Researchers will compare the modified tunnel technique (MTUN = the gum is undermined) with the tunneled coronally advanced flap (TCAF = the gum is undermined, only partially detached and repositioned higher). In both techniques, a small piece of tissue is removed from the palate, which is used to cover the recession. The purpose of the connective tissue graft under the flap/tunnel, is to increase thickness and provide support. Pain associated to the material used to cover the donorsite will be seen as the secondary research question. The site will either be covered by spongostan and multiple stitches or a palatal stent. Participants will: * Undergo surgery (MTUN or TCAF, randomly assigned) to cover recessions * Attend regular check-ups for up to 10 years after surgery * Keep a postoperative journal (recording medication use, pain levels, tooth sensitivity, etc.)

Role of Manuka Honey in Lowering Pain and Boosting Healing After Gum Graft Surgery.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if medical grade Manuka Honey works to lower pain and improve healing sites after gum grafting surgery. The main questions are: * Does medical grade Manuka honey lower pain and painkiller use after gum grafting surgery ? * Does medical grade Manuka honey boost healing after gum grafting surgery ? Researchers will compare, within the same patient, the results of a surgery with the application of Manuka honey in a retainer to a surgery without the application of honey in the retainer for the healing period. Participants will: * Visit the clinic for their first surgery. * Fill up a daily survey to explain their level of pain and the amount of painkiller drugs used. * Visit the clinic once every week for 6 weeks for follow-ups. * Visit the clinic for their second surgery, four weeks after the first one. * Fill up a daily survey to explain their level of pain and the amount of painkiller drugs used after the second surgery. * Visit the clinic once every week for 6 weeks for follow-ups on the second surgery * Fill a survey to compare both surgeries . * Visit the clinic 2 months, 6 months and one year after the surgeries for more follow-ups.

Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in CAF + SCTG: the Impact of Compressive Sutures

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the additional effect on clinical outcomes of compressive sutures associated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions (as classified by Cairo et al.). Forty patients presenting with at least one RT1 recession will be enrolled in the study. Twenty participants will undergo CAF + SCTG with compressive sutures while the other 20 participants will receive the same procedure without compressive sutures. The primary outcome, complete root coverage (CRC), will be assessed six months after treatment. Additional clinical parameters, including gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), pocket depth (PD), keratinized tissue width (KT), keratinized tissue thickness (GT), and Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES), will be evaluated at baseline and at the six-month follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will also be measured, including the degree of general discomfort (D) experienced, assessed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, as well as patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction (PRES) and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS), both quantified on a VAS scale from 0 to 10.

Clinical Evaluation of Gingival Biotype Changes Using a Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in Combination with Leucocyte and Platelet- Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Membranes of Different Thickness for the Treatment of RT1 Gingival Recession: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Gingival thickness plays a key role not only in the etiology but also in the treatment of gingival recessions. More recently, authors reported that as the gingival thickness decreases, the gingival recession severity increases . When gingival inflammation occurs, if the tissue is thin the consequent destruction can quickly produce a gingival recession (GR) . When treating a gingival recession, the clinician should aim not only to completely cover the exposed root surface but also to prevent a future recession recurrence. The treatment gold standard is the CAF associated with connective tissue graft. This technique has demonstrated high rates in gingival recession reduction and positive predictability in obtaining complete root coverage. However, some disadvantages about this surgical approach can be easily highlighted: patients experience more discomfort, longer chair-time it's necessary and a second wound area is created. In this scenario, The Platelet rich in fibrin and leucocyte (L-PRF) could be a valuable alternative treatment of gingival defects. It's a platelet concentrate, obtained by a fast and simple procedure that does not require anticoagulant and bovine thrombin. It can also be categorized as a live tissue thanks to platelets, leukocytes, growth factors and stem cells trapped in a polymerized fibrin mesh. L- PRF is used in various fields of regenerative medicine; It promotes stabilization and revascularization of the flaps, contributes to soft tissue wound healing and reduces post-operative discomfort. The purpose of this study will be to evaluate if the different thickness of platelet- rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes in association with a Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF), for the treatment of RT1 gingival recessions, may influence the Complete Root Coverage (CRC).