Clinical Research Directory

Telemedicine-guided Uptitration of Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, no-profit interventional trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a telemedicine-based follow-up strategy compared with standard ambulatory care in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study aims to determine whether telemedicine-guided management improves the optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), measured as change in GDMT score at 6 months. Patients will be randomized to either a telemedicine group, involving remote multiparametric monitoring and structured teleconsultations, or a standard-of-care group based on conventional in-person follow-up. Secondary objectives include the assessment of safety, treatment adherence, quality of life, and heart failure-related urgent visits, emergency department access, and hospitalizations. This study will provide evidence on the role of telemedicine in facilitating early and effective optimization of heart failure therapy and improving clinical management in a real-world setting.

Heart Failure Management for Patient With CIED Remotely Monitored

This randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel, multicenter clinical study evaluates the efficacy of SmartSignalHF compared with heart failure (HF) remote monitoring (RM) standard of care in implanted patients with heart failure. The primary objective is to determine whether SmartSignalHF reduces all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations at 12 months.

Pharmacological Optimization in Prevention in Heart Failure: A Sex-gap?

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a rapid and intensive optimization of heart failure medications in women can improve outcomes after hospitalization for heart failure. It will also investigate the safety and the tolerance of these treatments when given at full guideline-recommended doses. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does intensive medication optimization reduce death or hospital readmissions for heart failure within one year? 2. Do women benefit as much as men from intensive and full-dose heart failure therapy? 3. Is this treatment protocol safe and feasible also in women? Researchers will compare two groups of women hospitalized for heart failure: * High-intensity care: starting and increasing all recommended heart-failure medications as quickly as possible and monitoring patients closely during the first weeks after discharge. * Usual care: medications are started and adjusted gradually, according to the judgment of the treating cardiologist and the patient's usual care team. The study will follow participants for 12 months to see whether the high-intensity strategy reduces death, hospital readmission for heart failure, or worsening symptoms. It will also evaluate side effects, medication tolerance, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups, attend regular follow-up visits for one year, complete a short quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D). This study will include about 360 women from 13 hospitals in Italy. It is sponsored by IRCCS Policlinico San Donato and funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA).

Effectiveness of Video Monitoring and Care Transition for Heart Failure Patients (EVIT-HF): Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to measure the effectiveness of video monitoring associated with the transition of care for patients with heart failure. The main questions it aims to answer is: Is video monitoring superior to monitoring via audio calls in patients with heart failure? Researchers will compare monitoring by video to a monitoring by audio to see if drug videomonitoring works to improve selfcare in heart failure and other outocomes. Participants will: intervention group receive video calls guided by cardiologist nurses at 7, 30, 60, 180 and 365 days after hospital discharge. the control group will receive audio calls for data collection, at the same time mentioned.

AI-Based Monitoring System for Chronic Heart Failure With Advanced Wearable and Mini-Invasive Devices

The goal of this observational, multicenter study is to evaluate whether AI-driven remote monitoring using a mini-invasive wearable device can improve clinical outcomes in adult patients (≥18 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can continuous remote monitoring reduce hospital admissions (emergency visits and hospitalizations) by 20% compared to standard care? * Does wearable-based remote monitoring improve functional, biochemical, and instrumental parameters in CHF patients? Researchers will compare patients using the wearable device (intervention group) to those receiving standard clinical follow-up (control group) to assess whether AI-driven monitoring leads to fewer hospitalizations, better disease management, and improved quality of life. Participants will: * Wear the EmbracePlus (Empatica Inc.) device continuously for six months (intervention group only). * Have their biometric data (SpO₂, HRV, EDA, respiratory rate, temperature, sleep quality) monitored remotely. * Receive automated alerts and teleconsultations if abnormal physiological changes are detected. * Attend scheduled follow-up visits (remote and in-person) for clinical evaluation and treatment adjustments. The study aims to provide real-world evidence on whether integrating wearable health technology with AI analytics can enhance CHF management and improve patient outcomes.

Vericiguat and Reverse Remodeling Indices in Heart Failure

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate how vericiguat benefits adults with stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are already receiving guideline-directed medical therapy. The main questions are: * Does vericiguat improve right ventricular systolic function, measured by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)? * Does vericiguat favourably influence myocardial remodeling, fibrosis, angiogenesis, inflammation, metabolism, renal function, and hematologic balance? * Do genetic and oxidative stress profiles modify treatment response? Researchers will compare a group receiving vericiguat plus usual care with a group receiving usual care alone to assess structural, functional, and biomarker changes over 12 months. Participants will: * Have blood drawn at baseline and follow-up visits for biomarker, metabolomic, genetic, transcriptomic, and hematologic analyses, including platelet function testing * Perform oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) to assess insulin resistance * Undergo echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac scintigraphy to evaluate heart structure, function, and perfusion * Attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months Open-label extension: After the 12-month randomized phase, participants originally assigned to usual care will be offered open-label vericiguat and followed for an additional 12 months. This exploratory extension will reassess study outcomes to evaluate the consistency and magnitude of response to vericiguat in the prior control cohort.

Endovascular Ablation of the Right Greater Splanchnic Nerve in Subjects With Reduced Ejection Fraction

This study is a small, early-stage clinical trial designed to test whether a new catheter-based procedure is safe and may help people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The procedure uses the Satera Ablation System to treat the right greater splanchnic nerve, which may play a role in heart failure symptoms. The study also aims to identify which types of patients might benefit most from this treatment in the future. Up to 50 patients aged 40 or older with HFrEF will take part at as many as 10 hospitals worldwide. The study is prospective, meaning patients are followed forward in time, and it is randomized, double-blinded, and sham-controlled. Patients are randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either receive the actual nerve ablation treatment or a sham (placebo) procedure. Randomization happens during the procedure, after anesthesia or sedation, to reduce the risk of revealing which treatment the patient receives. Neither the patient nor their heart failure doctor will know whether the patient received the real treatment or the sham. However, the doctor performing the procedure and certain study staff will know, mainly for safety and operational reasons. The sham procedure is designed to mimic the real procedure as closely as possible without performing the nerve ablation. It involves placing a small needle in the groin or neck and accessing the vein, but no treatment catheter is inserted. The sham procedure takes about the same amount of time as the real treatment (around 45 minutes) to help account for any placebo effect. Overall, this study is focused on evaluating safety and early signs of benefit rather than proving long-term effectiveness.

Precision Subtyping and Prognostic Study of Heart Failure Based on Multi-Omics Integration and Clinical Indicators: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study

This is a prospective single-center cohort study conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, aiming to enroll 400 patients with chronic heart failure (including HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF) and 200 healthy controls.We will collect clinical data (e.g., NYHA class, NT-proBNP), multi-omics samples (genome, proteome, metabolome, gut microbiome), and imaging indicators (e.g., EAT density, myocardial strain) from participants at baseline. For patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors, we will also track dynamic changes in multi-omics during follow-up.The main purpose is to build a composite risk prediction model (integrating multi-omics and clinical indicators) to predict the 1-year composite endpoint (heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause death). Secondary goals include identifying specific molecular profiles related to heart failure phenotypes, exploring the "gut-heart axis" mechanism, and finding early biomarkers for SGLT2 inhibitor response.All participants will be followed up for at least 12 months, and the study will strictly comply with ethical norms and protect the privacy of participants.

Clinical Evaluation of the AccuCinch® Ventricular Restoration System in Patients Who Present With Symptomatic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): The CORCINCH-HF Study

Prospective, randomized, open-label, international, multi-center clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the AccuCinch Ventricular Restoration System in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Single and Twice-daily Dosing of Ramipril on Renal Function in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure

This study compares the effects of once-daily versus twice-daily ramipril dosing on renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Outcomes include changes in plasma renin activity, malondialdehyde, interleukin-6, albuminuria, and cystatin C after 30 days of therapy.

Correlation of Typical LBBB Mechanical Activation Pattern by 2D Strain Echocardiography With Acute GWE Improvement in Patients Receiving LBBp or Conventional BiVp for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (Echo LBBp)

The present study is a multicenter interventional non randomised study in patients requiring an implantable device for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Its primary objective is to investigate whether the presence of a specific echocardiographic contraction pattern before implantation is associated with increased rates of acute improvement in myocardial function (as measured by an ultrasound) and to compare the improvement in two groups of patients based on the type of pacing (biventricular or left-sided pacing)

Comparative Effectiveness of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Succinate in Heart Failure Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized comparative effectiveness trial, titled CARVTOP-ICD, evaluates the impact of carvedilol versus metoprolol succinate in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The study will enroll 2,000 participants across 100 U.S. sites and includes an 18-month feasibility phase with 100 participants from 15 sites. Eligible participants must be currently treated with metoprolol succinate and willing to switch to carvedilol, with randomization in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be followed for up to 3 years, with regular assessments including ICD interrogations, medication adherence, healthcare utilization, and quality of life surveys. The primary endpoint is the first occurrence of any ICD therapy (appropriate or inappropriate), cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization, or CV death. Secondary endpoints include ICD shock burden, healthcare utilization, and patient-reported quality of life. The trial aims to provide high-quality comparative data to address clinical equipoise surrounding the two commonly used beta-blockers in HFrEF management.

Flow Regulation by Opening the SepTum in Patients With Heart Failure; a Prospective, Randomized, Sham-controlled, Double-blind, Global Multicenter Study

The purpose of this clinical study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Atrial Flow Regulator in the treatment of subjects, 18 years of age or older, who have symptomatic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) while on stable guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) as outlined in the Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure.

IRONICA: IRON Repletion In Heart Failure - A Comparison of Oral and IV Approaches

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which iron treatment works better for adults with congestive heart failure and low iron levels: intravenous (IV) iron given through a vein or oral (PO) iron taken by mouth. Participants must have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a transferrin-saturation (TSAT) level below 20 percent. The main questions the study will answer are: 1. Does IV iron raise walking distance on a 6-minute walk test more than oral iron after 24 weeks? 2. Does IV iron improve symptoms and quality of life more than oral iron? 3. How do the two treatments compare for safety, side effects, and hospital readmissions/ mortality? Researchers will compare IV ferric carboxymaltose with oral ferrous sulfate to see which option helps people feel and function better. What participants will do * Be randomly assigned by (like flipping a coin) to IV iron or oral iron. * Receive either a one-time IV iron infusion (with possible repeat at 12 weeks) or take iron pills twice each day for 24 weeks. * Visit the infusion clinic at 6 weeks for second dose of IV iron if needed. * Visit the clinic at 12 weeks for a follow-up to gather follow-up data including 1. A 6-minute walk test 2. Brief symptom and quality-of-life surveys 3. Blood tests to measure serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation This study will help doctors decide whether IV or oral iron is the safer, more effective way to treat iron deficiency in people with heart failure in our local community.

Evaluating Dashboard-Integrated Pharmacist-Led Education on Improving Sacubitril/Valsartan Adherence in Heart Failure (PharmD ASSIST HFrEF)

The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to evaluate whether pharmacist-led education, integrated with interactive visualization dashboards, can enhance medication adherence in patients with heart failure who are prescribed sacubitril/valsartan. The main question it aims to answer is: Can pharmacist-led interactive visualization dashboards improve adherence to sacubitril/valsartan compared to usual care without the dashboard intervention? Researchers will compare patients receiving pharmacist-led education with interactive dashboards to those receiving standard education, assessing differences in medication adherence and clinical outcomes, among others. Participants will: * Complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires on medication adherence and satisfaction with pharmacist-provided services, and others. * Engage in education sessions led by pharmacists, with or without dashboard integration. The study outcomes will include medication adherence, and secondary outcomes such as patient satisfaction with pharmacist-provided services, optimized guideline-directed medical therapy score, time to high medication adherence, the calculated proportion of days covered, New York Heart Association functional classification, and the net promoter score used for evaluating recommendation and satisfaction with the dashboard intervention.

Metoprolol in Patients With HFrEF and COPD

The goal of the clinical trial was to see if Metoprolol was effective in treating patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It will also learn about the safety of Metoprolol. The main questions it aims to answer are: Did Metoprolol reduce the frequency of all-cause deaths and re-hospitalizations in subjects? What medical problems do participants experience after taking Metoprolol? The researchers will compare different doses of Metoprolol to see the best dose for Metoprolol. Participants will: Take Metoprolol 23.75mg/ day or the maximum tolerable dose of Metoprolol daily for 24 months. Regular outpatient follow-up visits to the research center. Their symptoms and Metoprolol dosage were recorded.