Clinical Research Directory

Socket Shield Technique With CGF and Xenograft for Immediate Implants

This prospective case series aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate implant placement using the socket shield technique combined with concentrated growth factors (CGF) and xenograft in the esthetic zone. The study will assess crestal bone level changes and implant stability over a 6-month follow-up period.

Immediate Implant Placement Using Socket Shield With CGF

This prospective case series study aims to clinically and radiographically evaluate the effectiveness of the socket shield technique combined with concentrated growth factors (CGF) in immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. Outcomes will include crestal bone level changes assessed by CBCT and implant stability measured using Osstell.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of CGF and Alloplastic Grafting in Participants Undergoing the Socket Shield Technique for Immediate Anterior Maxillary Implant Placement. This Study Assesses Bone Healing and Stability When Managing the Crestal Gap in the Esthetic Zone.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of the socket shield technique combined with concentrated growth factor (CGF) and alloplastic graft in promoting bone healing and achieving successful immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. This prospective case series involves both male and female participants aged 18 years or older who require immediate implant placement in the maxillary anterior segments. The main questions it aims to answer are : Does the combined use of CGF and alloplastic grafting materials with the socket shield technique improve crestal bone levels as measured by CBCT? How does this intervention affect secondary outcomes such as primary implant stability measured via the Osstell implant stability quotient? Participants will: Undergo a socket shield procedure (partial extraction therapy) where the labial root fragment is retained to preserve the buccal bone. Provide a blood sample for the preparation of autologous CGF. Receive simultaneous immediate implant placement. Have a "sticky bone" mixture of CGF and alloplastic graft packed into the jumping gap around the implant. Attend follow-up appointments for clinical assessments and CBCT imaging at 2 weeks and 6 months post-operatively.

Supracrestal Socket Sheild

Post-extraction labio-palatal ridge collapse is a significant challenge in restorative and implant dentistry particularly in anterior maxilla. Following tooth extraction, marked dimensional alveolar ridge changes occur. The buccal plate of bone in the anterior zone is primarily composed of bundle bone, a tooth dependent structure that derives its blood supply from the periodontal ligament (PDL). The PDL loss after tooth extraction results in rapid resorption of the bundle bone, leading to horizontal and vertical ridge reduction (Araújo and Lindhe, 2005, Schropp et al., 2003). Studies have shown that 50% of ridge width reduction occurs within 12 months, with two thirds of this reduction occurring within the first 3 months (Schropp et al., 2003). Moreover, the labial plate thickness in the anterior maxilla is frequently thinner than 1 mm in the majority of cases (Huynh-Ba et al., 2010). The high incidence of mid-facial recession and soft tissue volume loss is attributed to those biological events. Although IIP has become increasingly popular due to its short treatment time, it doesn't prevent physiological remodeling associated with bundle bone resorption (Araújo and Lindhe, 2005). Consequently, soft tissue collapse and midfacial recession remain common complications, especially in thin periodontal phenotypes (Chappuis et al., 2013, Cosyn et al., 2012). In order to overcome the inevitable consequences of tooth extraction, a variety of ridge preservation techniques were proposed in the literature including; flapless implant placement, bone grafting, soft tissue augmentation procedures, immediate provisionalization, a more palatal orientation of the implant in the socket and the socket shield technique.

Immediate Implant Placement and Immediate Restoration With Prefabricated Provisionals

* Background * There is a growing tendency to place a provisional restoration immediately following implant placement. Clinical advantages are shortening of treatment duration and soft tissue guiding during healing resulting in better esthetic outcomes. Provisional restorations can be made either chair-side or in the dental laboratory after implant placement. Nowadays, digital planning makes it possible to fabricate the provisional restoration before implant surgery. The advantage of this technique is that the treatment procedure of placement of the provisional restoration immediately after implant placement is much less time consuming for the patient and due to its machined polished character possibly beneficial for soft tissues. * Main research question The aim of this retrospective case series study, with full digital workflow, is to evaluate single tooth implant treatment after immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic region, with respect to registration of possible complications during the time of placement and evaluation of the prefabricated provisional registration and evaluation of clinical and radiographical performance and aesthetic outcome with the definitive restoration after at least 1 year in function. * Design (including population, confounders/outcomes) The study design is a retrospective, single-arm observational study for evaluation of 50 patients with a failing tooth in the maxillary aesthetic region, which were treated with an implant-supported provisional and definitive restoration by means of a digital workflow. Outcomes: registration of possible complications during the time of placement and evaluation of the provisional registration and evaluation of clinical and radiographical performance and aesthetic outcome with the definitive restoration. * Expected results Satisfying results for patients and professionals (VAS-scores and PES/WES-scores).

Immediate Implants in Front Teeth With Bone Loss: Regeneration and Temporary Crown in a Randomized Clinical Study

This clinical trial investigates the biological and clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement in aesthetic areas presenting with buccal bone dehiscence. Traditionally, these defects are treated with a bone graft and covered using a collagen membrane; however, there is ongoing debate about whether the membrane is necessary for optimal regeneration. This study proposes the use of a connective tissue graft instead of a collagen membrane, aiming to improve soft tissue volume and aesthetics without compromising bone healing. The objective of the study is to evaluate whether the use of an autogenous connective tissue graft in combination with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral with collagen (DBBM-C) achieves results that are not inferior to the conventional protocol that uses DBBM-C and a collagen membrane. The main outcome variable is the vertical buccal bone gain measured after twelve months of healing. The study design is a randomized controlled clinical trial including twenty-four patients divided equally into two groups. Each participant will attend eight follow-up visits over twelve months. After atraumatic tooth extraction, immediate implants (BLC, Straumann) will be placed using a prosthetically guided protocol. Buccal dehiscence will be measured intraoperatively, and a partial-thickness tunnel flap will be prepared to allow soft tissue adaptation and graft placement. In the control group, the defect will be filled with DBBM-C and covered with a collagen membrane stabilized with horizontal mattress sutures. In the test group, the defect will receive DBBM-C covered by a connective tissue graft harvested from the palate and fixed in a similar manner. When primary stability is equal to or greater than 35 N/cm, an immediate screw-retained provisional crown will be delivered; if stability is lower, a customized healing abutment or Maryland-type provisional will be used instead. After three months, digital impressions will be taken to fabricate the definitive zirconia restoration. All restorative steps will be performed by experienced clinicians using a standardized digital workflow. Patients will follow routine postoperative care instructions, including soft diet and restricted brushing in the surgical area for one week. The main benefits of this study include advancing the understanding of regeneration strategies for buccal bone dehiscence and improving clinical decision-making in immediate implant protocols. Participants are also expected to benefit from implant-supported rehabilitation, functional restoration, and aesthetic improvement. The potential risks are minimal and limited to typical surgical complications such as discomfort, swelling, or minor infection, which will be managed following established clinical protocols. If a patient declines participation, conventional implant treatment will be offered, or alternative prosthetic options such as fixed or removable restorations will be provided. Any intra- or postoperative complications during the study will be treated promptly and documented according to institutional standards. The biomaterials used include BLC Straumann implants, Bio-Oss Collagen (DBBM-C), Bio-Gide collagen membranes, and appropriate suture materials. Procedures will employ standard periodontal and tunneling instruments, as well as a digital intraoral scanner for accurate prosthetic fabrication. Statistical analysis will involve descriptive and inferential methods. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will assess normality, and mixed ANOVA models will evaluate differences between groups and across time points. Covariate adjustment will be performed using ANCOVA when necessary, and intra- and inter-examiner reliability will be tested with the intraclass correlation coefficient. The level of statistical significance will be set at 0.05. The expected outcome is that the use of an autogenous connective tissue graft will demonstrate bone regeneration results equivalent to those obtained with a collagen membrane, while potentially improving soft tissue thickness and aesthetic integration. This finding would support the clinical use of soft tissue grafts as an alternative to collagen membranes in immediate implant placement within aesthetic regions showing buccal dehiscence. All study procedures follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical standards for human clinical research. Participants will receive detailed information about the study protocol and will sign informed consent before inclusion. In summary, this study aims to determine whether a connective tissue graft can safely replace a collagen membrane in the management of buccal dehiscence during immediate implant placement, offering comparable regenerative outcomes with possible superior soft tissue aesthetics.

Thymoquinone Around Immediate Implant

use of Thymoquinone hydrogel with bone graft in comparison to bone graft only around immediate implant-this hydrogel fill the jumping zone in comparison to using hydrogel bone graft only to increase primary stability and enhance osseointegration

Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla

The present study aims to compare the dimensional stability of the supra-implant complex following flapless immediate implant placement using two socket management approaches: the connective tissue graft and the socket shield technique. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be employed to assess and quantify changes in soft and hard tissue thickness and height surrounding the implant site.

Vestibular Versus Trapezoid Flap in Immediate Implants

The vestibular socket therapy was introduced by Elaskary et al that allowed immediate implant placement and total socket rehabilitation at the same time in class 2 compromised sockets , that showed supreme esthetic and functional predictability over 1,2,3 years of follow up, and showed minimal or no post restorative mid facial recession . The Vestibular socket therapy (VST) entails socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision to allow the delivery of the grafting components thus bypass the deleterious effect of the classic mucoperiosteal flap reflection as well as the deleterious effect of the delay approach, regardless of the degree of socket compromise \[6-8\].

Osseodensification vs Conventional Drilling for Immediate Dental Implant Placement

Aim of the study is to analyze and compare the characteristic differences occurring in the surrounding bone in an immediate implant placed by osseodensification to immediate implants placed with the conventional technique