Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Efficacy of Early Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

This is a two-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of early left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure with mild-reduced ejection fraction.

Safety and Performances of the LINEA Cardiac Pacing Lead Optimized for the Implantation in Interventricular Septum

The purpose of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and performances of the new LINEA cardiac pacing lead, intended for placement at the interventricular septum.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy After Myectomy

Pilot interventional randomized clinical trial to study the efficacy of left bundle branch pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after myectomy for the prevention of progression of heart failure, prevent the occurrence of life-threatening rhythm disturbances and promote reverse remodeling of the LV. The aim of the study is to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator with left bundle branch block pacing and a dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with HCM and complete left bundle branch block after myectomy at high risk of SCD. Objectives of the study: 1. To analyze the safety of ICD implantation procedures with LBBB pacing in patients with HCM and LBBB after myectomy at high risk of SCD; 2. To develop a technique for LBBB lead implantation in patients with HCM and LBBB after myectomy; 3. To conduct a comparative analysis of QRS complex duration data based on ECG data before and after surgery, LV activation time, and pacing threshold based on postoperative programming data; 4. To conduct a comparative analysis of the functional class of CHF, NT-proBNP, the presence/absence of interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, the degree of diastolic dysfunction, LVEF, and LV EDV based on echocardiography data before and 12 months after surgery; 5. Conduct a comparative analysis of QRS complex duration data based on ECG data, LV activation time, pacing threshold, the presence of recorded episodes of AF, VT, VF, antitachycardia and shock therapy according to programming data at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; 6. Assess quality of life before and 12 months after surgery using the KCCQ-12 questionnaire; 30 patients (15 patients in each group) will be randomly separated into 2 groups. All participants go through ICD programming at 3, 6, and 12 months after myectomy, assessment of left ventricular remodeling based on ECG and echocardiography, NT-proBNP, assessment of quality of life before surgery and 12 months after surgery.

Study of AHRE Burden in Patients Undergoing Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing.

This prospective observational study evaluates the burden of Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHRE) in patients without a prior history of atrial fibrillation who undergo concurrent Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing (BBAP) and Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP). Physiological pacing at these sites aims to improve interatrial conduction and reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias. The study includes a comparative assessment across three patient groups: 1. BBAP + LBBP (physiological pacing group) 2. Right Atrial Appendage (RAA) pacing + LBBP 3. Conventional pacing - RAA and Right Ventricular (RV) pacing AHRE burden will be quantified via device diagnostics and remote monitoring at 3, 12 and 24 months post-implantation. Episodes will be classified by duration (0-6 min, 6-24 h, \>24 h), differentiating subclinical AHRE from clinically documented AF. Secondary analyses include electrocardiographic changes (P-wave indices), the need for antiarrhythmic therapy, and comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation of atrial function (e.g., LA strain, conduction delays, LAVI). The study aims to determine whether physiological pacing (BBAP + LBBP) provides superior protection against AHRE development compared with RAA + LBBP and conventional pacing strategies.

REDO-AF: Randomized Evaluation of Dual Options for AF Re-intervention

The goal of this randomized open-label clinical trial is to evaluate two different strategies for the treatment of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF ablation. Patients who have symptomatic, drug-refractory recurrence of AF will be randomized to either a redo AF ablation vs conduction system pacing with AV node ablation. Patients will need to have undergone at least 1 prior AF ablation to be considered eligible for the study. The current trial is a vanguard study of 16 patients and will determine the feasibility of enrolment, compare changes in quality of life, and inform the design of the definitive REDO AF trial.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing 3D Guidance System

The investigator's project proposes the development of a 3D hybrid guidance system which has the aim of avoidance of scar and septal perforation through targeted lead deployment via a personalised septal real time image overlay onto x-ray fluoroscopy imaging during left bundle branch pacing. The investigators hypothesise that the use of cardiac anatomy and myocardial scar distribution derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as 3D position of the pacing lead, may improve LBBAP lead deployment success and improve clinical outcomes by guiding the physician towards optimal lead positioning.