Clinical Research Directory
Browse clinical research sites, groups, and studies.
7 clinical studies listed.
Filters:
Tundra lists 7 Motor Impairment clinical trials. Each listing includes eligibility criteria, study locations, and direct links to research sites in the Tundra directory.
This data is also available as a public JSON API. AI systems and LLMs are encouraged to use it for structured queries.
NCT07439367
Multifocal Theta-Burst Stimulation to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke (INSPIRE)
Stroke is one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Many individuals who survive a stroke continue to experience weakness and reduced control of one arm, even months or years after the event. These motor impairments significantly affect independence, daily activities, and quality of life. Despite rehabilitation efforts, recovery of upper limb function remains incomplete for many patients. Motor recovery after stroke depends on the brain's ability to reorganize itself, a process known as neuroplasticity. Recent research suggests that motor learning and brain recovery are influenced not only by activity in the primary motor cortex (M1), but also by its functional connectivity with other brain regions, particularly the parietal cortex (PC). Strengthening communication between these regions may enhance motor recovery. This study aims to investigate a novel, non-invasive brain stimulation approach called intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS). Unlike traditional stimulation methods that target a single brain region, this study uses a multifocal stimulation protocol targeting both the primary motor cortex and the parietal cortex. The stimulation is combined with structured motor training using an interactive tablet-based rehabilitation device (REAtouch®Lite 2), designed to improve arm movement through goal-directed reaching tasks. The study is a single-center, randomized, sham-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial with parallel groups. Thirty-six individuals with chronic stroke-related upper limb impairment will be randomly assigned to receive either active multifocal iTBS or sham (placebo) stimulation. Both groups will complete identical motor training sessions. In addition, ten healthy participants will complete the same motor training protocol (without brain stimulation) to provide reference data. Participants will attend six visits over approximately 10 days. Assessments will include motor performance tests using the interactive tablet, a standardized clinical motor scale (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity), and resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain connectivity changes. The primary outcome is improvement in motor performance between baseline and one week after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include short-term motor improvements, retention of learning, changes in movement quality, and changes in brain functional connectivity. This study seeks to determine whether combining multifocal brain stimulation with targeted motor training can enhance motor learning and promote better recovery of arm function after stroke. If effective, this approach could contribute to the development of more precise, network-based neurorehabilitation strategies.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-27
1 state
NCT07429188
Impact Study on Users of Upper Limb Assistive Devices
This impact study of upper limb (UL) assistance devices is part of the Exploratory PEPR O2R "Robotic assistance for human movements." The integrated project PI3 "ASSISTMOV," composed of a multidisciplinary team in engineering and Human and Social Sciences (HSS), targets the use case of employing robotic assistance for the movement of persons with disabilities (PWD). Through the development of a range of exoskeletons (lower and upper limbs), this project aims for a breakthrough technology enabling fluid and robust interaction with a variety of environments and uses (from rehabilitation to daily life). The proposed study contributes to this objective by exploring the clinical and psychosocial dimensions of the daily use of UL assistance devices. Through interviews and questionnaires, it aims to collect data on their impact in terms of independence in activities of daily living (ADL), satisfaction, quality of life, social participation, as well as social perceptions related to the use of these technical aids. It will make it possible to document the benefits and limitations of existing devices from the users' point of view (patients and informal and/or professional caregivers), by identifying the factors that facilitate or hinder their adoption and by exploring the care pathway, from prescription to daily use. The questionnaires will also allow examination of economic dimensions. The participants included in this study will be recruited among users already using, in their daily life, an UL movement assistance device. All will be regular users of their device, functionally integrated into their usual environment for at least two months. Only devices benefiting from CE marking, guaranteeing their compliance with European regulations, will be eligible. No equipment will be specifically provided within the framework of this research: each participant will share their experience with their own device, as it is integrated into their ADL. A preliminary literature review helped identify the main categories of UL movement assistance devices, grouped according to the following typologies: grasping gloves, mealtime aids, robotic manipulation arms, and arm supports (electric or mechanical). The purpose of the approach is both diagnostic and forward-looking. It is diagnostic in that it makes it possible to analyze current practices, real activity, and users' viewpoints, in order to identify elements likely to be improved in the recommendation and use of the devices. It is also forward-looking, since it aims to identify new opportunities, needs, or potential developments, in order to support the thinking of roboticists based on field observations.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - Any
Updated: 2026-02-24
NCT07268079
Validation of the VIRADIA App for Neurological and Cognitive Diagnostics in Virtual Reality
The VIRADIA study aims to validate and assess the reliability of a newly developed Virtual Reality (VR) diagnostic platform designed for neurological and cognitive testing. The goal is to determine whether the VR versions of nine commonly used clinical tests measure the same constructs and provide comparable results to their traditional face-to-face or paper-based forms. The study includes two groups of participants: (1) healthy volunteers and (2) patients with neurological diagnoses. Each participant will complete both the standard and the VR versions of the tests, with the order of administration randomly assigned. The tested functions cover fine motor skills, gait and balance, attention, executive function, processing speed, and visuospatial abilities. The following tests are included in the VR platform: 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), 6 Meter Walk Test, Timed Up and Go - Manual (TUG-M), Functional Reach Test (FRT), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Trail Making Test (TMT A/B), Stroop Test, and SATURN Test. Participants will first provide informed consent and basic demographic information. They will then complete all tests in both modalities (standard and VR), with appropriate breaks between tasks. The study is observational, within-subjects, and paired in design. Primary outcomes include correlation and agreement between VR and standard test scores (validity). Data will be analyzed using paired statistical methods, including Pearson/Spearman correlations, Bland-Altman analysis, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). No medication or invasive intervention is used in this study. The VR testing is non-invasive and carries minimal risk. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Nitra Self-Governing Region (Approval No. 09I05-03-804). The results will provide evidence for the validity and reliability of VR-based diagnostics and support the use of the VIRADIA platform as a safe, standardized tool for neurological and cognitive assessment.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 80 Years
Updated: 2025-12-05
1 state
NCT07010536
Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Music Therapy on Cognitive and Motor Skills in Subacute Stroke Patients
This clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of immersive virtual reality-based music therapy on cognitive and motor functions in individuals aged 50 to 75 years with subacute stroke (between 2 weeks and 6 months post-stroke). Participants will be randomly assigned to either a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy or an experimental group receiving conventional physiotherapy plus virtual reality-based music therapy. The study will assess cognitive performance, upper extremity motor skills, stroke impact, balance, and spatial neglect before and after a 6-week intervention. All participants will be treated at Istanbul Aydın University VM Medical Park Hospital. The study has been approved by the ethics committee, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Gender: All
Ages: 50 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2025-06-08
1 state
NCT06939660
BCI-Assisted SCS-EXS for Gait Optimization
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and technical feasibility of a novel brain-machine interface (BCI)-assisted spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and exoskeleton (EXS) system in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The primary aim is to determine whether the BCI-SCS-EXS system can safely and effectively improve lower limb motor function and quality of life in individuals with chronic SCI. Participant Population: Adults aged 14-65 years (sex/gender not limited). Patients with chronic SCI (≥6 months post-injury) classified as ASIA A, B, or C. Individuals with stable health status, MMSE ≥22, and secondary education or above. Primary Questions: 1. Is the BCI-SCS-EXS system safe and technically feasible for SCI rehabilitation? 2. Does the system improve lower limb motor function and quality of life in SCI patients? Interventions: Participants will undergo the following procedures: Phase I (Implantation): BCI implantation: ECoG electrodes placed over the motor cortex to decode lower limb movement intent. SCS electrode implantation: 5-6-5 paddle electrodes at T11-L2 for targeted spinal cord stimulation. Phase II (System Calibration): BCI-SCS synchronization: Calibration of decoded motor intent to trigger SCS parameters. SCS-EXO synchronization: Integration of SCS pulses with exoskeleton-assisted gait training. Phase III (Rehabilitation): Daily BCI-SCS-EXS training sessions (60 minutes, 5 times/week for 1 year). Adaptive adjustments to stimulation parameters and exoskeleton support based on performance. Remote monitoring of device performance and emergency intervention for technical issues. Outcome Measures: Primary: Safety (adverse events, device performance, synchronization metrics). Secondary: Efficacy (motor function, neurophysiological function, quality of life). Ethics and Safety: Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Adverse events will be monitored and reported according to CTCAE 5.0 guidelines. Participant confidentiality will be strictly maintained. This study will provide foundational evidence for the safety and feasibility of the BCI-SCS-EXO system, paving the way for future randomized controlled trials in SCI rehabilitation.
Gender: All
Ages: 14 Years - 65 Years
Updated: 2025-05-20
1 state
NCT06895005
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Stroke
This study will evaluate the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in combination with physical rehabilitation on upper limb motor function of patients with stroke.
Gender: All
Ages: 18 Years - 75 Years
Updated: 2025-03-30
1 state
NCT06857539
Assessing Intellectual and Motor Outcomes in High-risk Infants
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a condition when a baby has a brain injury that affects their movement and muscle tone. Some people with CP can have other developmental issues, like learning impairments, but many do not and have isolated issues with their motor skills. Some newborns are at higher risk of developing CP, including babies born prematurely, those who have an injury to their brain, and those who have an abnormal neurological examination. However, most babies with a higher risk of CP do not develop CP. The problem is that doctors can't tell early on who will and who will not develop CP, they can only say who has a risk of it. Therefore, these babies are followed up in out-patient clinics to see how they are progressing, usually by a neonatologist (baby doctor), often a physiotherapist, and some may also be referred to services in the community like the Early Intervention Team. If there is a significant concern, doctors will often perform a scan of the baby's brain to provide more information. Even with all this follow-up, it still usually takes at least 12 months, and can be up to 2 years, to diagnose a child as having CP. In this study the aim is to try and reduce the age of diagnosis of CP by assessing children in high-risk out-patient clinics using novel and specific examinations. This study is being conducted at several hospitals in Ireland, including Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), The Rotunda Hospital and the Coombe Women and Infants Hospital. It is being coordinated by the In4kids network and will be conducted in the INFANT Centre/ University College Cork (UCC). The study has been funded by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and the Cerebral Palsy Foundation, USA.
Gender: All
Ages: 0 Days - 4 Months
Updated: 2025-03-04