Clinical Research Directory

Piezoeletric Surgery vs Conventional Surgery for Treatment of MRONJ

To date, surgical therapy of MRONJ remains the therapy of choice while still in association with a medical approach. Surgical intervention aims to stop the progression of the pathology through the removal of the tissue macroscopically affected (resective surgery,sequestrectomy, debridement). These surgical procedures are classically performed by the use of handpiece burs, but due to the advent of piezoelectric surgery in dentistry, a comparison of the two techniques is required At present there are no randomized clinical trials designed to compare the postoperative discomfort of the two previously described techniques in the treatment of MRONJ. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative discomfort in a group of patients undergoing surgical therapy for MRONJ with piezoelectric instruments compared to a control group undergoing MRONJ surgical therapy with traditional rotary instruments. METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial conducted in patients diagnosed with MRONJ who require surgical therapy. Patients will be recruited and evaluated for a period of 24 months. Follow-up of patients enrolled in the study will last 12 months. Specifically, once patients diagnosed with MRONJ requiring surgical therapy are identified, surgery will be scheduled within 1 month, then follow-up visits will be conducted at 1, 2, 3 weeks and 3, 6, 12 months after surgery. Patients enrolled and randomized into one of the two groups will all undergo necrotic bone removal surgery by the same operator with decades of experience in treating MRONJs. Marginal bone resection surgery will be performed using rotary or piezoelectric instruments. Both surgical procedures involve wound closure by first intention healing using sutures. Each bone block removed will undergo histologic examination for diagnostic confirmation of osteonecrosis. Postoperative instructions will be explained to patients, and sutures will be removed at 7 or 14 days after surgery. Each patient will be asked for a 3D radiologic exam (CT or CBCT) at least 12 months after surgery in order to asses the

Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) in a Cohort of Patients Treated by Antiresorptive Drugs

The objective of this prospective observational study is to investigate the incidence of Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ) in patients receiving antiresorptive drugs for oncohematologic reasons during a 5-year follow-up. Secondary objectives are to compare the different antiresorptive drugs in relation to the incidence of MRONJ and to identify any systemic as well as local risk factors.

Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Surgical Treatment of Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but serious side-effect of antiresorptive therapies used in the management of bone diseases, such as osteoporosis or bone metastases. A surgical management can lead to a resolution of the disease, but with perfectible results. For this purpose, the use of autologous platelet concentrates (APC) can be useful. With this study, researchers aim to demonstrate the efficacy of L-PRF (Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin) as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of MRONJ in terms of wound healing.

Local and Systemic Changes in Osteonecrosis of the Jawbone

Osteonecrosis of the Jawbone (ONJ) is a serious complication of antiresorptive therapies (ARTs), for example with bisphosphonates or Denosumab. Especially long term treatment with intravenous antiresorptive agents causing lesions and, less frequent, also oral administration. This study aims at elucidating local and systemic changes in patients with ONJ.