Clinical Research Directory

Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Cardiac RF Ablation

The aim of this study is to describe the results of cardiac radiofrequency ablation under general anesthesia. to evaluate mechanical ventilation methods in pediatric patients. The main questions it aims to answer are 1. Whether lower tidal volume high frequency mechanical ventilation effects the success of radiofrequency ablation in pediatric cardiac arryhtmia patient? 2. The effect of mechanical ventilation strategies on the number of effective lesions, radiofrequency ablation time and arrhythmia recurrence in the first month

Electroporation vs. Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by 3D Imaging in Repeat Procedures for Atrial Fibrillation

This is a prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of two techniques for repeat catheter ablation in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF): thermal energy ablation (radiofrequency) and non-thermal electroporation (pulsed field ablation), both guided by 3D imaging systems. Patients undergoing repeat AF ablation will be randomly assigned to receive either thermal or electroporation ablation, performed according to standard hospital protocols. No additional invasive procedures are required. Following the ablation, participants will attend follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months, including medical history review, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Unscheduled ECG assessments will also be available if arrhythmia symptoms occur. All study-related procedures are non-invasive and align with routine post-ablation care. Risks are limited to those typically associated with standard AF ablation procedures. The main benefit of participation is close, structured follow-up by experienced electrophysiologists, allowing for early detection of arrhythmia recurrence and timely medical intervention when necessary. Participant confidentiality and data protection will be ensured in accordance with GDPR regulations.

Randomized Controlled Trial- Ablation Strategy for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - Trigger and Substrate Guided Wide Area Radiofrequency Ablation Compared to Pulsed Field Ablation Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a heart rhythm disturbance that affects over a million people in North America. AF can cause strokes, heart failure, poor quality of life and may lead to premature death. Catheter ablation has been shown to be superior to medications for symptoms, prevention of stroke and heart failure. AF recurrence is a problem after catheter ablation. Our research has found that in most cases AF recurrence occurs because the catheter procedure was ineffective. The objective of our clinical trial is to find out if a new method of performing the catheter procedure will be more effective in preventing AF recurrence compared to the current standard of care ablation procedure. Subjects will be randomly allocated to undergo either the standard of care ablation, or the novel patient tailored ablation. The novel method aims to understand the unique factors responsible for AF in each individual and uses this information to perform a patient-tailored catheter ablation procedure. This is expected to improve the results of AF ablation. The effectiveness and safety of the ablation procedure will be specifically evaluated in women to understand the effect of sex on AF ablation.

Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation and radiofrequency ablation to treat persistent atrial fibrillation in adults. Participants will: Undergo pulsed field ablation or radiofrequency ablation. Keep follow-up for at least 12 months.