Clinical Research Directory

Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for TAVR

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become widely recognized as a minimally invasive approach for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis. It has been proven to be a safe and effective option for patients who are at low, intermediate, and prohibitive risk for surgical valve replacement. One of the critical components of procedural success in a transfemoral approach is access site management, as vascular complications strongly correlate with adverse outcomes. When major vascular complications occur, there are higher rates of major bleeding, transfusions, and renal failure requiring dialysis, as well as a significantly higher rate of 30-day and 1-year mortality. In recent years, a "preclosure" technique has emerged as a common vascular closure approach using a Perclose Proglide system (Abbott Vascular), in which sutures are deployed before dilating the arterial access site. This allows for arterial closure after dilation to sizing up to larger bore access sheaths that accommodate valve delivery systems. The sutures are subsequently harvested and tightened to close the large bore arteriotomy site at the end of the case. It has been demonstrated that the use of two Perclose devices, or double Perclose closure, is an effective closure technique with a low rate of vascular complications. A large number of TAVR centers have adopted this method for large-bore vascular closure. In the past, there have been few investigations comparing the utilization of a single Perclose device compared to a double Perclose technique. There are numerous theoretical advantages to the use of a single device, which include decreased procedural cost and procedural time. The investigation aimed to determine if there are clinical benefits as well using the single Perclose approach.

Coronary Access After Evolut FX Plus TAVI: Impact of Commissural Alignment and the Large-Cell Frame Design: ACCESS-FX+ Registry

The ACCESS-FX+ Registry is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study designed to evaluate the feasibility of coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Evolut FX Plus transcatheter heart valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis. TAVI has become an established treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis across a broad range of surgical risk profiles. As TAVI is increasingly performed in younger patients with longer life expectancy, maintaining access to the coronary arteries after transcatheter heart valve implantation has become an important clinical consideration. A substantial proportion of patients undergoing TAVI have concomitant coronary artery disease and may subsequently require coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. However, coronary access after TAVI may be challenging because of the spatial relationship between the transcatheter heart valve frame, commissural posts, valve leaflets, and coronary ostia. Commissural alignment between the native aortic valve and the implanted transcatheter heart valve may play an important role in preserving coronary access. Commissural misalignment may result in a commissural post or valve leaflet being positioned in front of a coronary ostium, potentially interfering with subsequent selective coronary cannulation. In addition to commissural alignment, the geometry and orientation of the transcatheter valve frame relative to the coronary ostia may influence the feasibility of coronary re-access. The Evolut FX Plus transcatheter heart valve incorporates three enlarged frame cells designed to facilitate coronary access. This modification is intended to increase the likelihood that at least one large cell is favorably positioned relative to each coronary ostium. However, prospective data evaluating selective coronary cannulation through these large cells and the relationship between large-cell orientation, commissural alignment, and coronary anatomy in clinical practice remain limited. The study will enroll approximately 122 patients aged 65 years or older with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI with the Evolut FX Plus valve. Immediately after valve implantation, selective cannulation of the left and right coronary arteries through the large-cell frame will be attempted using standard diagnostic coronary catheters. The primary endpoint is the successful selective coronary cannulation rate through the Evolut FX Plus large-cell frame, assessed separately for the left and right coronary arteries. Successful selective coronary cannulation is defined as stable engagement of a diagnostic catheter at the coronary ostium allowing coronary contrast injection. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) performed 3 to 6 months after TAVI will provide a detailed assessment of the spatial relationship between the implanted transcatheter heart valve and the coronary ostia. CT-based assessments will include large cell-to-coronary alignment, alignment between the center of the transcatheter valve leaflet and the coronary ostium, and commissural alignment between the native and transcatheter aortic valves. Follow-up CT will also be used to evaluate findings of valve thrombosis, including leaflet, supravalvular, subvalvular, and sinus hypoattenuation.

Transfemoral TAVI With or Without Coronary Angiogram in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (PURE TAVI)

This study will be conducted in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI is the recommended treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Currently, before undergoing TAVI, most patients undergo a coronary angiography to check whether the coronary arteries are blocked and to assist in appropriate valve sizing. If significant blockages are detected, they are treated before or during TAVI. However, many patients who undergo TAVI are older and often have additional cardiovascular conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, or obesity. These comorbidities increase the risk of complications related to coronary angiography, including kidney injury from contrast dye, bleeding, and vascular complications at the access site. As such, it remains uncertain whether routine coronary angiography is necessary for all patients undergoing TAVI, particularly those without symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia. This study aims to determine whether a TAVI treatment pathway without prior coronary angiography is non-inferior to the standard pathway that includes routine coronary angiography, with or without revascularization, in patients with severe aortic stenosis who do not have typical angina symptoms (defined as Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class \<3). "Non-inferior" means the study seeks to show that omitting routine coronary angiography is at least as effective and safe as the standard approach. All participants will receive a CE-certified Myval™ balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. This device is commercially available and designed to provide accurate positioning and reliable valve function. This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated clinical study sponsored by Rede Optimus (RO), Alte Steinhauserstrasse 1, 6330 Cham, Switzerland. RO conducts independent research to address unresolved questions in vascular medicine. The study is financially supported by Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bilakhia House, Survey No.135/139, Muktanand Marg, Chala, Vapi 396191, Gujarat, India. Approximately 620 patients will be enrolled across 20 centres in 7 European countries. The total study duration is expected to be 42 months, with an 18-month enrollment period and 24-month follow-up for each participant.

A Prospective, Multi-centre, Single Arm, Pivotal Clinical Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of Crea Aortic Valve for Use as a Replacement Aortic Heart Valve

This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical investigation designed to evaluate the safety and performance of an investigational transcatheter aortic valve replacement system in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic valve stenosis who are considered appropriate candidates for transcatheter valve replacement. Eligible subjects will be enrolled at multiple investigational sites and followed according to the clinical investigation plan. The study will assess procedural success, device performance, and clinical safety using predefined clinical and echocardiographic outcome measures. Subjects will undergo scheduled follow-up evaluations to assess device performance, functional status, quality of life, and the occurrence of adverse clinical events over the study period.

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker After TAVR in Severe Aortic Stenosis With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (ARBITAR)

This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, investigator-initiated trial evaluating whether angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Severe AS imposes chronic pressure overload on the left ventricle, leading to LVH as a compensatory response. While initially adaptive, sustained LVH promotes myocardial fibrosis, reduced ventricular compliance, and impaired cardiac function. LVH that persists after valve replacement is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, including a higher risk of heart failure. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or ARBs has been proposed as a strategy to attenuate adverse left ventricular remodeling after valve replacement by inhibiting angiotensin II-mediated hypertrophic and fibrotic signaling. However, evidence in TAVR patients with LVH remains limited, and a small randomized trial of an ACEi reported drug discontinuation in approximately 10% of patients due to dry cough. The ARBITAR trial therefore evaluates the clinical efficacy of an ARB in this population. A total of 632 patients with symptomatic severe AS and LVH who have successfully undergone TAVR within the prior 30 days will be randomized 1:1 to receive an ARB (experimental group) or no ARB (control group), stratified by site and sex. Assigned treatment is continued for up to 24 months, with follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. In the experimental group, the ARB (candesartan, losartan, or valsartan) is up-titrated toward a target dose. ACE inhibitors, direct renin inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors are prohibited in both groups. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause death or admission for heart failure over 2 years. Secondary endpoints include the individual components of the primary endpoint and other clinical events, as well as echocardiographic measures, NT-proBNP, NYHA functional class, and KCCQ-12 score. The primary analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle.

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety and Effectiveness of the DurAVR® THV System

Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, international study. Up to 1054 subjects with a severe native calcific aortic stenosis who are determined by the local Heart Team to have an indication for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR), will be enrolled in the 'All Comers Randomized Cohort'. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive either the DurAVR® THV System or any commercially available and approved Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) from the SAPIEN series or the Evolut series and followed for 10 years. After completion of the All Comers Randomized Cohort, up to 446 additional low-risk subjects will be randomized 1:1 in the 'Low Risk Randomized Continued Access Cohort'. Up to 150 subjects with a failed surgical bioprosthesis who are deemed high surgical risk and who need valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR will be enrolled in a separate nested registry (ViV Registry Cohort) and followed for 5 years. Subjects in the ViV Registry Cohort will only receive the DurAVR® THV.

Aspirin vs Clopidogrel After TAVR

Currently, the optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains still unknown., The purpose of the study is to compare aspirin versus clopidogrel monoantiplatelet therapy for preventive effect on leaflet thrombosis in patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis. This study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized controlled study. Eligible patients will be randomized to aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy after TAVR. Patients will have dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg for 4 weeks after TAVR and then subsequent monoantiplatelet therapy of either aspirin 100 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg according to the randomization. Leaflet thrombosis will be assessed with cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transthoracic echocardiography at 3 months after TAVR. Patients will be clinically followed for 6 months. The primary endpoint is the Incidence of leaflet thrombosis on cardiac CT at 3 months.

Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement (SURTAVI).

The purpose of the study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe, symptomatic Aortic Stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk by randomizing patients to either Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) or TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve® System. Single Arm: The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implementation (TAVI) in patients with severe symptomatic Aortic Stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk with TAVI. This is a non-randomized phase of the pivotal clinical trial.

Application of TAVI at Experienced Interventional Cardiac Centers Without On-site Cardiac Surgery (ATLAS Study)

The purpose of this study is to see if having the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available or not, makes a difference on participant outcomes. Current standard of care is to have this procedure done in a hospital with onsite cardiac surgery available. Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that the TAVR in experienced interventional cardiac centers without on-site cardiac surgery will be safe and effective. Although this is happening clinically in select regions internationally, this change in the clinical application of TAVI requires a rigorous assessment of safety with a robust randomized trial and multicenter international collaboration.

Navitor Japan Study

The Navitor Japan Study is designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the Navitor™ valve used in combination with the FlexNav™ delivery system in a contemporary, real-world setting.

A Registry to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Treatment for Aortic Valve Disease at the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation in Pavia (Italy).

PAVI-TAVI Registry Overview The PAVI-TAVI Registry is an observational study at Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia, Italy. It tracks real-world outcomes of transcatheter heart valve procedures like TAVI (for aortic stenosis), valve-in-valve (VIV), TAVI for aortic insufficiency (TAVI-IAo), and TMVR (for degenerated mitral valves) in patients over 18 years old. Who Can Join Eligible patients include adults treated with these procedures on native aortic valves, failed aortic bioprostheses, or degenerated mitral prostheses/rings. The only exclusion is not providing informed consent. Study Goals The main goal is to evaluate TAVI's safety and effectiveness over 5 years, focusing on all-cause mortality from the initial procedure. Secondary goals assess complication rates, valve function, inflammation markers, heart failure hospitalizations, heart attacks, strokes, and major cardiac events. How It Works No experimental treatments-it's a registry collecting routine clinical data via a secure electronic system. Follow-up happens at your doctor's discretion, ideally at 3 and 12 months, then yearly (often by phone for stable cases). The study aims to enroll 500+ patients.

Safety & Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System-Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Significant Comorbidities in Extreme Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic CoreValve® System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with significant comorbidities in whom the risk of surgical aortic valve replacement has a predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk of ≥50% at 30 days.

CLEAR-AS: CT-FFR-Guided Revascularization in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). While coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is routinely used before aortic valve replacement (AVR) to evaluate coronary anatomy, it lacks physiological assessment of myocardial ischemia. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether integrating functional assessment using CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with CCTA can optimize revascularization decision-making and improve clinical outcomes. A total of 300 severe AS patients scheduled for transcatheter or surgical AVR will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (revascularization decisions guided by both CCTA and CT-FFR) or the control group (decisions guided by CCTA alone). Participants will be followed up for 1 year to assess major adverse cardiovascular events and other clinical outcomes.

Intravenous Iron Supplement for Iron Deficiency in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Iron deficiency is a prevalent nutritional deficiency and a common cause of anemia. Although iron deficiency is traditionally linked to anemia, iron deficiency is prevalent even in the absence of anaemia and in itself limits function and survival. Iron deficiency is a common feature of various chronic diseases, and up to 50% of patients with heart failure have iron deficiency. Iron deficiency is more prevalent the more advanced the disease is and occurs more frequently in women. Iron deficiency comprises absolute iron deficiency (usually defined as ferritin \< 100 ng/ml) as well as functional iron deficiency, in which iron supply is inadequate to meet the demand for the production of red blood cells and other cellular functions despite normal or abundant body iron stores. Iron deficiency is associated with poor exercise capacity, lethargy and reduced quality of life. Results from our studies have shown that iron deficiency is prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis. Some of the symptoms associated with aortic stenosis, such as fatigue, reduced exercise capacity, dyspnoea and cognitive dysfunction, have traditionally been thought to be caused by the haemodynamic derangements precipitated by the valvular stenosis. However, similar symptoms can be brought about by iron deficiency, and the investigators hypothesize that intravenous iron supplement will improve exercise capacity, muscle strength, cognition, health-related quality of life and myocardial function in patients with severe aortic stenosis and iron deficiency. This is a phase 2, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to receive a single intravenous dose of iron isomaltoside (50 patients) or matching placebo (50 patients). The study is designed to show superiority with regard to the primary endpoint in patients assigned to active treatment versus patients allocated to the placebo arm. The main goal is to evaluate the effect of a single dose of intravenous iron isomaltoside on exercise capacity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and iron deficiency. For this study, the investigators have defined as serum ferritin \< 100 µg/l or ferritin between 100 and 300 µg/l in combination with a transferrin saturation \< 20 %.

Safety and Efficacy of the RENATUS® Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, observational, post-market follow-up trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RENATUS® Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

Pre-Emptive LAVA-ECMO for Complex High-Risk TAVR

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of pre-emptive left atrial veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (LAVA-ECMO) in patients undergoing complex and high-risk transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). These patients include adults with severe aortic stenosis who are hemodynamically unstable or at risk of instability due to anatomical complexity. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO reduce the incidence of in-hospital death, intraprocedural cardiac arrest, or emergent cardiac surgery? 2. What are the safety outcomes related to LAVA-ECMO, including major vascular, bleeding, or cardiac structural complications? -This is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study with no comparison group. Participants will: * Be screened for eligibility based on hemodynamic status and anatomical complexity * Undergo pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO cannulation prior to or during TAVR * Receive follow-up assessments at 30 days and 1 year, including clinical evaluation and echocardiography

Observational Study Relating to the Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Evaluated for Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVI).

All patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing evaluation for TAVI are routinely subjected to a series of assessments: * Pre-implantation: thoraco-abdominal CT angiography, coronary angiography, echocardiography, clinical assessment, ECG, and laboratory tests. * Post-implantation: echocardiography, laboratory tests, ECG, assessment of any procedural complications, and a cardiology follow-up visit. This is an observational study, with the aim to monitor over time the population of patients who have undergone TAVI, identifying pre- and post-implant conditions that may negatively impact patient outcomes (both clinical factors and those directly related to the prosthetic implant). Through a 10-year follow-up, the study seeks to determine the incidence of prosthetic failure, as well as the incidence of prosthesis-related complications and major clinical endpoints.

Act on Quality of Life in Patients With aortIc Stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a degenerative process affecting the aortic valve that leads to sclerosis of the valve and limits its opening during cardiac contractions. The prognosis is poorly, with survival rates of only 15-50% at 5 years. AS has a major impact on quality of life, with severely limiting symptoms (dyspnea, chest pain,…) often leading to repeated hospitalizations. It is the most common valvular disease in Europe and North America, and its prevalence is increasing as the population ages. In Europe, 17% of the population is aged 65 or over; in France, this proportion will reach 30% by 2030, corresponding to 16 million people. The incidence of aortic valve sclerosis (early stage AS) is around 25% at age 65, rising to 48% after age 75. The prevalence of aortic valve disease is likely to continue to rise, given the expected evolution of the age pyramid. There is no medical treatment able to slow down the degenerative process of the valve, and the only treatment is aortic valve replacement when the AS becomes constricted and the patient is eligible for an intervention. Aortic valve replacement has historically been performed surgically, with open-chest surgery to remove the damaged valve and replace it with a mechanical or biological valve prosthesis. Now Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has replaced this procedure. This involves inserting a bioprosthesis crimped into a stent via an endovascular route, i.e. without opening the thorax. Deployment of the stent crushes the native valve, leaving the functional bioprosthesis in place. Initially developed for patients contraindicated to surgery, TAVI is now offered as a first-line treatment for patients aged 75 and over. Inexistent before 2010, the number of TAVIs equalled the number of surgeries by 2015, and TAVIs currently account for ¾ of aortic valve procedures (unpublished data).

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study to Evaluate a Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Safety and Efficacy for the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Trial Title: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm target value clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a transcatheter aortic valve system in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis Test device: Transcatheter aortic valve system. Pilot Phase: Clinical Validation of Class III Medical Devices. Study design: prospective, multicenter, single-group target value. Sample size: 120 cases. Intended Use: The Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is indicated for patients with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis by the Comprehensive Heart Team. Objective: This clinical trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transcatheter aortic valve system in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Primary endpoint: 12-month postoperative all-cause mortality All-cause deaths include cardiac death and non-cardiac death. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Device success rate 2. Procedural success rate 3. Delivery system performance 4. Retrieval system performance (e.g. using a recycling system) 5. Exchange system performance 6. Valvular function at Immediately postoperative, 7 days/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 2-5 years follow-up: valve stenosis, regurgitation, valve function (e.g., opening area, pressure gradient), paravalvular leakage 7. Improvement in quality of life at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively 8. Improvement in cardiac function at 7 days/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 2-5 years postoperatively Experimental design: This trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-group clinical study with a target value to evaluate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve system Safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis with 12 months of All-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The mortality rate was the primary study endpoint, and after statistical assumptions and sample size calculations, 120 patients were planned to be enrolled. Patients were clinically followed immediately after valve implantation, 7 days postoperatively/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 2-5 years postoperatively. In this trial, all relevant clinical data were collected, sorted out and statistically analyzed by an independent data management and statistics center and a clinical monitoring institution. All enrolled subjects underwent outpatient follow-up at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, and performed relevant imaging examinations (ultrasound, etc.) and laboratory tests and safety evaluations, and continuous follow-up and cardiac ultrasound examinations were performed annually at 2-5 years to observe the occurrence of adverse events to evaluate the long-term safety of the transcatheter aortic valve system. The safety and efficacy of the transcatheter aortic valve system were evaluated with the subject's 12-month postoperative all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint, and the immediate postoperative device success rate, procedural success, retrieval system performance, valve function, cardiac function improvement, quality of life improvement, all-cause mortality in different follow-up periods, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hemorrhage, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, serious vascular complications, and other TAVR-related complications were taken as the secondary endpoints to assist in evaluating the safety and efficacy of the test product, and to provide a basis for the final official listing and domestic marketing.

Colibri Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve System Study

The Colibri Heart Valve clinical investigation ("COL-01") is a prospective, multicenter, exploratory single arm and controlled clinical investigation compared to recent historical results. This study will be conducted in about 7 European sites. The study will evaluate the safety and performance of the Colibri Transcatheter Aortic Heart Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis via transfemoral access in high surgical risk patients. 30 subjects suffering from symptomatic severe aortic tricuspid valve stenosis and who are at high surgical risk (logistic EuroSCORE I \> 20% or other risk factors not included in this score such as frailty, porcelain aorta, sequelae of chest radiation or logistic EuroSCORE I \< 20% but considered at high risk by local Heart Team evaluation) will be enrolled in this clinical investigation. The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the all-cause mortality at 30 days post implantation. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety and performance of the investigational device at 30 days, 6 and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post implantation.

Safety and Performance Study of the Optimum Transcatheter Aortic Valve

The TAVI (Thubrikar Aortic Valve, Inc.) -1 Study: Safety and Performance Study of the Optimum Transcatheter Aortic Valve- First-in-human study to assess feasibility and safety of the Optimum Aortic Valve Implant