Clinical Research Directory

Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure

The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of small bite versus large bite abdominal incision closure in emergency settings. It will also evaluate the safety and outcomes of each technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does small bite closure reduce the incidence of superficial surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia compared to large bite closure? What are the associated complications of each closure technique? Participants will: Undergo either a small bite or large bite abdominal incision closure during emergency laparotomy Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively Have their wound healing and complications documented and analyzed during respective visits.

A Real-World Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers

WOUNDJOURNEY is a longitudinal, real-world, observational registry designed to capture the full clinical course and patient journey associated with chronic wounds and ulcers. Data are collected during routine care from over 1,400 clinicians across the USA and Puerto Rico using a highly structured certified electronic health record (EHR) or electronic data capture (EDC) system. Data are transmitted daily to the U.S. Wound Registry (USWR), a CMS-recognized Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). The registry captures real-time, research-ready data on patient demographics, comorbidities, wound characteristics, standard-of-care treatments, complications, and advanced therapeutics. It supports robust, fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation by enabling risk-adjusted outcome analysis, comparative effectiveness research, and quality improvement across diverse sites of care.

Real World Evidence with the Debritom+ TM Novel Micro Water Jet Technology At a Single Wound Center

Prospective, single-blinded, single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess rate and frequency of wound healing and associated financial savings, when using Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care as a choice of debridement method, where both arms follow normal wound care practice in use of advanced wound care treatments.