Clinical Research Directory

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Longitudinal vs. Transverse A1 Pulley Release

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different skin incisions used in surgery to treat trigger finger in adult patients. Trigger finger occurs when a finger gets stuck or locks because of swelling of the sheath around the tendons the help move the fingers. The main questions it aims to answer are (1) Does the type of skin cut affect how well the hand works 6 weeks after surgery? (2) Does the type of skin cut affect pain levels, scar healing, and how quickly people return to their normal activities? Orthopaedic surgeons will compare a straight incision along the finger (longitudinal incision) to a incision across the crease in the palm (transverse incision) to see if one type of incision results in better recovery, less pain, a better scar, and higher patient satisfaction with the procedure. Participants who have trigger finger and are indicated for surgery will have surgery to release the pulley in their finger using one of the two types of incisions (assigned by chance). Participants will fill out questionnaires about their hand function and pain before surgery and at follow-up visits. Participants will have their scar checked and rated at about 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery, and report on their pain for the first few days after surgery and when they can return to work and move their finger without pain.

Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers: Longitudinal Opening Versus Complete A1 Pulley Release

Trigger finger is a pathology of the flexor tendons caused by inflammation of the tendon or its sheath, leading to pain, nodules, fibrosis, and limited mobility. Surgical treatment aims to release the space at the level of the A1 pulley, either through longitudinal opening (the standard technique, but associated with recurrence rates of approximately 7.7%) or through complete resection, an emerging approach that may reduce recurrences and the need for reoperations. However, comparative data remain limited, justifying further investigation. This project therefore aims to compare these two surgical techniques to determine which one results in the lowest recurrence rate and to assess their functional outcomes (pain, range of motion). The primary hypothesis is that A1 pulley resection reduces recurrences after one year, while the secondary hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in postoperative pain or mobility.

Conservative Treatment of Trigger Finger

This study is to analyze the effectiveness of a nighttime extension orthosis after receiving a cortisone injection for the treatment of trigger finger to improve pain and restore functional outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that the extension orthosis will improve pain and functional outcomes compared to those without a digital night extension orthosis in those with trigger finger at 12 weeks from the injection.

Comparative Evaluation of Finger Splint, Paraffin, and Peloidotherapy Interventions in the Management of Trigger Finger

Patients aged 18-75 years who present with trigger finger to a tertiary rehabilitation hospital and agree to participate will be included in the study. Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups using block randomization. The first group will use a static finger splint that blocks the proximal interphalangeal joint for 6 weeks, along with a home exercise program. The second group will receive paraffin bath therapy, and the third group will receive peloidotherapy, both in combination with home exercises. All patients will receive education about the disease and activity modification. The finger joint-restricting splint and exercises will be applied for 6 weeks. Evaluations will be conducted at baseline, at the end of the 3rd week, and at the end of the 6th week by a blinded assessor. No analgesic or anti-inflammatory medication will be permitted during the study, and patients will be instructed to avoid using analgesics within 24 hours prior to each assessment.

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Pulley Release With Infiltration, Versus Infiltration Alone in Trigger Finders

Trigger finger is a mechanical problem characterized by pain and catching of digit in flexion. Histological changes of A1 pulley and synovial proliferation have been identified as factors that prompt trigger finger The first-line treatment of trigger finger is conservative with splinting and corticosteroid injection. If the first infiltration fails, either a second infiltration or surgical sectioning of the pulley is proposed. Surgery can be performed by several techniques (open section, percutaneous section with palpatory guidance, or under ultrasound guidance). Percutaneous A1 pulley release under ultrasound guidance consists of cutting the A1 pulley by a percutaneous insertion with small needle under local anaesthesia. The hypothesis of the study is that percutaneous A1 pulley release under ultrasound guidance followed by a corticosteroid injection would be more effective than a second corticosteroid injection alone on complete resolution of the trigger finger symptoms

Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger

There is no study in the literature comparing the effectiveness of ESWT and splint therapy, which are the most commonly used approaches in the treatment of Trigger Finger (TF). The aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of ESWT and splint therapy used in the treatment of TF.

ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger

Recently, two works have proposed the application of Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of trigger finger. Yildirim and colleagues (2016) compared shock waves with corticosteroid infiltration. both methods proved effective at 6 months. The authors suggested that shock wave treatment could be a valid non-invasive therapy option for this pathology. Chen and colleagues (2021) analyzed two different shock wave protocols \[high and low Energy Density Flux (EDF)\] vs placebo. All treatment groups showed improvements within 6 months. The high-energy treatment (EDF 0.01 mj/mm2) demonstrated greater effects on clinical remission and functional recovery compared to the other two groups in the study. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of shock waves vs the use of the orthosis.

The Effects of a Structured Hand Exercise Program on Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To explore the effectiveness of a structured hand exercise program as a conservative treatment for trigger finger.

A Comparison of Metacarpophalangeal Joint Blocking Splint With Relative Motion Extension Splint for Trigger Finger

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of two splint designs in conservative management of trigger finger.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Knife Release for Trigger Finger

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided tri-directional needle knife release in treating patients with trigger finger. The study evaluates safety, effectiveness, and recovery outcomes of a minimally invasive procedure compared to conventional approaches.

Comparison Between 2 Treatment Modalities of Trigger Finger: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger

Trigger finger is a common cause of hand disability and pain in the general population. It is a pathologic condition of the digital pulleys and flexor tendons. Although the pathogenesis is incompletely clear and multifactorial, the most common cause of the trigger finger is the thickened flexor tendon and/or thickened first annular (A1) pulley located at the metacarpophalangeal joint. Currently, ultrasound is considered an effective and valuable tool for assessing the trigger finger, providing static and dynamic evaluations of this condition and a comparison with the adjacent normal digits. Recently, it has been reported that ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley precise release using a needle knife has received increasing attention in the clinical treatment of trigger fingers and achieved good results. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study comparing the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release with a needle knife and the ultrasonic-guided steroid injection in treating trigger fingers.

Comparing the Effects of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Splinting in the Treatment of Trigger Finger

The goal of this study is to compare the effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and splinting in the treatment of trigger finger. Participants will: Be randomized into two groups (shockwave group and splint group). Visit the clinic once a week for four weeks for therapy. Keep a diary of their symptoms, which will be reviewed at six weeks.

The TriggerHappy Trial

This is a prospective randomized multicenterstudy focusing on PROMs after primary corticoid injection for triggerfinger with a comparison of two different injection techniques.

Effectiveness of Audiovisual Versus Written Postoperative Instructions for Patients Undergoing Minor Hand Procedures

The utility and effectiveness of video-based instructions (VBI) versus standard written instructions was not previously investigated in hand surgery; thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of audiovisual instruction as compared to regular verbal instructions given to patients undergoing common hand procedures, including instruction recall and compliance, patient education, patient satisfaction with the information given, patient satisfaction with operative experience.