Clinical Research Directory

The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Iliofemoral Study

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter, single-arm, clinical study to evaluate the performance, safety and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prevention

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment after a first venous thromboembolism based on individualized risk assessments of recurrent VTE and major bleeding risks. Participants will be asked to fill in a questionnaire and take a buccal swab, which are used for an individual estimation of the risks of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Based on these risks a treatment advise will be made, or randomised in a subgroup of patients.

The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent IVC Study

This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction in adult patients.

inDividual, Targeted thrombosIS Prophylaxis Versus the Standard 'One Size Fits All' Approach in Patients Undergoing Total hIp or Total kNee replaCemenT

After hip or knee replacement all patients receive a standardized treatment with blood thinners, this medication is called thrombosis prophylaxis. However, despite this standard treatment some individuals still develop venous thrombosis (VTE), while others experience bleeding. This indicates that not all patients have the same VTE risk following surgery. Individualizing the amount of thrombosis prophylaxis following surgery might lead to less thrombotic and bleeding events. In this study the investigators individualize the treatment with thrombosis prophylaxis based on the medical history of a patient. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Can thrombosis prophylaxis be shortened in patients with a low VTE risk to decrease the risk of bleeding without increasing the risk of VTE? Does an increase in the dose and duration of thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with a high VTE risk reduce the risk of VTE without inducing an unacceptable risk of bleeds? Researchers will compare both the shortened treatment in low VTE risk patients and the intensified and extended treatment in high VTE risk patients with the standard treatment to assess the risk of VTE and bleeding in comparison to the standard treatment. Participants will receive 4 questionnaires to evaluate whether they have experienced a VTE or bleed. For this study no additional hospital visits are necessary.

Clonal Hematopoiesis and NETs Formation in Venous Thrombosis (CLODETTE)

Thrombo-embolic venous diseases are represented by deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. In some patients with repeated thrombosis or occurrence of thrombosis in unusual sites, the etiological workup remains negative, which represents a problem for the management of the anticoagulant treatments. Recently, two factors have been identified as important in the physiopathology of hemostasis and coagulation: the presence of clonal hematopoiesis of indetermined potential (CHIP) and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). In this study, these two factors will be studied in patients with repeated venous thrombosis or thrombosis occurring in unusual site.

TRanEXamic Acid to Decrease Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Individuals Anticoagulated for Venous Thromboembolism Pilot Study

T-REX HMB is a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to assess the feasibility of a full trial comparing tranexamic acid (TXA) to placebo in decreasing HMB in premenopausal individuals anticoagulated for VTE. Strong data supports TXA as an effective and safe agent at decreasing HMB in the general population, but its use in those with VTE has been limited by a lack of data for its efficacy in anticoagulated individuals and theoretical concerns of its prothrombotic effects.