Clinical Research Directory

A Study of Disitamab Vedotin in Previously Treated Solid Tumors That Express HER2

This clinical trial is studying advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Once a solid tumor has grown very large in one spot or has spread to other places in the body, it is called advanced or metastatic cancer. Participants in this study must have head and neck cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer. In the first part of the study, participants must have tumors that have a marker called HER2. This clinical trial uses an experimental drug called disitamab vedotin (DV). DV is a type of antibody-drug conjugate or ADC. ADCs are designed to stick to cancer cells and kill them. In this study, all participants will get DV once every 2 weeks. This study is being done to see if DV works to treat different types of solid tumors that express HER2. It will also test how safe the drug is for participants. This trial will also study what side effects happen when participants get the drug. A side effect is anything a drug does to your body besides treating the disease.

A Study of E7386 in Combination With Other Anticancer Drug(s) in Participants With Solid Tumor

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of E7386 in combination with other anticancer drug(s), and to determine the optimal dose of E7386 in combination with lenvatinib in endometrial carcinoma (EC) (for EC Dose Optimization Part only).

A Study of LY4257496 in Participants With Cancer (OMNIRAY)

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LY4257496 alone and as part of relevant standard of care (SOC) combination therapy in participants with Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR)-positive advanced breast, colorectal, prostate, and endometrial cancer. The study will also evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LY4257529 to identify cancer with high levels of a protein called GRPR. This is a 2-part study. Participation could last up to 36 weeks or until your tumor progresses.

A Study of LY4175408 in Participants With Advanced Cancer

The purpose of this study is to measure the safety and efficacy of LY4175408 in participants with selected advanced cancer. In addition, this study will evaluate how much LY4175408 gets into the bloodstream, how it is broken down, and how long it takes the body to get rid of it. Participation could last up to 4 years.

A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors

The goal of the Dose Escalation phase of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity to determine the preliminary recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of NKT3964 in adults with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The goal of the Expansion phase of the study is to evaluate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of NKT3964 at the RDE based on objective response rate (ORR) and determine the preliminary recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).

Registry Platform Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer

The purpose of the project is to set up a national, prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study, a tumor registry platform, to document uniform data on characteristics, molecular diagnostics, treatment and course of disease, to collect patient-reported outcomes and to establish a decentralized biobank for patients with advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer (OC) or advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) in Germany.

A Study of DM002 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

The goal of study： The study has two parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Dose Expansion. In Part 1, a few participants will receive the lowest dose of study drug. The study team will make sure it is safe and tolerated before enrolling new participants at a higher dose of study drug. There will be up to six or more dose levels of study drug tested (called cohorts). Which dose you receive will depend on how many participants have taken part in the study before you. The purpose of Part 1 of the study is to evaluate the safety of the study drug at different dose levels, to understand what your body does to the study drug, and to find the best dose of study drug in people who have advanced solid tumor cancers. In Part 2, participants will receive the best dose level that was determined in Part 1 of the study. The purpose of Part 2 of the study is to evaluate the safety of the study drug at the dose level determined in Part 1, to understand what your body does to the study drug, and to see how your cancer responds to the study drug. Participants will: Participants will have 17 or more visits to the study centre. This study has a screening phase of up to 28 days , and a treatment phase with cycles of 21 days each. Participants will also have an End of Treatment (EOT) visit 21 days after the final study drug treatment, and a Follow-up visit 30 days after the EOT visit . Participants will be contacted by telephone every 3 months after the Follow-up visit to check on the wellbeing and record any new anticancer therapy they may have started.

A Study of LY4170156 in Participants With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY4170156, is safe, tolerable and effective in participants with advanced solid tumors. The study is conducted in two parts - phase Ia (dose-escalation, dose-optimization) and phase Ib (dose-expansion). The study will last up to approximately 4 years.

Durvalumab With or Without Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

A study to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (paclitaxel + carboplatin) followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without olaparib for patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Cervical Cytology DNA Methylation for Endometrial Lesion Screening and Follow-up

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the accuracy of a novel molecular test for screening and monitoring endometrial lesions in women at medium-to-high risk for endometrial cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the sensitivity and specificity of the CISENDO test (a DNA methylation test on cervical cytology samples) for detecting histologically confirmed endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or invasive endometrial cancer? * How do DNA methylation levels change during the follow-up of endometrial lesions? Researchers will compare the results of the CISENDO test to the results from the standard diagnostic procedure (hysteroscopy with histology) to see if the molecular test can reliably identify high-risk lesions and track disease progression. Participants will: * Provide a residual liquid-based cervical cytology sample for the CISENDO test. * Undergo a standard diagnostic hysteroscopy examination (with or without biopsy) for comparison. * Some participants will return for follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months for repeat methylation testing and/or hysteroscopy to monitor their condition.

DETERMINE Trial Treatment Arm 02: Atezolizumab in Adult, Paediatric and Teenage/Young Adult Patients With Cancers With High Tumour Mutational Burden (TMB) or Microsatellite Instability-high (MSI-high) or Proven Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency (CMMRD) Disposition

This clinical trial is looking at a drug called atezolizumab. Atezolizumab is approved as standard of care treatment for adult patients with urothelial cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and triple negative breast cancer. This means it has gone through clinical trials and been approved by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK. Atezolizumab works in patients with these types of cancers which have certain changes in the cancer cells called high tumour mutational burden (TMB) or high microsatellite instability (MSI) or proven (previously diagnosed) constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). Investigators now wish to find out if it will be useful in treating patients with other cancer types which are also TMB/MSH-high or show CMMRD. If the results are positive, the study team will work with the NHS and the Cancer Drugs Fund to see if these drugs can be routinely accessed for patients in the future. This trial is part of a trial programme called DETERMINE. The programme will also look at other anti-cancer drugs in the same way, through matching the drug to rare cancer types or ones with specific mutations.

Evaluate BL-M17D1 in Patients w/HER2-Expressing/Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

The objective of this study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of BL-M17D1 in patients with HER2-Expressing or HER2-Mutant Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors.

Study of LY3537982 in Cancer Patients With a Specific Genetic Mutation (KRAS G12C)

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the study drug, LY3537982, is safe and effective in cancer patients who have a specific genetic mutation (KRAS G12C). Patients must have already received or were not able to tolerate the standard of care, except for specific groups who have not had cancer treatment. The study will last up to approximately 4 years.

GnRHa + Letrozole in Obese Progestin-insensitive Endometrial Cancer Patients

To investigate the efficacy of GnRHa plus letrozole in obese progestin-insensitive EEC patients.

The Role of POLE Mutation in High Risk Endometrial Cancer.

The actual role of POLE mutations in high-risk endometrial cancer is undetermined. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the prevalence of POLE mutations in high-risk endometrial cancer case? What is the impact of POLE mutations in real world high-risk endometrial cancer case?

GnRHa + Letrozole in Non-obese Progestin-insensitive Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Hyperplasia Patients

To investigate the efficacy of GnRHa plus letrozole vs Diane-35 plus metformin in non-obese progestin-insensitive early-stage endometrial cancer (EEC) and atypical hyperplasia(EAH) patients asking for conservative treatment.

Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue

This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.

DOvEEgene/WISE Genomics: Diagnosing Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Early Using Genomics

This study aims to develop and validate a test for detecting ovarian and endometrial cancers early. It relies on detecting somatic mutations that are associated with these cancers from a uterine pap test. A saliva sample is also collected that acts as an internal control and has the ability to detect deleterious germline mutations associated with common hereditary cancers (such as breast, ovarian, endometrial, colon, and pancreatic cancers). A machine learning classifier is then used to discriminate between cancer and benign disease.

A Three-arm Randomized Phase II Study of Dostarlimab Alone or With Bevacizumab Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Recurrent Gynecological Clear Cell Carcinoma: DOVE (APGOT-OV7/ ENGOT-ov80 Study)

Multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II clinical study comparing Dostarlimab +/- Bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy in patients with gynecological clear cell carcinoma. 198 subjects will be enrolled in this study and will be assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. 1. Group A: Dostarlimab monotherapy * First 3 cycles: Dostalimab 500mg every 3 weeks, IV * 4 cycles \~ up to 24 months: Dostalimab 1000mg every 6 weeks, IV 2. Group B: Dostarlimab + Bevacizumab combination therapy * First 3 cycles: Dostalimab 500mg every 3 weeks, IV * 4 cycles \~ up to 24 months: Dostalimab 1000mg every 6 weeks, IV * Bevacizumab administered IV at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity 3. Group C: General chemotherapy (one of Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and Gemcitabine)

Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Endometrial Cancer After Surgery With Curative Intent (MK-3475-B21 / KEYNOTE-B21 / ENGOT-en11 / GOG-3053)

The purpose of this study is to compare pembrolizumab + adjuvant chemotherapy with placebo + adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed radiographically by the investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease recurrence, and with respect to overall survival (OS). The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab + adjuvant chemotherapy is superior to placebo + adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, with respect to DFS as assessed radiographically by the investigator or by histopathologic confirmation of suspected disease recurrence, and with respect to OS.

Study of Induction PD-1 Blockade (Nivolumab) in Patients With Surgically Complete Resectable Mismatch Repair Deficient Endometrial Cancer (NIVEC)

phase 2 clinical trial to confirm the pathological complete response rate of PD-1 blocker use in patients with Mismatch Repair Deficiency(MMRd) endometrial cancer that can be completely resected surgically.

First-line Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Combination With Pembrolizumab, Followed by Maintenance Pembrolizumab With or Without Nesuparib, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced or Recurrent MMR-proficient (pMMR) Endometrial Cancer

The goal of this study is listed below. Part A (Safety Run-in Phase) : To determine feasibility of pembrolizumab and nesuparib combination as maintenance therapy in patients with MMR-proficient advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Feasibility is defined as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate less than or equal to 33%. Part B (Randomization Phase) : To evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab and nesuparib combination/ pembrolizumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy in patients with MMR-proficient advanced stage and recurrent endometrial cancer. Efficacy will be assessed by investigator assessed progression free survival (PFS) as assessed by RECIST 1.1.

Uterine Manipulator Versus No Uterine Manipulator in Endometrial Cancer Trial

Minimally invasive surgery is the recommended approach in endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on the results of two randomized controlled trials, given its advantages without compromised oncologic outcomes. The uterine manipulator is commonly used in benign and malignant pathologies to perform a laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. However, although regularly used, the uterine manipulator adoption in EC is a controversial technical aspect due to the raised concerns regarding the possible risk of disruption of the tumor mass, the spread of malignant cells, and seeding of the disease, particularly at the level of the vaginal cuff or spread of tumor cells, with increased risk of recurrence and death due to EC. On that basis, given that hysterectomy without a uterine manipulator is feasible, only a randomized controlled trial comparing oncologic outcomes in EC patients after use versus not use of the uterine manipulator will be able to provide high-quality evidence to answer this critical question and allow or exclude the use of a uterine manipulator during minimally invasive hysterectomy for EC.

Optimal Margin Evaluation of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Postoperative Treatment of Endometrial and Cervical Cancer

Online adaptive radiotherapy has demonstrated to be feasible to reduce inter-fractional radiotherapy errors as it re-optimizes treatment plan every fraction. To investigate the extent and value of margin reduction，we conduct a prospective clinical trial to determine the optimal margin and toxicity of smaller margin.