Clinical Research Directory

Fall, Fracture and Frailty

This project aims to improve the global outcome for an aging individual after a traumatic fall, through identifying conditions contributing to a fall and promoting recovery and rehabilitation. Through better understanding 'falling phenotype', the ultimate aim is to prevent future complications, as well as new falls and fractures in the growing older population.

Anterior vs Posterior Approach for Hip Hemiarthroplasty

Randomized trial to evaluate the role of the anterior vs posterior approach regarding hemiarthroplasty of the hip. The Investigators' hypothesis is that the muscle sparing anterior approach may result in improved function in the short term, which may allow shorter hospital stay and quicker return to prior level of function.

MDR - PMCF Study for Taperloc Complete Stems

The objective of this consecutive series PMCF study is to collect data confirming safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the Taperloc Complete stems when used for primary or revision total hip arthroplasty (implants) at 1,3,5,7 and 10-year follow-up\*. Since Taperloc Complete was introduced to the EU in 2010, all available retrospective data will be collected from each patient and a prospective aspect to the study will be necessary to reach the 10-year time point.

Comparison of Cryoablation of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) to Fascia Iliaca Catheter in Patients With a Hip Fracture

The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with hip fractures who undergo cryoablation of the PENG have improved pain control 30 days from surgery when compared to those who have a fascia iliaca catheter.

HIP Fracture Oral thromboPROphylaxis (Hip PRO Pilot)

As our Canadian population ages, hip fractures in these older adults are becoming very common. The best treatment for the majority of these injuries is urgent treatment with surgery. However, the hip fracture itself, the surgery required, and the immobility following these injuries are all risk factors for developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis or DVT) and blood clots in the lungs (pulmonary embolism or PE). These complications are a common cause of death in patients with hip fractures and often result in prolonged medical treatment and hospital stays. Patients with hip fractures who require surgery are traditionally given injectable blood thinners to help prevent blood clots; however, these medications are costly, may not be tolerated well, and can be difficult to take, as prescribed. Oral blood thinning medications are being used more commonly, but it is unknown which of these medications is the most effective in preventing blood clots in patients after a hip fracture. Thrombelastography (TEG) technology uses a small sample of blood to evaluate a person's clotting ability. Our research has used TEG technology to evaluate blood clotting risk after hip fracture surgery and the investigators have found that platelets may play an important role in abnormal blood clotting after a hip fracture. The investigators have also shown that acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or Aspirin) may help reduce the abnormal platelet hyperactivity associated with blood clotting. This medication warrants investigation for blood clot prevention after hip fracture. The investigators propose to directly compare different oral medication regimens after hip fracture surgery, in order to determine which is safest and most effective in preventing blood clots. Our multi-disciplinary research team includes physicians, surgeons, and scientists with experience evaluating different medications for blood clot prevention. Our results will help determine the best medical treatment for preventing DVT and PE, which will benefit patients with hip fractures worldwide.

Effects of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Applied in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.

In this study, it was aimed to compare the multimodal analgesia application or the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block methods in patients undergoing hip surgery. The effectiveness and benefit rate of the PENG block in postoperative pain will be evaluated. Postoperative pain, need for additional analgesia, range of motion of the hip joint, mobilization time, length of hospital time and adverse events in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery with and without PENG block will be investigated.

AI-Supported Physiotherapy After Hip Fracture in Frail Older Adults

Purpose Hip fractures in older adults often cause a serious loss of strength and independence. Physical therapy helps people recover, but patients do not always exercise consistently or correctly. This study tests whether adding an automated motivational support tool to physical therapy helps patients recover better than physical therapy alone. How the tool works The tool uses a regular camera to record movement during exercise. It does not use facial recognition. It gives the patient simple, encouraging messages, such as "great job" or "keep going." It does not give medical advice or correct the patient's movements during the session. The research team reviews the recordings later; they are not reviewed in real time. Who can join People age 70 or older who had surgery for a hip fracture and are staying in the Orthogeriatrics Unit at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, in Madrid, Spain. What happens in the study Forty-eight people will take part. Half will receive standard physical therapy plus one daily session with the motivational tool. Half will receive standard physical therapy alone. Researchers will measure physical performance with a short walking and balance test. They will measure it three times: at the start, when the patient leaves the hospital, and one month later. Why it matters This study will show whether an automated motivational tool helps patients recover more strength and function after a hip fracture.

Cervical Myelopathy in Hip Fracture Patients

Recent evidence has demonstrated a high rate of undiagnosed cervical myelopathy in patients presenting with hip fractures from a ground level fall. Identification and treatment of cervical myelopathy can help prevent falls and future fragility fractures. The purpose of this study is to screen ground level fall hip fracture patients for cervical myelopathy using a history, physical exam, and then offer an MRI if indicated.

Anesthesia and Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in the Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery Platform Trial (ANDES Platform Trial)

The ANDES Platform Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, adaptive randomized controlled platform trial in patients aged 65 years or older undergoing surgery for hip fracture. The trial evaluates whether enhanced anesthesia techniques reduce perioperative neurocognitive disorders compared with standard anesthesia care. The platform includes two randomization processes. In the first randomization, eligible participants are assigned to an active platform intervention-currently a preoperative regional nerve block or perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion-or to a shared standard-anesthesia control. Participants for whom general anesthesia is planned may also enter a second, nested randomization and are assigned in a fixed 1:1 ratio to total intravenous anesthesia or volatile inhalational anesthesia, regardless of whether they participate in the first randomization. A non-surgical cognitive control cohort is included to characterize changes in cognitive test performance over time without exposure to surgery or study interventions. The Data Monitoring Committee reviews accumulating trial data and makes recommendations to the Trial Steering Committee, which determines whether platform interventions should continue, be modified, advance, or stop.

Delivery and Implementation of a Randomised Crossover Trial on Thrombosis

What is the Study About? The DIRECT study (Delivery and Implementation of a Randomised Crossover Trial on Thrombosis) is a large research project investigating the best way to prevent blood clots (thrombosis) in people who break their hip. The study will compare two common treatments: aspirin (a tablet) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, an injection). Every year, thousands of people in the UK suffer a hip fracture, which often requires surgery and hospital care. After a hip fracture, patients are at risk of developing serious blood clots in their legs (deep vein thrombosis, DVT) or lungs (pulmonary embolism, PE), which can be life-threatening. Currently, doctors prescribe different medications to prevent these clots, but there is uncertainty about which treatment is best for people with hip fractures. Why is This Study Needed? Blood clot prevention is vital for hip fracture patients, but the current recommended treatment (LMWH) involves daily injections for 28 days, which some patients find uncomfortable and difficult to manage at home. Aspirin, a tablet taken by mouth, is a much simpler alternative, but there is not enough evidence to confirm whether it is as effective and safe as LMWH in this group of patients. The DIRECT study will help doctors and the NHS understand whether aspirin could be a safe and cost-effective alternative to LMWH. If aspirin is found to be just as effective, it could make treatment easier for patients and save millions of pounds for the NHS. How Will the Study Work? The study will involve 96 hospitals across the UK and will include over 21,000 patients aged 60 and older who have broken their hip. Hospitals will be randomly assigned to use either aspirin or LMWH as their standard treatment for a set period. After this, they will switch to the other treatment. This approach allows researchers to compare the two treatments fairly. All data will be collected from national NHS databases, which routinely record patient care and outcomes. This means patients will not need to do anything extra or attend additional follow-ups. What Are the Expected Benefits? This study will provide clear evidence on which treatment is better for preventing blood clots while minimising risks like bleeding. If aspirin is shown to be as effective as LMWH, it could: * Reduce the need for daily injections, making treatment more comfortable for patients. * Lower NHS costs, as aspirin is much cheaper than LMWH. * Provide a simple, widely available treatment option for older adults with hip fractures. How Will Patient Data Be Protected? The study will use anonymised patient data from NHS records. This means that all personal details will be kept confidential and protected according to strict NHS and research regulations. Patients who do not want their data to be used can opt out via NHS data-sharing policies. Summary The DIRECT study is an important project that will help improve care for hip fracture patients by determining whether aspirin can be a safe and effective alternative to injections for preventing blood clots. The results will help shape future NHS guidelines, ensuring patients receive the best possible treatment while reducing unnecessary costs and discomfort.

PENG Block + LIA For Endoprosthesis Surgery

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new local anesthesia technique can control pain as well as the standard spinal anesthesia for adults having hip endoprosthesis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the new local anesthesia technique as effective as standard spinal anesthesia in managing pain during the first two days after surgery? * Does the new technique allow participants to move their leg sooner after the operation? Researchers will compare the new local anesthesia technique (numbing medicine injected directly around the hip joint) to standard spinal anesthesia (a numbing injection in the back) to see if the new technique works just as well for pain control while possibly causing fewer side effects like nausea. Participants who join this study will be randomly placed into one of two groups. One group will receive the standard spinal anesthesia before their surgery. The other group will receive the new local anesthesia technique before their surgery. After the operation, researchers will track the amount of extra pain medicine each participant uses and will check their ability to move their hip, knee, and foot.

The Effect of TENS on Pain and Analgesic Consumption

The surgical treatment of an individual with osteoarthritis and hip fracture is provided by hip replacement surgery. While restructuring the joint surfaces with surgery, it is aimed to provide both hip joint movements and to treat pain. Intense perioperative pain after hip replacement is common due to inflammatory agents and surgical intervention (eg, involvement of soft tissue and sensory nerves). Inadequately treated acute postoperative pain causes longer hospital stay, limited and delayed bed rest, decreased compliance with physical therapy, and an increased incidence of postoperative complications. It is thought that this method, which can be effective in the pain control of the patient, will be beneficial for the patient both physiologically and psychologically by reducing pain and discomfort. The most important advantage of TENS; It can be easily applied by nurses and easily taught to patients or families. The nurse has a great role in the follow-up of the patient after the surgery, as she/ he is with the patient for 24 hours. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the number of studies showing the effectiveness of TENS application in patients who underwent hip prosthesis, where studies were conducted with patients with knee gonarthrosis, is limited. In this direction, the aim of the study is to examine the effect of TENS application on patients' pain level and analgesic use in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Patient-Centered Education After Hip Fracture Surgery

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of a structured patient-centered educational program on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving the educational program in addition to routine care or a control group receiving routine care only. The study will assess whether the educational program improves postoperative recovery, functional independence, and pain outcomes following hip fracture surgery.

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Hip Fracture Surgery

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication in elderly patients undergoing surgical repair for hip fractures, often triggered by acute pain, surgical stress, neuroinflammation, and opioid consumption. Although spinal anesthesia using bupivacaine is commonly performed, local anesthetics alone often require additional systemic rescue opioids for postoperative pain relief, which can further increase delirium risk. Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that has demonstrated neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and opioid-sparing effects. The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether adding intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative delirium compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine alone in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: * Dexmedetomidine Group: Receives hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg) combined with 5 µg dexmedetomidine intrathecally. * Control Group: Receives hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg) combined with normal saline intrathecally. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative delirium evaluated using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) twice daily during the first 48 hours following surgery. Secondary assessments include the duration and severity of delirium episodes, spinal block characteristics, hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesic consumption, sedation levels, adverse events, and total hospital length of stay.

Endoprosthetic Replacement for Pathological Fractures of the Hip: A 35-year Update

This study will be based on a retrospective review of patients who received endoprosthetic reconstruction for pathologic fracture of the proximal femur. The objectives would be two-fold: (1) to compare rates ofambulation, pain, and survival to the historic cohort and (2) to identify predictors of ambulation in the current population.

Validation of the French Version of the New Mobility Score (NMS)

The incidence of hip fractures in France is 50,000 cases per year among women and 16,000 among men, with a 1-year mortality rate of 20-24%. After a fracture, 10-30% of patients become functionally dependent. The increasing aging of the population and the rise in dependency are likely to worsen the situation of older patients in hospital settings. Several tools are available to assess functional independence, including the New Mobility Score (NMS), which evaluates mobility through three domains: mobility indoors, mobility outdoors, and shopping activities. The NMS has shown good performance in predicting patient mortality and functional recovery, and its use is recommended in clinical practice. However, the French version of the NMS has not yet been validated. The French validation of the NMS is important to facilitate its implementation in clinical practice and research, particularly because of its simplicity and the need for rapid assessment tools for healthcare professionals. A French version of the NMS has been translated, and the MOB-SCORE study aims to assess its reliability and validity among healthcare professionals caring for patients with hip fractures.

Treatment of Sub-capital Fractures of Hip Joint by Using TriboFit™ Acetabular Buffer

The purpose of this study is to determine the performance and efficacy during 6 and 12 month post operation. 1. determine changes in patient pain level 2. determine changes in patient functionality 3. determine changes in patient life quality

Conventional Spinal Anaesthesia Versus Fractional Spinal Anaesthesia on Hemodynamics

compare the systemic haemodynamic response to fractional spinal anaesthesia versus conventional spinal anaesthesia , in a group of elderly and comorbid patients with hip fracture.

HIP Fracture Accelerated Surgical TreaTment And Care tracK 2 Trial

The HIP ATTACK-2 trial is a multicentre, international, parallel group randomized controlled trial to determine whether accelerated surgery for hip fracture in patients with acute myocardial injury is superior to standard care in reducing death at 90 days after randomization. The trial will also assess secondary outcomes at 90 days after randomization: inability to independently walk 3 metres, time to first mobilization (first standing and first full weight bear), composite and individual assessment of major complications (e.g., mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, acute congestive heart failure, and stroke), delirium, length of stay, pain, and quality of life.

Rehabilitation After a Hip Fracture: the Effects of Dietary Protein and Exercise on Bone and Muscle Health and Quality of Life

Hip fractures often lead to functional limitations, loss of independence, weight loss and decreased well-being. Only half of the patients regain their functional level and 24% die within the following year. Financial consequences are significant due to costly surgery and long-term care. Hip fracture incidence is expected to increase sharply due to the ageing population, reducing accessibility to and quality of rehabilitation care. Therefore, optimizing treatment is essential. Previous protein and exercise studies showed improved muscle and bone health in healthy or frail community-dwelling older adults, but effects in older hip fracture patients are not known. Better rehabilitation may improve bone and muscle health, nutritional status, quality of life, lower costs and lower burden for healthcare. The overall objective is to investigate the effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of a protein-enriched diet and resistance exercise for 3 months compared to usual care on bone and muscle health, and quality of life in older adults recovering from an acute hip fracture.

Zoledronate Early to Hip Fracture Patients - Safe and Effective?

To prevent hip fracture patients for having another fracture, secondary fracture preventing medication should be given as soon as possible. Zoledronate is the most efficient bisphosphonate and is given as an intravenous infusion once yearly. However, the appropriate time to initiate zoledronate treatment after a hip fracture has not yet been established. To clarify the optimal timing of zoledronate to hip fracture patients we have designed a double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized non-inferiority trial to compare if zoledronate administered early (within 5 days) after hip fracture surgery is as good as zoledronate given late (3 months) after hip fracture surgery.

Stronger at Home: Improving Outcomes for Older Adults After Hip Fracture

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of a new 14-week individually-tailored home-based rehabilitation program called "Stronger at Home" with usual care in improving functional recovery in community-dwelling older adults after hip fractures. The main question this trial aims to answer are: • Is the Stronger at Home program more effective than usual care in improving functional recovery at the end of the 14-week intervention? secondary questions include: * What is the cost-utility of the Stronger at Home program compared to usual care at 3.5 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge? * Does the program have a sustained impact on functional recovery at 6 months and 12 months post-discharge? Participants in the trial will be asked to engage in the following tasks: * Participate in the Stronger at Home program, which includes using a self-directed toolkit consisting of educational resources and an illustrated exercise program. * Follow the guidelines provided in the toolkit for gradually increasing exercise intensity and incorporating different types of exercises into their daily life. The effects of the Stronger at Home program will be compared to those of usual care.

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Mobile Application in Postoperative Rehabilitation

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile application in improving postoperative rehabilitation outcomes among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block Study

Hip fractures are common in older adults and are often associated with severe pain, making it difficult for patients to sit for spinal anesthesia before surgery. Peripheral nerve blocks may improve pain control and facilitate patient positioning, but it remains uncertain whether the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block provides advantages over the traditional femoral nerve block during the spinal anesthesia procedure.