Clinical Research Directory

Comparing IVF/ICSI Cycle Outcomes of Post Ovulation Ovarian Stimulation Protocol With Elonva Without GnRH Antagonist to Follicular Phase Day 2 Stimulation Fixed Day 5 Antagonist Protocol

There are several approaches to the timing of antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles. The primary goal is indeed to prevent premature ovulation, which could jeopardize the success of the cycle There is an emerging concept that suggests that the progesterone produced by the corpus luteum (formed after ovulation) might be sufficient to prevent further ovulation, obviating the need for antagonist or exogenous progesterone administration. This hypothesis relies on the natural regulatory mechanisms of the menstrual cycle to maintain a progesterone-dominated environment post-ovulation. We hypothesized that this approach would minimize treatment costs /burden without having an impact on the outcome.

Protocol with Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) from the Beginning of Stimulation Versus Protocol with GnRH Antagonists for Ovarian Stimulation in Patients Undergoing DUOSTIM with Embryo Accumulation for PGT-A.

The PPOS protocol (Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation) involves avoiding ovulation during ovarian stimulation with progesterone. It is a reliable and safe protocol that has been widely used in recent years for in vitro fertilization, as it reduces the number of injections needed during controlled ovarian stimulation and is more cost-effective for patients. The aim of this study is to compare two methods of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the PPOS protocol (Group A) and the conventional protocol with injected antagonists (Group B). The goal is to determine whether both methods are equally effective in obtaining euploid embryos in the context of double ovarian stimulation.