Clinical Research Directory

Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Bridging Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

A phase III, multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial will evaluate two thrombolytic agents for the treatment of acute large vessel occlusion stroke within 4.5 hours from symptoms onset: intravenous tenecteplase bridging mechanical thrombectomy vs. intravenous alteplase bridging mechanical thrombectomy.

Circulating Non-coding RNA in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Endovascular Treatment (EVTRNA)

EVTRNA is to analyze the differentiated expression pattern of circular RNA (circRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and micro-RNA (miRNA) by next-generation sequencing in acute ischemic stroke patients before and/or after endovascular treatment. The candidate circRNA/lncRNA/miRNA will be verified as the biomarker and regulator for progression and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke with endovascular treatment. Further, the candidate non-coding RNA will be used to evaluate the effect of endovascular treatment on both peripheral and central immune after stroke.

Treatment With Endovascular Intervention for STroke Patients With Existing Disability

TESTED will compare the risks and benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) to medical management (no EVT) in ischemic stroke patients who have a blockage in one of the large blood vessels in the brain and have a moderate-to-severe disability prior to their stroke.

Advancing Reperfusion Therapy for Ischemic Stroke (ARTS): Tenecteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion (MeVO) for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Results from recent several trials provided data showing limits to the effectiveness of thrombectomy for ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusions.The benefit-risk profile of thrombolysis for these patients has never been investigated. We initiated a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg, maximum dose 25mg) compared to standard medical care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) within 4.5 to 24 hours from symptom onset.

Effects of Neuronavigated Theta Burst Stimulation in Therapy of Post-stroke Aphasia

Aphasia is an impairment in the ability to express and/or understand language, commonly observed after stroke to the language dominant (left) hemisphere. Despite natural tendency to spontaneous functional recovery in the first months post stroke and language improvement due to application of behavioral speech and language therapy (SLT), many aphasic patients do not achieve satisfactory level of verbal communication. The aim of the planned study is to explore the potential of the noninvasive repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a therapeutic tool for aphasia in addition to traditional behavioral therapy. In case of aphasia, studies on therapeutic effectiveness of rTMS aim to increase the activity of the language-dominant left cerebral hemisphere, which may be achieved in an indirect manner by inhibiting the activity of the opposite (right) hemisphere or in a direct manner by increasing the excitability of preserved language areas in the left hemisphere. In our study, we plan to administer the newest form of rTMS called Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), which is safer than the conventional rTMS, even when used in the perilesional area. Computer-based neuronavigation system will be implemented to precisely localize stimulation targets, control administration of stimuli during rTMS sessions, and evaluate differences between participants regarding deviations from established stimulation points. 45 patients (all right-handed, polish native speakers, aged 18-75 years, diagnosed with non-fluent aphasia) will be enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups: 1) a group with excitatory intermittent TBS of the left hemisphere (iTBS group), 2) a group with inhibitory continuous TBS of the right hemisphere (cTBS group), 3) a group with sham TBS (sTBS group as a control group). Specific forms of stimulation will be carried out for three consecutive weeks (Monday to Friday; a total of 15 stimulation sessions). Immediately after each session of the stimulation, patients will undergo individual SLT. Assessment of language functioning will be carried out three times: before and after the therapy period, and 3 months after its completion. Results of the study will broaden knowledge about hemispherical mechanisms of language and speech recovery after stroke and provide insight into possibilities of their modulation for the purpose of post-stroke rehabilitation.

Promoting Recovery After STroke With Amantadine

The investigators aim to examine whether amantadine can help patients recover from stroke. This will be a blinded randomized clinical trial (RCT). Patients will be randomized post-ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke either to the placebo arm or amantadine arm. Patients will be on study drug or placebo for 1 month but will be enrolled for 3 months total. At various time points patients will be examined and fill out questionnaires to determine level of stroke recovery.

HIIT vs MCIT for Stroke-Related Sarcopenia in Ischemic Stroke

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of post-stroke sarcopenia on prognosis and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke and to compare the effects of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MCIT) exercise programs on muscle mass, as well as on functional capacity, quality of life, and clinical outcomes.

NobleStitch EL STITCH Trial is a PFO Comparative Trial

STITCH - Prospective Multi-Center Comparative Parallel Concurrent Study of the NobleStitch™ EL versus FDA-approved Amplatzer Occluder device for closure of Patent Foramen Ovale to prevent recurrent Ischemic stroke.

Effective Translation of Endovascular Thrombectomy Trials Into Real-world Practice in the Asia-Pacific

As a major breakthrough of acute stroke treatment over the past decade, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) drastically improved neurological recovery and survival in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic strokes in major clinical trials. Nevertheless, much remained uncertain about the implementation of scientific evidence of EVT into real-world benefits. For instance, healthcare policies that influence critical time-matrices, endovascular thrombectomy techniques that may enhance success rate or prevent complications, or advanced imaging techniques that allow precise prognosis or expansion of treatment populations, should be evaluated. On the other hand, capturing LVO patients who were not able to undergo EVT may reveal the gap between clinical trials and real-world practice in the Asia-Pacific. In this multicenter prospective collaboration across the Asian-Pacific, the investigators aim to evaluate the determinants of effective EVT in the real-world setting.

The Fourth Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study

LAAOS-4 aims to determine if catheter-based endovascular left atrial appendage occlusion prevents ischemic stroke or systemic embolism in participants with atrial fibrillation, who remain at high risk of stroke, despite receiving ongoing treatment with oral anticoagulation.

Testing a New Treatment Strategy to Improve Secondary Stroke Prevention for Older Adults: The STROKE75+ Trial

The overall aim of this research is to improve secondary stroke prevention for older patients with stroke. In current practice, patients with stroke are often prescribed antiplatelet therapy with either aspirin or clopidogrel to help prevent recurrent strokes. However, an antiplatelet medication may not be effective enough for some patients. A promising new treatment strategy to enhance stroke prevention involves a very low dose of an anticoagulant (anti-clotting medication) added to the standard antiplatelet therapy. In a previous study, this approach cut stroke risk in half among patients with heart/vascular disease, but it has not yet been formally tested in an older stroke population. The STROKE75+ trial is now being conducted to carefully evaluate the potential benefits and potential risks of this type of treatment strategy for secondary stroke prevention. The medication being tested in the STROKE75+ trial is a commonly used anticoagulant called edoxaban -- at a reduced dose of 15mg once daily (one-quarter of its full dose) to minimize the chance of bleeding. In previous research, edoxaban 15mg daily has been shown to be safe and effective for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation, but it has not been studied in stroke patients without atrial fibrillation. This trial aims to answer the following questions: 1. Does the addition of edoxaban 15mg once a day to standard antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of recurrent strokes more than standard antiplatelet therapy alone? 2. Does the addition of edoxaban 15mg daily reduce the risk of severe (disabling) strokes, dementia, or heart attacks? 3. What is the incidence of bleeding with/without edoxaban 15mg daily? These questions will be addressed using a Randomized Clinical Trial design. Eligible participants are randomly assigned (50/50 chance) to one of two study groups. Participants in Group 1 are treated with edoxaban 15 mg once a day by mouth (tablet) in addition to their usual standard antiplatelet medication. Participants in Group 2 will continue to take their standard antiplatelet medication (aspirin or clopidogrel) without edoxaban. Participants are monitored closely for the duration of the study (approx.. 2-4 years). Every 3 months, participants will receive a phone call to check on their health status and assess if they have experienced any new strokes, bleeding, or other medical problems. Once a year, and at the start and end of the study, participants will also be asked questions about their symptoms, functioning, memory, and quality of life. At the end of the study, patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared and the results will be published. The information gained from this study will increase knowledge and help inform future stroke care for the aging population. The ultimate goal of this research is to prevent more strokes, save lives, and reduce the growing public health burden of stroke.

Urgent Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Versus Delayed CEA in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (SPREAD-STACI II)

In patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis of 50% or greater (measured according to the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)) who have experienced a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ipsilateral stroke, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) offers maximum benefit if performed within 15 days of the initial ischemic symptom. National and international guidelines recommend surgical treatment (CEA) within this timeframe; however, no studies have specifically evaluated the optimal timing for CEA after a TIA or minor stroke. It is well established that the risk of a major stroke is highest in the first few days following a transient ischemic attack or minor stroke and then decreases over the subsequent days and weeks. This raises the hypothesis that performing an urgent carotid endarterectomy (within 3 days) may provide greater benefit compared to a delayed procedure (between 4 and 15 days).

earlY Upper Limb Rehabilitation WIth EEG-Neurofeedback After Stroke

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of early rehabilitation treatment by electroencephalographic neurofeedback on upper limb motor function after stroke. Researchers will compare : Interventional group: electroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme Control group: SHAM electroencephalographic neurofeedback + traditional reference rehabilitation programme

Utility of CC7 Transfer in Stroke Subtypes

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the limb functional improvement after contralateral C7 root transfer in stroke patients.

CUHK Brain Health Longitudinal Study

The goal of this study is to develop a large longitudinal cohort of individuals diagnosed with or at high risk for brain diseases (both neurological and psychiatric in nature), in order to identify risk factors that contribute to neurological and psychiatric diseases over time. The investigators seek to capture relevant information from medical records, electronically administered questionnaires and follow up phone-based interviews. The investigators expect to eventually have sufficient power from our dataset to examine risk factors for a variety of brain disorders, both individually and in aggregate. Our ultimate goal is to offer scientifically validated ways to preserve and promote brain health by working with our patients' needs and tracking their progress over time.

CUHK Stroke Biobank

The purpose of the study are: 1. To make quality, characterized samples and related data available for future studies, including Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), genomics, and biomarker research; 2. To use these samples and related medical information to answer research questions aimed at understanding the genetics and underlying biology of acquired disease and injury to the brain, heart and blood vessels with the express purpose of advancing the search for effective modalities for prevention, treatment, and recovery; 3. To develop additional operational infrastructure to support this project across the Prince of Wales Hospital and divisions, including (1) tracking of patient consent, (2) management of collection and sample processing processes, (3) sample inventory and QC/QA processes, and (4) release of materials to investigators for further research.

Impact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Cerebrovascular Health

Safe and effective severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines may reduce the transmission of and achieve population immunity against the COVID-19 pandemic, which accounted for more than 3.75million deaths worldwide. With World Health Organization's (WHO) effort on ensuring equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, vaccination rate may increase in the near future. On the other hand, vaccination hesitancy has emerged as a major hindrance on the global vaccination campaigns in certain areas due to safety concerns, social factors, and public health policies. For instance, a recent survey conducted in Hong Kong showed a low vaccine acceptance rate of 37%. Long-term safety concerns and post-vaccination events relayed by the social media maybe reasons for vaccination hesitancy. Among which, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) after vaccination were one of the most frequently reported post-vaccination events. These reports ranged from ischemic strokes in elderly patients with multiple cardiovascular co-morbidities, to hemorrhage strokes in otherwise "young-and-fit" adults. While many of these events were investigated by the COVID-19 immunization expert committee, an important premise to address the apprehension of CVA after vaccination is the provision of evidence-based information of the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on brain health. In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study, we aim to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and cerebrovascular health in healthy citizens in a population-based cohort.

Cognitive Strategies for Optimizing Brain Health And Managing Transgenerational Vascular Risk Factors Post-Stroke

People living with the cognitive effects of stroke are at risk for recurrent stroke and further cognitive decline. Also problematic is that stroke risk clusters in families and biological family members of people who have ischemic stroke may also be at increased risk of stroke and/or cognitive decline. The primary goal of this study is to test the feasibility of a virtually delivered cognitive strategy training and health coaching program to reduce vascular risk and promote brain health in persons with stroke and their biological family members.

HR-MRI-Directed Tirofiban Therapy for Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke (TIAN)

This study aims to address the existing clinical challenges by introducing high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-MRI), an advanced imaging technology, to achieve precise etiological classification in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond the time window. HR-MRI allows clear visualization of intracranial arterial wall structures and direct identification of key pathological features of the culprit vessel, including atherosclerotic plaques, vascular wall remodeling, and intracranial hemorrhage, thereby enabling reliable differentiation between intracranial atherosclerotic large artery atherosclerosis (ICAS-LAA) stroke and other etiological subtypes such as cardiogenic embolism. Based on the latest clinical demands and advances in imaging technology, this study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with ICAS-LAA stroke beyond the time window under the precise guidance of HR-MRI. It is expected to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for this specific patient population and further optimize clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Statistical Learning as a Novel Intervention for Cortical Blindness

This project aims to develop a novel visual training paradigm for use in visually-intact participants and those sufferings from stroke-induced visual impairments. Our task design is built upon theories of statistical learning to reduce the overall training burden while still producing profound improvements to visual abilities. Efficacy will be first established in visually-intact controls before testing in stroke survivors to assess the feasibility of this form of learning in the damaged visual system.

Motor Recovery Through Plasticity-Inducing Cortical Stimulation

Using the CorTec Brain Interchange (BIC) System, we will examine the effect of a plasticity-inducing therapy regime on the rehabilitation of upper limb impairment post-stroke. This study's main objective is to implement and evaluate neuroplasticity-inducing stimulation. The stimulation methods for inducing neuroplasticity have been selected based on prior preclinical and intraoperative work that has shown promise in providing rehabilitative benefits for stroke patients. We will be structuring this study as an open prospective feasibility study.

Early Prophylactic Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Following Endovascular Therapy in Large Hemispheric Infarct Trial

Early Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for High-Risk Large Ischemic Core Stroke Post-EVTAcute Ischemic Stroke (AIS), particularly Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO), is a major cause of global disability and death. While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard first-line treatment for LVO, outcomes remain poor in patients with large ischemic cores (ASPECTS ≤5). Despite high recanalization rates (\>90%), only 14-30% achieve functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, with 33-50% dead or severely disabled (mRS 5-6). Outcomes worsen dramatically with larger core volumes (e.g., only 4.4% functional independence with cores ≥150mL in SELECT2).A critical complication is Malignant Cerebral Edema (MCE), affecting \~50% of large-core patients post-EVT. MCE triggers a vicious cycle of rising intracranial pressure, reduced perfusion, and brain herniation. It drastically worsens prognosis: functional independence rates plummet (13.3% vs 51.2% without MCE), mortality significantly increases (OR=7.96, p=0.001), and functional outcomes deteriorate (OR=7.83, p=0.008). Strong predictors include low ASPECTS (\<7) and large infarct volume.Decompressive Hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a life-saving intervention for MCE. Landmark trials (DESTINY, DECIMAL, HAMLET) and their meta-analysis show DHC within 24 hours in patients aged 18-60 significantly increases 12-month survival (78% vs 29%, ARR 50%) and rates of ambulatory independence (mRS ≤3: 43% vs 21%, ARR 23%). DESTINY II confirmed benefit in patients \>60, improving functional outcomes (mRS 0-4: 38% vs 16%). Guidelines endorse DHC for large infarcts with deterioration.However, significant challenges persist: DHC is Underutilized: Despite evidence, clinical adoption remains low.Rescue DHC Fails to Improve Outcomes in Post-EVT MCE: Studies report poor functional outcomes (only 20% mRS 0-2) and high mortality (48.6%) with standard medical therapy (SMT) plus rescue DHC after MCE develops. Retrospective data confirms worse outcomes in these patients (mRS 0-2: 16.4% vs 50%; mortality: 46.5% vs 20%) compared to those without MCE. Crucially, rescue DHC itself fails to improve prognosis once MCE is established (mRS 5-6: 64% vs 57.7%; mortality: 48% vs 46.2%).High-Risk Identification: Patients defined as high-risk for MCE (ASPECTS 3-5 + NIHSS≥30 or ASPECTS≤2) have significantly worse 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2: 23.2% vs 44.6%; mortality: 44% vs 22.7%).Timing is Critical: Rescue DHC is often performed too late, after irreversible neurological damage occurs. Early/Prophylactic DHC, performed before significant edema and herniation develop, offers a potential pathophysiological advantage. It may:Improve cerebral perfusion pressure earlier. Reduce mass effect and edema progression. Mitigate secondary injury (e.g., reduce oxygen-free radicals, excitatory amino acids).Potentially break the ischemic-edema-herniation cycle sooner.Rationale for the Study: While DHC is effective for established MCE in non-EVT contexts and rescue DHC post-EVT is ineffective, high-quality evidence for early prophylactic DHC in high-risk large-core patients after successful EVT is lacking. Current guidelines do not address this specific, high-risk population where MCE incidence is \~50% and outcomes are dismal despite recanalization. Study Aim: This trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy compared to standard medical treatment (which includes rescue DHC if MCE develops) in AIS-LVO patients at high risk of MCE (defined by ASPECTS and NIHSS criteria) following successful EVT. The goal is to determine if proactive intervention can improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality in this critically ill population where current strategies fail.

DELTA (Detecting and Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Post-Stroke Patients)

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal heart rhythm. Because AF is often asymptomatic, it often remains undiagnosed in the early stages. Anticoagulant therapy greatly reduces the risks of stroke in patients diagnosed with AF. However, diagnosis of AF requires long-term ambulatory monitoring procedures that are burdensome and/or expensive. Smart devices (such as Apple or Fitbit) use light sensors (called "photoplethysmography" or PPG) and motion sensors (called "accelerometers") to continuously record biometric data, including heart rhythm. Smart devices are already widely adopted. This study seeks to validate an investigational machine-learning software (also called "algorithms") for the long-term monitoring and detection of abnormal cardiac rhythms using biometric data collected from consumer smart devices. The research team aims to enroll 500 subjects who are being followed after a stroke event of uncertain cause at the Emory Stroke Center. Subjects will undergo standard long-term cardiac monitoring (ECG), using FDA-approved wearable devices fitted with skin electrodes or implantable continuous recorders, and backed by FDA-approved software for abnormal rhythm detection. Patients will wear a study-provided consumer wrist device at home, for the 30 days of ECG monitoring, 23 hours a day. At the end of the 30 days, the device data will be uploaded to a secure cloud server and will be analyzed offline using proprietary software (called "algorithms") and artificial intelligence strategies. Detection of AF events using the investigational algorithms will be compared to the results from the standard monitoring to assess their reliability. Attention will be paid to recorded motion artifacts that can affect the quality and reliability of recorded signals. The ultimate aim is to establish that smart devices can potentially be used for monitoring purposes when used with specialized algorithms. Smart devices could offer an affordable alternative to standard-of-care cardiac monitoring.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery-2

Atrial fibrillation is a heart rhythm disorder that often occurs after heart surgery. During atrial fibrillation blood cloths may form, predominantly in the left atrial appendage, a small sac in the wall of the left side of the heart. Some heart surgeons close this appendage to protect against stroke, particularly in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, yet there is little evidence to support the efficacy and safety of this practice. We therefore conducted the Left Atrial Appendage Closure by Surgery (LAACS) study (2010-2016) were patients in whom the appendage was closed (by chance) suffered fewer brain damages that patients where it remained open. Although encouraging, these results were not only based on strokes, but also on scars without symptoms found in brain scans. The following LAACS-2 study will include a sufficient number of patients to determine whether future guidelines should advise to close systematically the left atrium appendage during a heart operation.