Clinical Research Directory

Effectiveness of CRD-4730 in Participants With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)

This is a Phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, sponsor unblinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose clinical study of CRD-4730 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of CRD-4730 when administered as single oral doses to participants with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT). The study will have 2 cohorts in which participants with CPVT will participate in a 3-period, randomized 2-sequence study. Each participant will receive 2 different doses of CRD-4730 and 1 dose of matching placebo, with each study drug administered as a single dose.

Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate that the OPTIMIZER® Integra CCM-D System (the "CCM-D System") can safely and effective convert induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes in subjects with Stage C or D heart failure who remain symptomatic despite being on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), are not indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and have heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%). Eligible subjects will be implanted with the CCM-D System. A subset of subjects will be induced into ventricular fibrillation "on the table" in the implant procedure room. During the follow-up period, inappropriate shock rate and device-related complications will be evaluated. The follow-up period is expected to last at least two years.

Validation of ECG-Based Ventricular Arrhythmia Localization Algorithms in Patients With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Doctors use patterns on heart rhythm tracings (ECGs) to predict where abnormal heart rhythms originate, but these prediction methods were developed in people with normal heart structure. Patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot have hearts that developed differently, and we do not know if these prediction methods work accurately for them. In this study, we will test whether three commonly used prediction methods work in Tetralogy of Fallot patients by pacing the heart from known locations during an already-scheduled heart procedure and comparing the predicted location to the actual location. Participation adds approximately 15 minutes to the procedure and does not require additional visits. The results will help doctors understand whether current methods can be trusted when planning treatments for abnormal heart rhythms in this patient population, or whether new prediction methods need to be developed.

Computed Tomography-Guided Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

This double arm randomized study will compare 2 ventricular tachycardia ablation strategies: the standard strategy based on invasive substrate and VT mapping with 3D electro-anatomical system vs a tailored strategy which identifies targets based on pre-procedural CT-scan imaging. The primary endpoint will be procedure duration and secondary endpoints will include safety and efficacy criteria as well as medico-economic evaluation.

CARA-VT: a Dosimetric in Silico Study

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a potentially deadly condition, common in patients with structural heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. VTpatients are currently treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs, implanted cardioverter defibrillators or invasive catheter ablation (CA) but the overall success rate of this techniqueis still suboptimal. One of the main reasons is an anatomically inaccessible location of VT's origin (within the mid-wall of the myocardium, on the epicardial site or adjacent to critical structures). Moreover, repeated invasive ablation, technical difficulties or patient comorbidities can lead to non-eligibility for CA. Accordingly, a rationale exists to adopt more effective and less invasive therapies. A promising novel non-invasive treatment option for refractory VT is stereotactic arrhythmia radio-ablation (STAR), originally born for cancer treatment, which consists in the application of high-energy photons in a single 25 Gy dose to limited areas of the ventricles, also to those inaccessible for CA, recognized through non-invasive surface ECG-mapping as the origin of VT. Preliminary small case series described good tolerance and improved VT burden during follow-up. Due to the encouraging physical and biological characteristics of protons and carbon ions, the dose to surrounding healthy tissues could potentially be better spared in comparison with photons. Especially, the cardiac healthy sub-structures might benefit from the use of particle beams instead of photons. On the other hand, due to range uncertainties affecting particle beams, delivering an ideal radiation treatment with heavy ions to fast-moving targets such as the heart, is more complex. So far, the feasibility and the safety of cardiac radiotherapy with protons and heavy ions have only been evaluated in animal models and recently in the first in man case managed by the collaboration between CNAO and San Matteo Cardiology Department in a patient treated with compassionate aim. To date, feasibility and safety data showing potential advantages of particles over photon therapy in dose distributions are missing. Therefore, we propose a study aimed to compare different radiation therapy treatment modalities (photons vs. particle therapy: protons and carbon ions) simulating the RT treatment of ventricular arrhythmias on real patients candidates to invasive catheter ablation treatment. STAR with photons was first reported in 2013 and an increasingly number of case reports and case series have been published ever since, showing an acceptable safety profile and promising efficacy. Decreasing the dose to the surrounding healthy heart tissues is expected to be very advantageous for patients. Particle therapy based on its dosimetric physical selectivity compared to SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy) with photons might have the potential to both lower off-target doses and lower risk of possible side effects.

Ventricular Catheter Ablation Study (VCAS)

This is a prospective safety and feasibility study to evaluate the safety of the FieldForce™ Ablation system in patients with ventricular arrhythmia divided into two groups: VT (VCAS-I) and frequent premature ventricular complex (VCAS-II).

Defining the Risk of Ventricular Tachycardia in Genetic Forms of Early-onset Atrial Fibrillation

To use programmed ventricular stimulation at the time of AF ablation to define the prevalence and mechanism of inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT); pace-mapping to define the site of origin of ventricular arrhythmias; and voltage mapping to define low voltage scar substrate in the basal LV in patients with pathogenic TTN variants compared to genotype-negative controls.

Defining the Risk of Ventricular Tachycardia in Genetic Cardiomyopathies

The goal of this observational study is to determine if electrophysiologic mapping and cardiac MRI can help identify patients that have genetic forms of cardiomyopathy that are at high risk for development of dangerous ventricular arrhythmias. The investigators aim to study: 1. the prevalence and mechanism of inducible ventricular tachycardia 2. pace-mapping to define the site of origin of ventricular arrhythmias 3. voltage mapping to define low voltage scar substrate in the basal LV to determine the risk of development of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with genetic forms of cardiomyopathy. Participants will undergo cardiac MRI before their scheduled procedure and voltage mapping during their scheduled procedure as part of data collection.

Mayo AVC Registry and Biobank

Arrhythmogenic ventricular cardiomyopathy (AVC) is a genetic condition which affects the heart and can lead to heart failure and rhythm problems, of which, sudden cardiac arrest or death is the most tragic and dangerous. Diagnosis and screening of blood-relatives is very difficult as the disease process can be subtle, but sufficient enough, so that the first event is sudden death. The Mayo Clinic AVC Registry is a collaboration between Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA and Papworth Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK. The investigators aim to enroll patients with a history of AVC or sudden cardiac death which may be due to AVC, from the US and UK. Family members who are blood-relatives will also be invited, including those who do not have the condition. Data collected include symptoms, ECG, echocardiographic, MRI, Holter, loop recorder, biopsies, exercise stress testing, blood, buccal and saliva samples. Objectives of the study: 1. Discover new genes or altered genes (variants) which cause AVC 2. Identify biomarkers which predict (2a) disease onset, (2b) disease progression, (2c) and the likelihood of arrhythmia (ventricular, supra-ventricular and atrial fibrillation) 3. Correlate genotype with phenotype in confirmed cases of AVC followed longitudinally using clinical, electrocardiographic and imaging data. 4. Characterize desmosomal changes in buccal mucosal cells with genotype and validate with gold-standard endomyocardial biopsies

Randomized Assessment of TcMS for VT Storm

Three-arm randomized clinical trial comparing two strategies of TcMS to sham stimulation in patients with VT storm. The hypothesis of the study is that TcMS will reduce the burden of VT in the 24 hours after randomization compared to sham stimulation and that TcMS with theta burst stimulation (TBS) will be more effective at reducing VT burden than low frequency TcMS.

Cardiac Radioablation for VT

The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) .

Power Versus Temperature Controlled Ablation for Treatment of VT

Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) is a life threatening heart rhythm that comes from the bottom chambers of the heart (the ventricles) and is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death. The majority of patients that are at risk of VT or suffer a cardiac arrest will have an Internal Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) in situ to treat the abnormal heart rhythm. The ICD can deliver a painful shock to restore normal heart rhythm but importantly does not treat the underlying cause. Current treatment for the prevention of recurrent VT include catheter ablation (CA) or medication. Long-term results with global 12 month VT-free survival rates with CA are around 50%. The trial is to compare 2 different types of ablation catheter that are used to cauterise small areas of unhealthy tissue within the heart that are responsible for VT: Diamond Temp (DT) and Tacticath/Tactiflex (TF). Our hypothesis is that the DT ablation catheter will provide comparable efficacy and safety for the treatment of VT as the current industry gold standard (TF).

VT Cryoablation System Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study

The PMCF is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, controlled study of up to 130 patients designed to collect safety and performance data regarding the use of the Adagio VT Cryoablation System in the treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia.

Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

This study is investigating whether using ultrasound directly inside the heart during ablation of heart rhythm disorders in the ventricles can reduce radiation exposure for patients. During an ablation, catheters are guided through the heart to treat the abnormal electrical signals. Usually, X-ray imaging (fluoroscopy) is used to see where the catheters are, which exposes both patients and hospital staff to radiation. The study is randomized and controlled: half of the participants will have the ablation with ultrasound inside the heart, and the other half will have the standard ablation without ultrasound during the procedure. The main goal is to compare the amount of X-ray time used during the procedure. Secondary goals are to look at safety, effectiveness, and the total procedure time. Patients with premature ventricular contractions or ventricular tachycardia can take part. A total of 70 people will be included, 35 in each group. Using ultrasound inside the heart makes it possible to see the catheters and heart structures directly, so many steps can be done without X-rays. This could make ablations safer and reduce radiation exposure. The study is being carried out at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and at University Hospital Basel. All steps are standardized and data are collected carefully. The results will show whether ultrasound during ablations can significantly reduce radiation and make ablations more efficient and safer.

CHU Dual-Energy Ablation in Ventricular Arrhythmia

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the dual-energy ablation catheter manufactured by Shanghai MicroPort EP Medical Technology Co., Ltd. in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.

Venous Ethanol for Ventricular Tachycardia

Comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial, comparing endocardial radiofrequency ablation alone vs radiofrequency ablation combined with venous ethanol in patients with ischemic ventricular tachycardia -Venous Ethanol for Left Ventricular Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia -VELVET clinical trial

Coronary Flow During Rapid Heart Rates

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the factors which determine how well ventricular tachycardia (VT) is tolerated. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What impact does coronary artery disease have on the ability for a patient to tolerate VT? 2. Does treatment of coronary artery disease with stents improve the tolerability of VT? Participants who are undergoing a clinically indicated coronary angiogram or coronary angioplasty procedure will have measurements of blood pressure, coronary pressure and coronary flow made during pacing at a range of heart rates.

DEEP Substrate Mapping Versus Activation Mapping for VT

Substrate-based DEEP mapping and activation mapping are two of the main techniques used for guiding ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. There is no data comparing directly the extent of applicability, procedural results, and the long-term outcomes between the two mapping strategies.This randomized clinical trial aims to test whether activation mapping is superior to DEEP mapping to reduce ventricular tachycardia recurrence. The primary endpoint of the study is to compare recurrence-free survival rate of ventricular tachycardia at 12 months and procedural feasibility of substrate-based DEEP mapping versus activation mapping for VT ablation.

Functional Substrate-Only Guided VT Ablation

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a leading cause of death and suffering in the Veteran population. Currently, ablation procedures are performed to destroy the diseased tissue that causes this problem. This study will test to see if an experimental strategy of only targeting regions of slow conduction without the induction of VT can improve the efficacy and safety of VT ablation. Once this study is completed, the investigators will know whether this ablation strategy could help increase the efficacy, safety and efficiency of ablation therapy of fatal heart rhythms.

Cohort Study - SBRT for VT Radioablation

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) contributes to over 350,000 sudden deaths each year in the US. Malignant VTs involve an electrical "short circuit" in the heart, formed by narrow channels of surviving tissue inside myocardial scar. Current treatment for VT consists of either implantable defibrillators (ICDs), suppressive drug therapy, catheter ablation or a combination of all 3. Implantable Defibrillators (ICDs) reduce sudden death and can terminate some ventricular tachycardia (VT) without shocks, but they don't prevent VT. The occurrence of ≥1 ICD shock is associated with reductions in mental well-being and physical functioning, and increases in anxiety and sometimes depression. Further, ICD shocks have been consistently associated with adverse outcomes, including heart failure and death. Furthermore, the most important predictor of ICD shocks is a history of prior ICD shocks. Therapies to suppress VT include antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation, neither however is universally effective. When VT recurs despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy and catheter ablation, novel yet invasive, approaches may be required. Such invasive procedures carry consequent risks of cardiac and extra-cardiac injury. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive technique that delivers high doses of radiation precisely to specified regions in the body, while minimizing exposure to adjacent tissue. This technique is currently, and commonly used in the treatment of cancer. Conventional application of SBRT has made use of its ability to spare non-target tissue, including for treatment of tumors near the heart. More recently, clinicians have changed the paradigm, by focusing radioablative energy on ventricular scar responsible for ventricular tachycardia. Pre-clinical studies have supported the concept and were followed by first-in-human VT therapeutic experience in 2017. Subsequent studies have had encouraging results for patients who failed or were unable to tolerate conventional treatment.

Peri-Procedural Transmural Electrophysiological (EP) Imaging of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) contributes to over 350,000 sudden deaths each year in the US. Malignant VTs involve an electrical "short circuit" in the heart, formed by narrow channels of surviving tissue inside myocardial scar. An important treatment is to use catheter ablation to "block" the channel that forms the circuit. Effective ablation requires imaging guidance to visualize the VT circuit relative to scar structures in 3D. Unfortunately, with conventional catheter mapping, up to 90% of the VT circuits are too short-lived to be mapped. For the 10% "mappable" VTs, their data are only available during ablation and limited to one ventricular surface. This inadequacy of functional VT data largely limits the knowledge about scar-related VT and ablation strategies, and reduces the ability of clinicians to identify ablation targets and assess ablation outcome. The central hypothesis of this proposal is that functional VT data, integrated with CT or MRI scar data in 3D, can improve VT ablation efficacy with pre-procedural identification of ablation targets and post-procedural mechanistic elucidation of ablation failure. This research builds on the rapidly increasing clinical interest in electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi), an emerging technique that obtains cardiac electrical activity through inverse reconstructions from ECGs. The specific objective is to push the boundary of ECGi to provide - as a conjunction to intra-procedural catheter mapping - pre-ablation and post-ablation imaging of functional VT circuits integrated with 3D scar structure.

Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Ventricular Tachycardia

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important clinical sequela in patients with structural heart disease. VT generally occurs as a result of electrical re-entry in the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate (scar). Scar tissue forms due to an ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) from prior coronary obstructive disease or a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) from an inflammatory or genetic disease. AADs can reduce VT recurrence, but have significant limitations in treatment of VT. For example, amiodarone has high rates of side effects/toxicities and a finite effective usage before recurrence. ICDs prevent cardiac arrest and sudden death from VT, but do not stop VT occurring. Recurrent VT and ICD therapies decrease QOL, increase hospital visits, mortality, morbidity and risk of death. Improvement in techniques for mapping and ablation of VT have made CA an alternative. Currently, there is limited evidence to guide clinicians either toward AAD therapy or CA in patients with NICM. This data shows significant benefit of CA over medical therapy in terms of VT free survival, survival free of VT storm and VT burden. Observational studies suggest that CA is effective in eliminating VT in NICM patients who have failed AADs, resulting in reduction of VT burden and AAD use over long term follow up. Furthermore, there is limited data on the efficacy of CA in early ICM with VT, or advanced ICM with VT. RCT data is almost exclusively on patients with modest ICM with VT, and this is not representative of the real-world scenario of patients with structural heart disease presenting with VT. Therefore the primary objective is to determine in all patients with structural heart disease and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation compared to standard medical therapy with anti-arrhythmic drugs results in a reduction of a composite endpoint of recurrent VT, VT storm and death at a median follow up of 18 months.

Improving Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Catheter Ablation

This study will assess whether more frequent measurement of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) - specifically health related quality of life (HRQL) - can improve the evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD). It is designed to have feasibility outcomes which contribute to answering the above.

Radiotherapy vs Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to test the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the efficacy of SBRT compared to catheter ablation (CA) in achieving a ≥ 75% reduction in VT burden at 6 months * What is the comparable safety profile of SBRT vs CA Researchers will compare SBRT and CA (standard of care).