Clinical Research Directory

Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting as HYBRID Revascularization Versus Conventional Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

The MICRA-HYBRID trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study comparing multivessel hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) as minimally invasive arterial bypass grafting to left-sided coronary targets (LAD and LCx) plus PCI of the RCA versus conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) via median sternotomy in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease. The primary goal is to evaluate whether multivessel-HCR provides superior 30-day "textbook" clinical outcomes (mortality, MI, stroke, re-exploration for bleeding, and other complications) while improving perioperative recovery and long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Coroflex® ISAR NEO PMCF Study

International, Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study to confirm and support the clinical safety and performance of Coroflex® ISAR NEO coronary stent system to meet EU Medical Device regulation (MDR) requirements in all the CONSECUTIVE patients treated with Coroflex® ISAR NEO coronary stent system sirolimus eluting stent.

Ketamine-lidocaine Versus Ketamine-fentanyl for Induction of Anesthesia in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass

This study compares ketamine/fentanyl versus ketamine/lidocaine in term of their impact on cerebral perfusion during CABG. No prior data address these effects, and the goal is to identify the induction regimen that better preserves cerebral oxygenation.

Comparison of Upper and Lower Limb Maximal Exercise Capacities and Arterial Stiffness in Patients With CAD

Coronary artery disease (CAD) significantly increases mortality rates in both developed and developing countries. In this condition, the impairment of arterial blood circulation leads to insufficient blood supply to the myocardium during both rest and exercise, resulting in symptoms such as angina pectoris, dyspnea, and fatigue. Patients, particularly due to their fear of experiencing angina pectoris, tend to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. This situation contributes to exercise intolerance and a reduction in exercise capacity among individuals with CAD. A review of the literature reveals a lack of studies investigating upper and lower extremity exercise capacity and the physiological responses during exercise testing in patients with CAD. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare arterial stiffness, muscle oxygenation, respiratory muscle fatigue, energy expenditure, perceived dyspnea, and fatigue during upper and lower extremity exercise testing in patients with coronary artery disease.

The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Ferroptosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major global health concern and is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive, evidence-based intervention that integrates exercise training with optimal medical management and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with CAD. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of cardiac rehabilitation on ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death, in patients with coronary artery disease. A total of 90 participants will be enrolled in the study after providing written informed consent. The study population will consist of three groups: 30 patients with CAD who participate in a cardiac rehabilitation program, 30 patients with CAD who voluntarily decline participation in cardiac rehabilitation, and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers without any known chronic disease. Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected from patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation both before the initiation of the rehabilitation program and upon its completion. A single blood sample will be obtained from patients who decline participation in cardiac rehabilitation and from healthy control participants. To evaluate ferroptosis-related molecular alterations, the expression levels of the ferroptosis-associated genes GPX4, SLC7A11, ACSL4, FSP1, NRF2, TFRC, and NCOA4 will be analyzed. In addition, serum concentrations of ferroptosis-related biomarkers, including free iron, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), malondialdehyde (MDA), and GPX4 protein, will be measured. The molecular and biochemical parameters will be compared among the three study groups, and changes in ferroptosis-related biomarkers before and after the cardiac rehabilitation program will be evaluated in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.

A Clinical Trial To Investigate The Effect Of EA-230 On Hospital Length Of Stay In Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery.

EA-230 is a new therapy that may help people recover faster and have fewer problems after bypass surgery. In an earlier clinical trial, participants who received EA-230 during Coronary Artery Bypass surgery stayed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the hospital for a shorter time and had fewer serious complications, compared to those who received a placebo (an inactive therapy). The use of EA-230 was safe and well tolerated. This trial will test EA-230 in more participants to see if it really works and is safe to use in the future. This is a Phase III trial. It will take place in multiple locations and will follow a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical design, meaning neither doctors nor participants will know whether they receive EA-230 or placebo during the trial. Assignment to EA-230 or placebo occurs by chance, like throwing dice. The total duration of the trial, including medical check-ups, will be approximately 71 days. There is a total of 10 visits, including a screening-, a pre-operative-, and 2 remote visits. 7 of these visits are during your stay at the hospital.

BASel Kosten-Effektivitäts-Trial: Drug-coated BALLoon (DCB) vs. Drug-eluting Stent (DES) Strategy in High-risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

The main objective of this randomized, multicenter, international, open-label clinical trial is to demonstrate that, in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention for complex coronary artery disease, a SeQuent® SCB interventional strategy is non-inferior to a new-generation DES strategy in terms of a 12- and 36-month composite of Target Vessel Failure (TVF), that includes: * cardiovascular death (CV death), * target vessel related MI (TV-MI), * clinically indicated target vessel revascularization (ci-TVR), * bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Types 3-5. Eligible subjects will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment of all lesions with either the SeQuent® SCB-based strategy or a DES-based strategy. The randomization will be performed prior to the index procedure once signed informed consent has been obtained and all eligibility criteria have been confirmed. All Subjects will be followed for clinical outcomes at 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years. A subset of 138 randomized patients will undergo control angiography after one-year clinical follow-up (+1 month). An independent core laboratory will analyze all baseline angiograms. If, at 36 months, the non-inferiority of the SeQuent® SCB strategy compared to the DES strategy is achieved, superiority in terms of TVF and BARC Type 3-5 bleeding will be tested. An optional extension of follow-up to 6 years may be implemented based on interim results and the joint decision of the Steering Committee and the Sponsor. Details regarding this optional extension are provided in the Clinical Investigation Plan.

"Expert IVUS-Eye" vs. IVUS-guided Left Main Bifurcation PCI

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing two strategies for optimizing stent implantation during bifurcation stenting of the left main coronary artery (LM): an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided approach versus a "IVUS-trained eye" approach based on angiographic assessment and operator experience. All patients receive the same stent brand and procedure steps to minimize variability. The primary objective is to compare the planimetric stent appearance between two strategies.

Crossover vs Accurate Ostial PCI for Medina 0.0.1 and 0.1.0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally. The left coronary artery system is critically important due to its supply of a large area of myocardium. Ostia lesions of left anterior descending artery \[LAD\] and circumflex artery \[CX\]) present technical challenges during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are considered high-risk lesions due to their anatomical location, relationship with the left main coronary artery bifurcation. Two main approaches exist for treating these lesions: accurate ostial stenting and crossover stenting extending from the left main coronary artery to the relevant branch. Accurate ostial stenting aims to avoid unnecessary stenting of the left main coronary artery, while crossover stenting is more advantageous in terms of ensuring complete coverage of the ostial region. However, the crossover approach may have disadvantages such as larger stent implantation and potential side branch involvement. The current literature does not clearly define the clinical superiority of these two strategies. While various studies have shown no significant difference in mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, the results are heterogeneous, and a definitive consensus has not been reached. The majority of current data are based on retrospective or observational studies. Therefore, well-designed prospective studies comparing crossover stenting and accurate ostial stenting strategies in the ostial left-sided coronary artery (LAD and CX) lesions are needed. This planned study aims to contribute to this gap in the literature by comparing the clinical outcomes of the two approaches.

eCardiacRehab - a Hybrid Patient-Centered eHealth Programme

The overall aim of eCardiacRehab trial is to meet rehabilitation needs of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) regardless of their access to traditional place-based rehabilitation by developing and evaluating the efficacy and cost effectiveness of an interdisciplinary and comprehensive home-based hybrid programme. eCardiacRehab address patient- and system level challenges to increase access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We give particular attention to older patients, women, and those with comorbidities or mental health challenges. The vision of the hybrid home-based eCardiacRehab programme is to make CR available to all. eCardiacRehab is a prospective, multicentre randomized open-label blinded end point evaluation (PROBE) trial. The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite endpoint using a win-ratio framework combining cardiovascular (CV) death, unplanned contacts to the Emergency Department (ED) for observation or admission (\>24 hours) for CV disease, and quality of life. Inclusion criteria are adult Scandinavian speaking patients (≥ 18 years) who have a Norwegian national identification number, with CAD treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), are living at home, and have internet available to them and providing signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are patients with severe aortic stenosis, severe arrhythmias, expected lifetime less than one year as determined by study personnel, otherwise clinically unstable, not fully revascularized, awaits PCI or coronary artery bypass graft operation (CABG) or inability to comply with the study protocol due to any physical disability, somatic disease, cognitive impairment or mental health challenges as determined by study personnel.

Mind-Body Interventions in Coronary Artery Disease

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of a combined mind-body intervention consisting of progressive muscle relaxation and guided imagery on psychological outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. A total of 40 participants will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will receive eight individualized sessions over four weeks in addition to standard medical care, while the control group will continue with standard care only. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed using validated self-report instruments, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and COPE Inventory, administered at baseline and after the intervention period. The main objective of the study is to determine whether structured mind-body techniques can reduce perceived stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms and improve coping strategies in patients with coronary artery disease.

Effect of Mobile-Based Home Cardiac Rehabilitation on Coronary Plaque

This single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of a mobile internet-based, home-based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with mild to moderate coronary artery stenosis. A total of 176 eligible participants will be randomized to receive either a personalized lifestyle intervention via a mobile platform or routine clinical care. The primary endpoint is the change in non-calcified coronary plaque volume, as measured by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 12 months. Participants will be followed for a total of 36 months to comprehensively assess the long-term impact of this digital lifestyle intervention on plaque progression and cardiovascular outcomes.

Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function (STICH 3.0-NL)

This randomized multicenter trial compares coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 358 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and multivessel coronary disease. The study evaluates differences in survival, major cardiovascular events, and quality of life over 4 years, and contributes to the international STICH 3.0 collaboration assessing long-term outcomes.

Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions: the OROBICA Registry.

The OROBICA (Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions) Registry is a multicenter, ambispective, real-world observational study designed to evaluate clinical, procedural, imaging, and economic outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified coronary artery disease. Coronary artery calcification represents one of the main determinants of procedural complexity and adverse outcomes in contemporary interventional cardiology. Despite the increasing availability of advanced calcium-modification technologies and intracoronary imaging techniques, evidence regarding the optimal treatment strategy in real-world clinical practice remains limited, particularly among high-risk and complex patients often underrepresented in randomized trials. The OROBICA Registry aims to systematically collect longitudinal data from all-comer patients treated for severely calcified coronary lesions using contemporary PCI strategies, including intracoronary imaging guidance (IVUS/OCT), rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, specialty balloons, and combined calcium-modification approaches. The primary objective is to assess clinical and procedural outcomes, with particular focus on target vessel failure (TVF). Secondary and exploratory objectives include evaluation of procedural success, imaging findings, predictors of adverse outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and economic impact associated with the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. The registry is designed as a flexible research platform intended to support future hypothesis-generating analyses and provide real-world evidence to improve personalized management strategies for calcified coronary artery disease.

Comprehensive Invasive Physiological Evaluation of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether adding coronary function testing and starting targeted medical treatment for identified vasomotor disorders will also improve angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. The main question it aims to answer is: Does performing coronary function testing in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention lead to better relieve of angina symptoms and improvement in quality of life? Researchers will compare this group undergoing coronary function testing with a control group who will solely undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Participants will: * Undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary function testing in the intervention arm * Undergo percutaneous coronary intervention in the control arm

A Study of SRSD107 in Participants With Chronic Coronary and/or Peripheral Arterial Disease

The study is a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential cohort study to evaluate the pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of multiple doses of SRSD107 in participants with coronary arterial disease (CAD) and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with aspirin as background concomitant therapy.

Stenting Versus Drug Eluting Balloons Only in Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesion (ROBUST Study)

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn immediate and follow up results of percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion using drug eluting balloons (DEB) only in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Researchers will compare endovascular treatment using solely DEB to stenting of coronary bifurcation lesion. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is immediate and follow up clinical and angiographic results of endovascular treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion using DEB in patients with CCS? * Is efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion using DEB only in patients with CCS non inferior to compare stenting of aforementioned lesion which is contemporary recommended standard of care? Participants will: * Take prescribed medication before and after initial procedure during whole observation period (12 months) * Visit the clinic at 1, 6 and 12 months after the initial procedure for checkup, noninvasive tests and control angiography at 12 months follow up * Inform researchers about all adverse events that might be occur during follow up observation period

Validation of Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG)-Derived Cardiovascular Parameters Against Standard Clinical Measurements and Risk Scores in a Community

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether a contactless camera-based technology, called remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), can accurately measure cardiovascular parameters and estimate cardiovascular risk in adults aged 30 years and older living in a community setting in Semanan, Jakarta. This study aims to determine if rPPG can be used as a simple and accessible tool for early cardiovascular screening. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Do cardiovascular parameters measured using rPPG (such as blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac workload) agree with standard clinical measurements? 2. Do cardiovascular risk estimates generated by rPPG (such as ASCVD risk and Framingham heart age) correspond to risk calculations obtained using conventional clinical and laboratory methods? Researchers will compare results obtained from rPPG-based facial video scans with results from standard medical assessments, including blood pressure measurements, heart rate evaluation, and laboratory tests for cholesterol levels, to determine the level of agreement and accuracy. Participants will: 1. Undergo a short facial video scan (approximately 30-60 seconds) using an rPPG-based system 2. Receive standard clinical assessments, including blood pressure and heart rate measurements 3. Provide basic health information (such as age, sex, smoking status, and treatment history) Undergo simple laboratory testing for cholesterol levels This study is expected to help determine whether rPPG can be used as a reliable, non-invasive, and scalable screening tool for cardiovascular risk in community and primary healthcare settings.

Examining the Effects of Video-Assisted Discharge Education After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery on Patient Satisfaction and Anxiety

This study was conducted to examine the effects of standard and individualized video-assisted discharge education on patient satisfaction and anxiety levels following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery. Prior to the initiation of the study, ethical approval was obtained from Hasan Kalyoncu University and the relevant healthcare institutions. The study was carried out with a total of 120 patients who had undergone CABG surgery and were hospitalized in the Cardiovascular Surgery departments of Gaziantep Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital and Gaziantep City Hospital. The patients were randomly assigned into three groups: a control group, a standard video-assisted education group, and an individualized video-assisted education group. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, the Patient Education Satisfaction Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The data were analyzed using SPSS version

Multi-Omics-Based Novel Thrombosis and Bleeding Markers and Risk Model for CHD

Patients with coronary heart disease who take dual antiplatelet therapy face two serious risks: thrombosis and major bleeding. This study aims to develop better ways to predict these risks and guide personalized treatment. The investigators will use a large, long-term follow-up study of Chinese patients with coronary heart disease. This research plans to discover new biomarkers related to clot and bleeding risk. The study will combine information from proteins, metabolites, sugars attached to proteins, genes, and medical images. Using machine learning methods, the investigators will identify the most important markers and test them in the patient group of this study. The investigators will then build new risk prediction models that include these new markers together with traditional risk scores (such as GRACE, PARIS, and Precise-DAPT). This study will check whether these new models are better than existing ones at predicting who will develop clots or bleeding and at helping doctors decide on the best treatment for each patient. The new aspects of this research are: (1) using advanced multi-omics technology to find novel markers specifically for Chinese patients; (2) combining clinical, biological, and imaging data to improve prediction accuracy; and (3) using machine learning to create more precise risk models. The goal is to provide doctors with a more accurate tool to assess each patient's risk of clots and bleeding. This will help them choose the safest and most effective antiplatelet treatment, reduce serious complications, and improve patient care.

Fexuprazan for Prevention of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in High Bleeding Risk Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

This study evaluates whether fexuprazan is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and related upper gastrointestinal clinical events in high bleeding risk patients who require dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. A total of 400 participants at a single center will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio within 48 hours after stent implantation to receive either fexuprazan 40 milligrams or lansoprazole 30 milligrams once daily for 6 months. The study will compare upper gastrointestinal clinical events during follow-up

Improved Management of Patients With Recent-Onset Stable Chest Pain

In Germany, coronary CT offers an accurate and less burdensome alternative to cardiac catheterisation for evaluating suspected coronary artery disease, but it is still underused. The IMPRO stepped-wedge trial tests a new, nationwide care model (NVF) in 16 regions to improve guideline-based intersectoral implementation of coronary CT and assess its impact on cardiovascular outcomes and healthcare costs. If effective, the model of care (NVF) could be adopted across Germany to enhance care quality while reducing unnecessary procedures and expenses.

AERO CAD Study Evaluating the Shockwave C2 Aero IVL System in Coronary Artery Disease

The AERO CAD study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, post-market clinical investigation evaluating the procedural performance and clinical outcomes of the Shockwave C2 Aero Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System in patients with calcified coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study will enroll up to 200 subjects across up to 8 U.S. sites. The primary objective is to generate real-world evidence on device performance and clinical outcomes, including target lesion failure at 30 days and procedural success.

Brazilian Prospective Registry of the Inspiron EVO Drug-Eluting Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Inspiron™ EVO drug-eluting stent in complex coronary lesions in a real-world population. Patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease due to lesions in native coronary arteries and restenotic lesions will be treated with the Inspiron™ EVO drug-eluting stent.