Clinical Research Directory

Trehalose vs Glycine Air-Polishing in Peri-Implant Mucositis Treatment

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of trehalose powder compared to glycine powder when used in air-polishing during supportive therapy for peri-implant mucositis, a reversible inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues around dental implants. A total of 40 adult patients with peri-implant mucositis will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with air-polishing using either trehalose powder (test group) or glycine powder (control group). Clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. These include Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), and Bleeding Score (BS), in order to assess plaque accumulation, inflammation, and bleeding. The primary objective is to compare the reduction in plaque levels between the two groups over the study period. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of changes in gingival inflammation and probing depths, as well as assessment of implant surface integrity through in vitro scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after treatment. The aim of the study is to determine whether trehalose powder offers improved clinical outcomes and greater implant surface preservation compared to glycine powder in the non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis.

Impact of Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation on Treatment Outcomes of Peri-implant Mucositis

This study aims to observe the effects of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant tissues by evaluating clinical and biochemical parameters. The main question it aims to answer is: Would increasing the width of the keratinized mucosa with free gingival graft (FGG) in peri-implant mucositis be beneficial in terms of clinical periodontal parameters and peri-implant crevicular fluid levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to non-surgical therapy alone? Our study consists of 4 groups: Peri-implant healthy group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (≥ 2mm) (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with sufficient keratinized mucosa (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa (\< 2mm) receiving only non-surgical treatment (n=16), peri-implant mucositis group with insufficient keratinized mucosa receiving FGG in addition to non-surgical treatment (n=16). Clinical and biochemical measurements will be recorded at the baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month of the study. Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples will be collected at baseline, 1st month, 4th month and 7th month. IL-1β, RANKL, OPG levels, and RANKL/OPG ratio will be analyzed from collected samples. Researchers will evaluate the possible benefits of FGG application in addition to non-surgical therapy by comparing the biochemical and clinical changes in areas with and without FGG application in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

Effectiveness of Interproximal Cleaning Devices for Biofilm Removal Around Posterior Single Implants With Peri-Implant Mucositis

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different interproximal oral hygiene devices for biofilm removal around posterior single dental implants in patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. Peri-implant mucositis is a reversible inflammatory condition of the peri-implant soft tissues caused primarily by bacterial biofilm accumulation. Effective plaque control is essential for the prevention of disease progression to peri-implantitis. However, there is limited clinical evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of different interproximal oral hygiene devices in implant-supported sites. A total of approximately 75 patients with posterior single implants and peri-implant mucositis will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of the study groups, each using a specific interproximal oral hygiene device as part of their daily oral hygiene regimen. All participants will receive standardized oral hygiene instructions at baseline. Clinical parameters related to peri-implant inflammation and plaque accumulation will be assessed at baseline and at follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome is the reduction of peri-implant biofilm accumulation. Secondary outcomes include changes in clinical inflammatory parameters around the implants. The results of this study are expected to provide clinically relevant evidence to support evidence-based recommendations for interproximal oral hygiene in patients with dental implants affected by peri-implant mucositis.

AI-Assisted Colorimetric Diagnosis of Peri-Implant Mucosal Erythema

1. Background and Rationale The visual diagnosis of peri-implant mucosal erythema (redness), a key sign of inflammation, is highly subjective and varies significantly among clinicians, leading to inconsistencies in early detection and monitoring of peri-implant diseases. There is a critical need for an objective, quantitative, and reliable tool to standardize this assessment. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and colorimetric analysis of digital intraoral scans offer a promising solution to this clinical challenge. 2. Primary Objectives This diagnostic study aims to: Develop and validate a core colorimetric index that objectively quantifies mucosal erythema from digital intraoral scan data. Develop and validate an AI model that automatically calculates this index and provides a binary diagnosis (erythema present/absent) at the image level. Develop and validate a second AI model for precise localization (object detection) of erythematous regions on standard clinical software screenshots. Evaluate the clinical utility of the AI system by assessing its impact on the diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and confidence of clinicians with varying experience levels. 3. Study Design This is a multiphase diagnostic accuracy study conducted at a single academic center. It comprises three sequential phases with independent validation: Phase 1 (Development \& Internal Validation): Analysis of intraoral scans to derive the color index and train the AI models using an internal dataset. Phase 2 (External Technical Validation): Prospective validation of the trained AI models on an independent cohort of patients from a separate branch of the hospital. Phase 3 (Clinical Utility Assessment): A prospective, controlled, observer study where clinicians perform diagnoses with and without AI assistance. 4. Participants and Methods Data Source: Adult patients with dental implants who received intraoral scans using a 3Shape TRIOS 3 scanner. Image Data: Two formats are used: 1) Processed 3D surface files (PLY format) for colorimetric analysis, and 2) Standardized 2D screenshots from the 3Shape software for object detection. Reference Standards: Expert consensus on erythema (primary) and Bleeding on Probing (BOP, clinical inflammatory standard). AI Development: Deep learning models (e.g., convolutional neural networks) will be trained for index calculation, image-level diagnosis, and region localization. Observer Study: Participating clinicians (experts, general dentists, and students) will diagnose a set of test images both unaided and with AI assistance (which displays the color index value and/or bounding boxes). 5. Key Outcome Measures Diagnostic Accuracy: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity (with 95% confidence intervals). Technical Performance: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for automated measurement agreement; Mean Average Precision (mAP) and Dice Similarity Coefficient for object detection. Clinical Impact: Change in diagnostic accuracy (AUC), inter-observer agreement (Kappa), and diagnostic confidence scores when using AI assistance. 6. Significance This study seeks to translate a subjective clinical sign into an objective, AI-powered diagnostic biomarker. If successful, the proposed system could become a valuable decision-support tool in daily practice and clinical research, promoting earlier, more consistent, and standardized monitoring of peri-implant tissue health, ultimately improving patient care.

Clinical, Radiographic, and Digital Evaluation of the Effects of Autogenous Grafts on Peri-implant Mucosa

This study aims to evaluate the effects of autogenous grafts harvested from different palatal regions on the peri-implant mucosa when applied during second-stage dental implant surgery. Clinical, radiographic, and digital assessment methods will be used to investigate the early effects of these grafts on peri-implant mucosal width and thickness. In addition, peri-implant tissue health and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated to compare the effectiveness of the grafting techniques in peri-implant soft tissue management.

Effect of Probe Material on Peri-implant Probing

Evaluate whether the type of probe (plastic vs. metallic) modifies the accuracy of peri-implant probing in single-unit implants, by comparing the probing depth recorded with the prosthesis in place versus without the prosthesis (ΔPD, mm). Secondarily, explore the influence of prosthetic design and implant position on probing values and on other clinical and radiographic parameters.

Experimental Peri-implant Mucositis on Implant Sites That Were Previously Treated With or Without Implantoplasty

This controlled clinical trial will assess clinically, immunologically, and microbiologically the healing of experimental peri-implant mucositis (PIM) lesions in implants treated previously with implantoplasty (IP) compared to those treated without IP.

Efficacy of Adjunctive At-Home Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis

The study aims to establish a validated protocol enabling an alternative approach for bacterial biofilm control through the application of a novel at-home photodynamic/antibacterial blue light therapy in addition to non-surgical professional treatment (NST) for peri-implant mucositis. The primary outcomes will include reductions in plaque and bleeding scores, decreases in probing pocket depth, and lower aMMP-8 levels in PISF. Secondary outcomes will include changes in keratinized peri-implant mucosa (KPIM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Efficacy of a Xanthan-based Chlorhexidine Gel in the Treatment of Peri-implant Mucositis

The peri-implant mucositis is an inflammatory and reversible lesion that surrounds the peri-implant mucosa without loss of supporting bone, clinically characterized by bleeding on gentle probing. It has been estimated that it affects approximately 21% to 88% of individuals and 9% to 51% of implant sites, with prevalences of 47% and 29%, respectively. Experimental clinical researches show that peri-implant mucositis can be reversed if proper biofilm management is maintained. Prevention and regression of inflammation around the implant can be achieved through proper oral hygiene and an effective supportive care protocol, which may include regular clinical check-ups, radiographic assessments, oral hygiene instructions and professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR). Therefore, adjunctive measures such as self-administration of oral rinse antiseptics (i.e. chlorhexidine) may be considered. For examples, the use of a chlorhexidine-based gel in combination with xanthan (XanCHX), in addition to PMPR has demonstrated clinical improvements in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential benefits of XanCHX gel in adjunction to PMPR in patients affected by peri-implant mucositis, promoting a complete healing of the affected tissues.

Impact of Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy in the Improvement of Early Endothelial Dysfunction in Subjects With Peri-implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis

A double-blind randomized-controlled clinical trial is conducted in order to evaluate the impact of non-surgical periodontal treatment on endothelial dysfunction parameters in subjects with peri-implantitis/peri-implant mucositis and without any cardiovascular disease.

Immediate Implant Placement With Different Materials of Customized Healing Abutment for Guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth

: Immediate Implant Placement with different materials of customized healing abutment for guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth: A Randomized controlled clinical trial.

Erythritol vs Ultrasonic Scaler Prophylaxis Systems on Dental Implants With Crowns Made by Different Materials

The aim of the study is to assess which prophylaxis methods is the most suitable for peri-implant hygiene between erythritol and ultrasonic scaler with peek inserts. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on the patient. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: * Erythritol group: erythritol with a particle size of \~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS) * Ultrasonic scaler group: a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI EMS) will be used. Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant. The oral hygiene session will be carried out every 6 months (2-years follow-up; 6 sessions), after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index.

Antiseptic Effects on the Dental Implant Internal Surface Microbiome

Soldiers operate in environments that are more likely to lead to oral trauma, risking poor dentition which can directly impact military readiness. Dental restoration can often be accomplished via dental implant insertion. Microbiome-associated complications that result in bone loss, including the micro-leakage of bacterial species proliferating in the dental implant internal cavity, frequently lead to implant failure. Reduction in implant bacterial load may result in a shift of the composition of the microbiome in favor of less pathogenic species, potentially improving dental implant success rates, reducing surgical revisions, and associated cost savings. This study aims to determine how disinfectant gel (hydrogen peroxide or chlorhexidine) insertion into dental implant internal cavities affects implant failure rates, bacterial load and microbiome composition.

Incidence of Peri-implant Mucositis in Patients With Treated Periodontitis

the objective of this study is to determine the incidence of peri-implant mucositis in patients with treated periodontitis and enrolled in periodontal maintenance and to evaluate the associated risk indicators. An analytical prospective observational study will be carried out, with an initial follow-up of 12 months.

Peri-implantitis Implantoplasty Treatment

This double arm, split-mouth, single centre, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of implantoplasty in treatment of peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis will be treated with open flap debridement, with or without implantoplasty.

Soft Tissue Response to Different Restorative Materials Used in Implant Dentistry

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how different materials used in dental implants affect the surrounding gum tissue in adults who need dental implants. The main questions it aims to answer are: How do different materials (titanium, PEEK, zirconia, and lithium disilicate) affect inflammation around dental implants? What changes occur in inflammation markers in the gum tissue after 3 and 6 months? Researchers will compare the different materials to see which one causes the least amount of inflammation. Participants will: Receive dental implants made from different materials. Have samples of fluid from around their implants collected for analysis at 3 and 6 months. Undergo regular dental check-ups to measure gum health, such as bleeding and pocket depth around the implants.

Distance Between Dental Implants as a Risk Indicator for Peri-implant Disease.

The aim of this study is to analyse contiguous dental implants and its peri-implant status depending on different inter-implant distances.

Erythritol Air Polishing in Mucositis Treatment

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of air polishing systems compared to the exclusive use of oral hygiene instruction in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis

Salivary Minerals in Patients With Peri-implantitis

Patients included in the study will be recruited after arriving at the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Zagreb. During the clinical examination, the patient's periodontal status (bleeding during probing, and the depth of the pockets around the implant) and a control x-ray will be taken to check bone loss. Saliva sampling will occur at 3-time points, when establishing the diagnosis of periimplantitis, before the start of therapy, and at the first control after treatment.

Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Single Posterior Zirconia Implants

The main aim of the present study is to investigate implant success rate after 5 years of function of immediate (Test group; within 7 days of implant placement) versus delayed (Control group; 8 weeks after implant placement) loading of two-pieces zirconia implant, placed in pristine bone without bone regeneration. Implant success rate will be defined according to Buser's criteria. Secondary endpoints: Marginal bone level (MBL) evaluation by means of standardized radiographs; Clinical evaluation of biological (e.g. Plaque Index, PI; Probing Pocket Depth, PPD, Bleeding on Probing, BOP; suppuration upon probing/palpation) and prosthetic/technical complications; Clinical evaluation of soft tissue width, keratinized tissue, marginal and interproximal soft tissue recession; Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) by questionnaire administration: