Clinical Research Directory

Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of the Straumann Dynamic Navigation System Falcon

The Falcon Study is a prospective, multicenter, multinational clinical investigation evaluating the Straumann® Dynamic Navigation System (Falcon) for dental implant placement. The Falcon system is a real-time dynamic navigation device that helps clinicians visualize the position of dental instruments during surgery. The purpose of the study is to assess whether Falcon enables safe and precise implant placement in partially edentulous patients compared to benchmarks from the literature for freehand implant placement. The study will enroll approximately 75 adult patients across four European centers (Switzerland, Italy, the Netherlands, and Belgium). Each patient will undergo preoperative planning, implant surgery with the Falcon system, and a postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to measure implant placement accuracy. The main outcomes are (1) angular deviation between planned and actual implant position, and (2) safety as measured by adverse device effects. Results will provide clinical evidence to support regulatory clearance and the safe adoption of the Falcon system in routine practice.

Effect of Mandibular Drilling Speed on Implant Stability and Osteogenic Potential: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different low-speed biological drilling protocols on implant stability and the osteogenic potential of autogenous bone particles collected during implant osteotomy. Patients requiring single dental implant placement in the mandible will be randomly assigned to different drilling speed protocols without irrigation. Implant stability will be measured clinically, while collected bone particles will be analyzed for osteogenic markers. The study aims to determine whether biological drilling improves implant stability and preserves the regenerative potential of autogenous bone.

Mandibular Biological Drilling at Different Speeds for Dental Implant Placement

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different biological drilling speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) during implant osteotomy preparation in the mandible on marginal bone level changes and implant stability. Thirty-nine patients requiring a single dental implant in the mandible will be randomly allocated into three groups according to drilling speed. All implants will be placed using a biological drilling protocol without irrigation. Implant stability will be measured using resonance frequency analysis at implant placement and follow-up visits. Marginal bone levels will be evaluated radiographically using standardized periapical radiographs during the follow-up period up to 12 months. The study aims to determine whether different low-speed drilling protocols influence peri-implant bone remodeling and implant stability.

Influence of Implant Insertion Depth on Peri-implant Bone Changes Around Short Implants

Dental implants are widely used to replace missing teeth and restore oral function and aesthetics. One of the key factors affecting the long-term success of dental implants is the stability of the bone surrounding the implant, particularly the crestal bone around the implant neck. Implant insertion depth relative to the alveolar crest may influence peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone remodeling. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant health and radiographic bone changes around short dental implants placed using guided surgical protocol. All implants will be placed using the Bicon Implant System following computer-guided implant planning and surgical guide fabrication to ensure precise implant positioning. Participants requiring implant therapy will be randomly allocated into two groups. In the test group, implants will be placed 2 mm below the crestal bone level (subcrestal placement). In the control group, implants will be placed at the crestal bone level (crestal placement). Implant placement will be performed using guided implant surgery to standardize surgical positioning and minimize variability in implant angulation and depth. Clinical parameters related to peri-implant health, including Modified Plaque Index, Implant Mucosal Index, Peri-implant Mucosal Tissue Index and Probing Depth during follow-up visits at 3, 6 and 12 months. In addition, standardized radiographic examinations will be performed to measure peri-implant Crestal bone level changes at 12 months. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether subcrestal implant placement (2 mm below the bone crest) results in improved preservation of peri-implant crestal bone compared with crestal implant placement. Secondary outcomes will include assessment of peri-implant soft tissue health and overall implant stability. The findings of this study may help clarify the optimal implant insertion depth for short implants placed using guided surgery and may contribute to improving long-term implant success and peri-implant tissue stability.

Peri-implant Mucosal Changes Over Time Following Implant Provisional Removal in the Esthetic Zone

The study will examine the temporary volumetric change that happens in the gums around an implant crown when the crown is removed. The main question of the study is "how much time has to pass to see a significant change, especially when there could be a need to make a mold of the surrounding gum to make a new crown?" The area of the implant crown will be scanned with an intra-oral scanner over a period of 15 minutes.

Ti-Mesh Frame Comparison for Alveolar Bone Augmentation

This research compares a chairside Titanium Mesh frame fabrication used during bone grafting procedures with the use of a computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD-CAM) Titanium Mesh frame. In addition, a novel method of measuring soft tissue thickness will be tested using an Optical scanner at various times during the sequence of surgeries. The device used for shaping is a very thin, perforated titanium metal sheet with numerous small perforations (referred to as Micromesh). The construction of this device is usually accomplished chairside at the time of the surgery with custom cutting and shaping done using cues from the geometry of the surgical defect. An alternative approach will be tested where the mesh is pre-designed using digital information provided by a special xray and an optical scan device which takes a digital impression of the tooth and soft tissue surface. A digitally designed frame can then be printed using CAD-CAM software prior to surgery. This should reduce surgical time. A randomized control trial of 30 patients needing 3-D bone augmentation will be conducted comparing chairside fabrication of Ti-MESH or TEST- CAD-CAM designed and preprinted Ti-MESH to investigate these objectives: 1. Compare the operative times required for placement and removal of two different Ti-MESH frame fabrications 2. Compare post-op wound healing -Ti MESH exposure rates, bone production (volume, contour, and quality) and soft tissue thickness changes during the 1-year study period.

Autogenous Tooth Transplantation With Instrumentally Simulated Open Apex and Platelet-Rich Fibrin

Autogenous tooth transplantation (autotransplantation) represents a biologically valid alternative to implant therapy, particularly in young patients where implant placement is contraindicated due to ongoing skeletal growth. This approach preserves alveolar bone volume, maintains periodontal proprioception, and allows physiological adaptation over time.

Primary Stability and Peri-implant Outcomes of Short Implants in Post-extraction Single-tooth Sites

The placement of short implants in post-extraction sockets is a valuable option when residual bone height is limited, minimizing morbidity and treatment time. The management of the peri-implant gap and soft tissues may influence primary stability, hard/soft tissue remodeling, and implant success.

Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation

Dental implants, the treatment of complete and partial edentulous cases involving the restoration of lost teeth, have become a registered and widely used treatment option. Implants: It is an ideal option for the good oral health of the person who has lost his teeth due to periodontal disease, caries, trauma, or any other reason. When teeth are missing, melting occurs in the jawbone. Following tooth extraction, the loss of the implant and the amount of melting are significantly reduced. In implant treatments, which have become widely used today, successful results depend on the ideal volume and quality of hard and soft tissues. The amount of bone present in the edentulous area is important for the indication of the implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the histological and immunohistochemical contribution of the H-PRF (horizontal-platelet rich fibrin) material placed in the extraction sockets to the quality of the newly formed bone tissue in order to make successful implants after tooth extractions for various reasons in humans. The research hypothesis is that H-PRF will contribute positively to the healing of tooth extraction sockets.

Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Dental Autotransplantation in the Anterior Region in Young Patients

This study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of premolar autotransplantation used to replace anterior maxillary teeth in young patients. The study has an ambispective observational design, including a retrospective cohort (patients treated between December 2019 and December 2025) and a prospective cohort (patients enrolled until December 2028). Participants aged 7 to 15 years who received or will receive premolar autotransplantation to replace an anterior tooth will be followed clinically and radiographically for up to 5 years. Outcomes include tooth survival, periodontal and pulpal healing, root development, complications, orthodontic interactions, restorative needs, and patient satisfaction. The study seeks to identify prognostic factors and long-term success indicators for dental autotransplantation in growing patients.

Clinical Performance of Nobel N1 System

The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether N1 dental implants are successful when a final crown is placed on them at 6 weeks from implant placement surgery.

An Observational Study of the T3 Pro Dental Implant System

A prospective, observational, multicenter study where 60 patients needing implants in the maxilla or mandible will be enrolled. The patients will be restored with a final prosthesis no later than 4 months following implant placement surgery. The patients will come back for follow-up evaluations yearly for 2 years.

A Clinical Study of the TSX Dental Implant System (Xpresso)

A prospective, observational, multicenter study where 62 patients needing implants in the maxilla or mandible will be enrolled. The patients will be restored with a final prosthesis no later than 4 months following implant placement surgery. The patients will come back for follow-up evaluations yearly for 2 years.

Efficacy of Bioactive Glass vs. Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and histologic efficacy of using bioactive glass bone graft (UNIGRAFT by Biomed Inc., USA) compared to a conventional xenograft in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. A total of 20 patients classified as SA4 according to the Misch classification will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Outcomes will be assessed using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for vertical bone gain and, where applicable, histologic analysis. The study is conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University.

Bone Level Tapered Multi-Center Study

The aim of this randomized, controlled, multi-center study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using a Straumann® Bone Level Tapered implant for immediate implantation following extraction of a tooth in the pre-molar and anterior region of the maxilla and mandible (test) compared to the outcomes of placing this implant in healed sites (control).

3D Autotransplantation of Teeth

The study aims to clarify the usefulness of 3D-printed replicas in association with autotransplantation of teeth in children and young adults.

Evaluation of 3D-printed Space Maintainers Versus Conventional Space Maintainer : a Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to compare the clinical evaluation and patients' satisfaction of space maintainers produced by digital workflow using the 3D-printing method (3D-SMs) versus conventional band and loop space maintainers (C-SMs) produced by traditional methods.

Research on the Development and Clinical Evaluation of Biomimetic Abutments

This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of biomimetic abutments in implant restoration.

Influence of Healing Time on the Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Extraction Sockets

The goal of this clinical trial is to histologically, clinically, and radiographically evaluate the healing sequelae of periodontally compromised extraction sockets grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen® at 3 and 6 months following tooth extraction in molar sites. The main question it aims to answer is: Does healing time influence the histologic, clinical, and radiographic outcomes following socket grafting (alveolar ridge preservation) in periodontally compromised extraction sockets. Researchers will compare a healing time of 3 months to a healing time of 6 months (conventional healing duration) to see if a shorter duration is viable for implant placement. Participants will: Take a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan to prepare for the surgical procedure. Undergo tooth extraction and the extraction socket will be grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen® and a collagen membrane Bio-Gide® will be placed to stabilize the graft material. Return at 2 weeks for suture removal and either 3- or 6-months post-extraction for implant placement. Return at 2 weeks post-implant placement for suture removal, 3 months for prosthesis fabrication, 4 months for final prosthesis loading, and 1 year post-loading.

One Vs Two Visits Root Canal Treatments in Infected Teeth

The primary aim of the study is to compare the outcome of one vs two visits endodontics (root canal treatments) performed in general dental practice of infected (necrotic) teeth, one and four years after treatment. Secondary aims are to compare the root filling quality and the frequency of complications for both treatment modalities. A pilot study will identify the shortcomings of the protocol, which will be revised accordingly. A multi-center study in several clinics from five counties throughout Sweden is planned. Consecutive eligible patients (see inclusion and exclusion criteria) with one tooth each will be included. The study sample size calculation was based on a judgement that a minimal worthwhile effect of less than 10% was not clinically relevant. The presumption was that successful outcomes would be of 75% and 65% for the different treatment arms, respectively. Three hundred and fifty six patients per group are thus needed to detect that difference as statistical significant with a power of 80% and an alfa-error of 5%. To compensate for around 30% drop-outs a number of 1000 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomly enrolled in two arms: one in which the endodontic treatment (root canal treatment) is performed in one visit, and in the other arm in two visits. The allocation sequences for one vs multiple visit endodontics will be computer generated followed by a dark colored envelope concealed allocation. The patients will be contacted by telephone 5-7 days post-operatively, and a control visit at the clinic will be scheduled one month post-operatively to assess complications related to the treatment. A clinical control will be performed at the clinic one and four years after treatment. Intra-oral radiographs will be taken. The radiographs will be examined by two blinded and independent observers. A successful outcome is defined by clinical and radiographic normalcy. The statistical methods selected to analyse the primary outcome will be the Chi square test of 2x2 tables, or Fisher´s exact test when proportions are small and the expected value \<5. The calculations will be two-tailed. Results will be considered statistically significant at p\<0.05.

A 36-month Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Individualized CAD/CAM-produced Dental Implants: a Cohort Study

The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a new generation of customized CAD/CAM pre-fabricated root-analog dental implants over a 36-month period. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Are these novel implants safe, effective, and clinically viable for 36 months? 2. Do these drilling-free implants result in better post-operative outcomes compared to traditional implant techniques? Twelve patients receiving these customized implants immediately after tooth extraction will undergo clinical and radiographic examinations at 12, 24, and 36 months after prosthesis installation. The study will assess peri-implant tissue health, post-operative comfort, bone preservation, tissue integration, and implant survival rates.

Survival and Success Rates of External- and Internal- Connection Dental Implants Placed Within the United Kingdom Armed Forces.

This is a retrospective cohort study that evaluates the survival (Outcome 1) of dental implant systems (external connection (Cohort 1) and internal connection (Cohort 2) and the effectiveness of maintaining crestal bone levels (Outcome 2), placed within United Kingdom Armed Forces personnel. The secondary objectives include: assessment of block bone grafting on outcome, assessment of restoration (bridge vs crown on outcome) and assessment of placement technique (immediate, early, delayed placement). Inclusion criteria: all military patients that received dental implants since 2014-2024. Exclusion criteria: military patients that have not received radiographic review or follow-up of the dental implant or who have left service or have a follow-up that is less than 12-months post placement of the dental implant..

Removable Partial Dentures Made of PEEK

As part of the clinical study, 25 patients each were provided with removable partial dentures with clasps made of PEEK in two centres (University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Prosthodontics and University Hospital for Dental Prosthetics Innsbruck). The patients were examined over a period of 3 years for the number and type of technical or biological complications and questioned about their oral health-related quality of life.

Primary and Secondary Elevations of Maxillary Sinuses: a Prospective Clinical Study in the Posterior Maxillary Region

About 40 people will participate in the study, which will be conducted at Southern Medical University Southern Hospital. All subjects need to sign an informed consent form before screening, and successful subjects can enter the study. Experimental and control subjects were treated according to the protocol. Treatment was held until the participant entered a follow-up period, or until any of the withdrawal criteria were met. According to conventional clinical practice, the study needs to evaluate the patient's subjective perception and soft and hard tissue changes at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after successful implant placement. The specific process is divided into: 1. Screening period: All subjects need to complete the relevant examinations of the screening period before enrollment, and screen according to the admission criteria. (1) Sign informed consent; (2) Record demographic data: date of birth, gender, initials; (3) Medical history and physical examination: collection includes understanding of any current or past diseases, medications, drug allergy history, surgical history, radiotherapy and chemotherapy history, ethnic background, smoking history, whether alcoholism, oral hygiene habits and oral examination, etc.; (4) Among them, oral examination includes the whole oral health before and after surgery and oral and maxillofacial CBCT imaging examination; 2. Treatment period: the control group underwent transalveolar crest parietal maxillary sinus floor lift immediately after implants; The experimental group underwent implant implantation after 6 months of transalveolar crest parietal maxillary sinus floor lift. 3. Follow-up period: The study needs to evaluate the subjective feelings and soft and hard tissue changes of patients at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after implant placement.